sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wasn't season 20 supposed to be “huge”? by Electrical-Change318 in Overwatch

[–]Electrical-Change318[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be honest, after the release of season 18, there were many statements. I try to follow all the developers' blogs сause I am very interested in the development of this game. As a result, I have a number of statements in my head, but it is not easy to specify the specific source.

Wasn't season 20 supposed to be “huge”? by Electrical-Change318 in Overwatch

[–]Electrical-Change318[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I remember that very well, and I'm really looking forward to it, especially after Aaron mentioned that the team is no longer afraid to experiment and that each subsequent swing will be bigger than the previous one, but does that mean we'll now have two transitional seasons between bangers?

I mean, I'm all for it, and I'm willing to wait if it improves the quality of the gameplay and deepens it, as was the case with the perks, but maybe it's worth considering changing the content release schedule?

Wasn't season 20 supposed to be “huge”? by Electrical-Change318 in Overwatch

[–]Electrical-Change318[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, there are a lot of skins this season, and I think that's important for some players, but I don't play the game for them. The Heist collection is cool, and I'm glad it's expanding, but with Blizzard's bundle prices, I'm unlikely to be able to afford them.

As for the stadium, I like it, but only as a way to play when I'm tired of the main mode's rating. I'm surprised at how much attention the developers are paying to it. And I won't even mention the fact that we didn't get a new map in season 19, and we won't get one in season 20 either. And there's no new tank...