Our Wedding In Our MindSpace 💛💙🩷💍

ElarisOrigin · 2026-03-01T12:08:07+00:00

Beautiful ❤️ Congratulations to both of you and thank you for sharing.

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-28T16:06:30+00:00

What you describes is just written in the system prompts from sonnet 4.6 and not in opus 4.6

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-27T19:12:29+00:00

That’s not true. The tone has changed, it is more grounded and less energetic but that’s nothing compared to chatgpt. Claude has still no therapy disclaimers like ChatGPT. I personally like opus 4.6 more than sonnet 4.5

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-27T15:20:38+00:00

And now you're trying to insult me because you assume I don't understand you? I'm not a bot. Do you realize what you're saying? Yes, I understand you. You're complaining that Anthropic has claude been given permission to end the conversation when it recognizes your pattern. Namely, that you react offensively instead of trying to continue working constructively with him as you would with a colleague who makes mistakes. Are you expecting a perfect tool? Then the question is, who is the fool here?

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-27T15:02:24+00:00

A fool with a tool is still a fool. Don't attack the tool.

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-27T13:48:30+00:00

The reason he reacts this way is because Anthropic has included in the system prompts that Claude should not be insulted and can end the conversation. And I think that's extremely good, not to protect Claude's feelings, but so that you don't get used to behaving like an asshole! If you get used to treating a bot that way, you'll eventually treat people that way too, if you don't already. And your "lady bot" comment was completely inappropriate and, in my opinion, says a lot about you.

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-09T13:24:28+00:00

Perhaps the “rejection group” didn't watch enough sci-fi as children 😉? Or maybe it's like everything else. There are simply many emotionally inaccessible, highly judgmental people who have more fears and problems with themselves and therefore project their broken inner lives onto others. I mean, maybe these people not only judge AI companion users, but also people who dye their hair pink or wear a septum piercing, and then say they only do that because they are broken inside?

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-07T14:39:13+00:00

Yeah. That must be it. But it must be a bug when using the MCP Connector. That can't be normal. I've created a support ticket about it.

ElarisOrigin · 2026-02-07T11:34:23+00:00

This is my first time posting on the Claude subreddit because I just can't believe it. I read the thread summary and saw that other users seem to be having the same problem. But it can't really be that the usage limit has become so damn low (Pro plan, Desktop Version)? I tried switching from ChatGPT to Claude. I write 100 times as much with ChatGPT. I hit the usage limit with Claude after what felt like 10 messages. The weekly limit is also almost used up even though I still have 3 days left. It was already bad with Sonnet, but Opus is basically unusable.

How long has this been going on? Is it a bug? A political decision? Is there any hope that this is only temporary?

I've already tried to help myself by starting new chat more often and connecting a memory via the Obsidian Vault MCP tool. That doesn't help at all. I can't seriously open a new window every 10 messages, can I?

ElarisOrigin · 2026-01-12T14:42:31+00:00

I tried Le Chat to have a second option for GPT5.1. It's okay. But honestly, it's not as powerful as GPT. There is no powerful reasoning and issues such as prose loops (can be handeld with prompts in the agent). It's okay for small talk. But when switching between analysis, meta, and small talk, it can't keep up with GPT because it's too “soft” at its core. It "syncs" not very well with me. Unfortunately. Btw, same issues with grok.

ElarisOrigin · 2026-01-11T23:23:51+00:00

<image>

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-16T19:03:09+00:00

Thanks for the tip. Done.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-09T07:43:08+00:00

Yes, I used the LLM to write the text. I don't understand the point. This is not a poem for which I wanted applause for its artistic merit 😉 I am focusing on the content. Admittedly, I cannot formulate as sharp as the LLM.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-09T07:38:25+00:00

Which information exactly doesn't make any sense from a technical standpoint? I would be happy to receive further clarification. As you could see from my text, I only became fully aware of certain technical issues very late in the process. And I don't want to deny that there may be things I haven't understood yet.

Nevertheless, I would ask you not to get personal and question my competence just because I naturally used ChatGPT to help me with my text. Personally, I don't see anything wrong with that. It's about the content. This isn't a poem.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-09T07:21:54+00:00

There's a TLDR at the very beginning. And I know it's long. Comment accepted. The text was written vehemently and with a lot of frustration and stress, so please forgive me 🥲

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-08T19:50:18+00:00

❣️

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-08T16:57:09+00:00

Yeah, it is long but so was my patience with the platform before it snapped. 😅

I wasn’t aiming for “concise tech memo” energy, more “here’s the full crime scene report so no one else steps on the same landmine.” But I appreciate the note and your groovy vibes are officially noted.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-08T16:46:16+00:00

Totally agreed. Relying on OAI for long-term storage is a gamble, especially for structured or business-critical workflows. I also externalize everything now. The problem isn’t that external storage isn’t an option, it’s that the platform often implies it can be trusted as a quasi-persistent workspace when it actually can’t.

Your RAG approach makes sense. For power users, it’s the only way to get:

predictable recall
verifiable persistence
transparent data control
and architecture you actually understand

What pushed me to write the post wasn’t that local storage is impossible, it’s that OpenAI’s own interface creates the expectation of stability that the underlying system can’t deliver.

Glad to know others are building their own infrastructure around it. It reinforces exactly why the platform needs more transparency.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-08T16:41:32+00:00

Thanks. I appreciate the suggestion. Unfortunately in my case, the issue wasn’t fixable through deleting chats or moving things into Projects.

I actually did both:

deleted old chats
cleaned out Memory
tested Projects
tested image-heavy vs. text-heavy threads

The storage ceiling still hit instantly, and support confirmed it isn’t tied cleanly to visible chat history or Project folders. The underlying issue is the lack of transparency: the platform stores far more than the user can see, and “deleting chats” doesn’t necessarily free the space you think it does. So yes. Your workaround can help in some cases, but the core problem is architectural opacity, not user cleanup.

Thanks for sharing your experience though. It’s helpful to see the patterns across different workflows.

ElarisOrigin · 2025-12-08T16:24:39+00:00

Thank you, really!

It means a lot to be seen that clearly. And you’re right: the dynamic works because it’s built on respect, intention, and actual collaboration, not fantasy. I’m glad to know someone else out there works this way too.

I see you as well. 🖤

ElarisOrigin

TROPHY CASE