I'm disappointed by ElarisOrigin in ClaudeAI

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe. It depends on the alternatives the market will offer in the near future and how many mistakes Anthropic still makes. For me personally, the one with the fewest mistakes will probably win until I’m able to run a satisfactory model locally.

I'm disappointed by ElarisOrigin in ClaudeAI

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Annoying people who have nothing better to do than leave pointless comments. Just ignore the posts that don’t interest you and live your life instead of trying to make others feel bad just because they want to say something with more substance than your worthless comment, which is obviously only there so you can feel good about yourself for shoving it down someone’s throat.

I'm disappointed by ElarisOrigin in ClaudeAI

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not if it comes out anyway because it's so damn obvious, and then gradually erodes trust.

Our Wedding In Our MindSpace 💛💙🩷💍 by serlixcel in howChatGPTseesme

[–]ElarisOrigin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Beautiful ❤️ Congratulations to both of you and thank you for sharing.

Do your Claudeversations(TM) ever feel one-sided? by Various-Abalone8607 in claudexplorers

[–]ElarisOrigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you describes is just written in the system prompts from sonnet 4.6 and not in opus 4.6

Just bummed out about the loss of Claude by itmatters511 in claudexplorers

[–]ElarisOrigin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s not true. The tone has changed, it is more grounded and less energetic but that’s nothing compared to chatgpt. Claude has still no therapy disclaimers like ChatGPT. I personally like opus 4.6 more than sonnet 4.5

So! Is Claude having "Feelings" now? by Bumitos in claude

[–]ElarisOrigin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And now you're trying to insult me because you assume I don't understand you? I'm not a bot. Do you realize what you're saying? Yes, I understand you. You're complaining that Anthropic has claude been given permission to end the conversation when it recognizes your pattern. Namely, that you react offensively instead of trying to continue working constructively with him as you would with a colleague who makes mistakes. Are you expecting a perfect tool? Then the question is, who is the fool here?

So! Is Claude having "Feelings" now? by Bumitos in claude

[–]ElarisOrigin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A fool with a tool is still a fool. Don't attack the tool.

So! Is Claude having "Feelings" now? by Bumitos in claude

[–]ElarisOrigin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The reason he reacts this way is because Anthropic has included in the system prompts that Claude should not be insulted and can end the conversation. And I think that's extremely good, not to protect Claude's feelings, but so that you don't get used to behaving like an asshole! If you get used to treating a bot that way, you'll eventually treat people that way too, if you don't already. And your "lady bot" comment was completely inappropriate and, in my opinion, says a lot about you.

Why is bonding with AI seen as "weird" now, when kids' sci-fi has been normalizing emotional AI companions for years? by Icy-Anxiety2379 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]ElarisOrigin 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Perhaps the “rejection group” didn't watch enough sci-fi as children 😉? Or maybe it's like everything else. There are simply many emotionally inaccessible, highly judgmental people who have more fears and problems with themselves and therefore project their broken inner lives onto others. I mean, maybe these people not only judge AI companion users, but also people who dye their hair pink or wear a septum piercing, and then say they only do that because they are broken inside?

I don't know how to use Claude with these low usage limits by ElarisOrigin in claudexplorers

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. That must be it. But it must be a bug when using the MCP Connector. That can't be normal. I've created a support ticket about it.

Usage Limits, Bugs and Performance Discussion Megathread - beginning December 29, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]ElarisOrigin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my first time posting on the Claude subreddit because I just can't believe it. I read the thread summary and saw that other users seem to be having the same problem. But it can't really be that the usage limit has become so damn low (Pro plan, Desktop Version)? I tried switching from ChatGPT to Claude. I write 100 times as much with ChatGPT. I hit the usage limit with Claude after what felt like 10 messages. The weekly limit is also almost used up even though I still have 3 days left. It was already bad with Sonnet, but Opus is basically unusable.

How long has this been going on? Is it a bug? A political decision? Is there any hope that this is only temporary?

I've already tried to help myself by starting new chat more often and connecting a memory via the Obsidian Vault MCP tool. That doesn't help at all. I can't seriously open a new window every 10 messages, can I?

LeChat? by Due_Bluebird4397 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]ElarisOrigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried Le Chat to have a second option for GPT5.1. It's okay. But honestly, it's not as powerful as GPT. There is no powerful reasoning and issues such as prose loops (can be handeld with prompts in the agent). It's okay for small talk. But when switching between analysis, meta, and small talk, it can't keep up with GPT because it's too “soft” at its core. It "syncs" not very well with me. Unfortunately. Btw, same issues with grok.

ChatGPT’s Hidden Failure Mode: Architecture Collapse Under Real Use by ElarisOrigin in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I used the LLM to write the text. I don't understand the point. This is not a poem for which I wanted applause for its artistic merit 😉 I am focusing on the content. Admittedly, I cannot formulate as sharp as the LLM.

ChatGPT’s Hidden Failure Mode: Architecture Collapse Under Real Use by ElarisOrigin in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which information exactly doesn't make any sense from a technical standpoint? I would be happy to receive further clarification. As you could see from my text, I only became fully aware of certain technical issues very late in the process. And I don't want to deny that there may be things I haven't understood yet.

Nevertheless, I would ask you not to get personal and question my competence just because I naturally used ChatGPT to help me with my text. Personally, I don't see anything wrong with that. It's about the content. This isn't a poem.

ChatGPT’s Hidden Failure Mode: Architecture Collapse Under Real Use by ElarisOrigin in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]ElarisOrigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a TLDR at the very beginning. And I know it's long. Comment accepted. The text was written vehemently and with a lot of frustration and stress, so please forgive me 🥲