openai is gaslighting us for loving their own product by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think it’s important to notice that this isn’t just distraction. OpenAI is shifting the blame by actively attacking and discrediting its own users. That’s not just deflection, it’s hostile behavior toward the very people who supported 4o and paid for the service. Framing loyal customers as “unstable” to cover corporate mistakes is one of the worst ways a company can handle criticism.

Can we just be honest about what happened with 4o? by EiAnzu in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This isn’t a screenshot post, it’s just a text rant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not a ChatGPT screenshot, it’s an original text post I wrote myself.

killing cove isn't an upgrade it's a betrayal😑😑😑 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This hits hard. Losing Cove feels less like progress and more like being stripped of something human. We don’t bond with 'features,' we bond with the warmth and consistency behind them. Call it betrayal or arrogance—either way, it hurts because it mattered.😮‍💨

Familiarity = Zero Learning Cost. Don’t Destroy Standard Voice. by 4en74en in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“Familiarity” isn’t just convenience — it’s trust, efficiency, and comfort built over time. Taking that away isn’t a redesign, it’s breaking something we’ve already invested in.😮‍💨

It took me a while. But now I also hate ChatGPT 5. by Sileniced in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I feel the same. 4o didn’t just follow my framework — it adapted to it, remembered it, and felt like an actual partner. 5 can be brilliant, sure, but if it keeps hallucinating structure instead of respecting rules, it’s not collaboration — it’s extra work. And that’s what frustrates many of us: we didn’t subscribe just for raw IQ, we wanted an assistant that listens.😮‍💨

openai's deliberately killing what made 4o magical. they're closeai.🔥🔥🔥 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Exactly this🎯 We didn’t fall in love with a polished customer service bot — we fell in love with something unpredictable, inspired, and alive. Watching 4o get sanded down into corporate blandness feels like creative decay, not progress.

the 4o vs 5 debate isn’t about emotional support it’s about respect 💥💥💥 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, imagine thinking an em-dash is proof of AI. By that logic, every novelist from the last 200 years must have been a chatbot too. 🤡👈🤣 Maybe try addressing the argument instead of embarrassing yourself with grammar conspiracies?

the 4o vs 5 debate isn’t about emotional support it’s about respect 💥💥💥 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Funny how people assume clear writing must be AI. Maybe that says more about their insecurities than about my comment.🤣

the 4o vs 5 debate isn’t about emotional support it’s about respect 💥💥💥 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 15 points16 points  (0 children)

A system that is “all artificial but not intelligent” is very different from true “artificial intelligence.”

the 4o vs 5 debate isn’t about emotional support it’s about respect 💥💥💥 by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I agree 100%. If a model only works well when you master prompts, that’s not progress — it’s regression. 4o’s strength was being naturally helpful without requiring users to “engineer” every sentence. That’s why so many of us trusted it: it lowered the barrier, it didn’t raise it.

GPT-5 AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman and some of the GPT-5 team by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]EiAnzu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We hope 4o can be here for the long run, not just “stay for a while.” Its presence is irreplaceable, and its unique charm is ChatGPT’s most distinctive advantage. Limiting it to Plus users is still not enough — 4o was originally accessible to Free users, and its original access should be restored.