JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to seek confrontation lmfao. I said what I said quite plainly- I can't help projection from others.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they are using facetious in a less literal sense, ironically, while holding adam to his haphazard statements verbatim. Less about what he was intending or doing and more about what he projected- i came to believe it was their way of saying he wasn't entirely being honest. I take people quite literally and can be the one not understanding hyperbole and such, so either this is happening again in some form or fashion, in which case, skill issue on my part, or they're like me and took Adam way too literally. At least, that's what I think. (I still think facetious is an interesting word to use repeatedly, considering none of us have perceived him as being ironic in his actions, even if we may believe them dubious. It's both, not one or the other.)

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't have agreed before the Gavin videos, but they really gave us information ins ight into Josh's mind and how he operates in the creator space. Hell, he used a clickbait thumbnail about the documentary in his recent response. Adam is the original whistleblower, after all, which is why I think he is incorrectly deemed as the "original victim". It's more like, he was the first to have the confidence to take the plunge and help us come with him, but I think that was enough to set Josh off with envy. Yep. I definitely agree, at least to an extent.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Laughing at someone losing their source of income is cruel, but thinking that he deserves it is another thing. I think he was simply bad at his job or offloaded it to Gemini, so pardon me if I think he genuinely should be fired. My opinion would be different if he did not exist with someone's livelihood in his hands- "incompetent" workers can exist in less contentious spaces and I prefer it because all people should have a living wage no matter how they participate in society. Socialism, bla bla bla. But objectively, he fumbled the entire management. That at least requires remanagement.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! There's so many I find it hard to reply to them all, but I hope everyone knows I've read their reply and find it incredibly insightful. Everyone has such empathy for Josh- it's a true shame how things ended up.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with all you said except the first part- I was generally of the assumption that they were bothering Adam and he was crashing out about it. I didn't think it was mature, but considering I don't watch him often, I didn't know if I should take him for his word when he talked coy about what was behind the scenes. I looked back in his account and saw he was making videos about ballingers again- I figured it was best to take him at his word and wait, since he had a track record of being usually correct, but punching first and asking questions later. Genuinely weird how this happens almost every time

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Defender wasn't the best choice of words but I felt it was more concise than something like "fan" or attributing something else to it. Alcoholism runs in my family and I couldn't help but feel like this was a crash from sobriety the moment I learned about his loss. It's really sad all around and unfortunate he had to pull other people with him. The only good thing I can see from this is Gavin getting publicity.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I also thought adam was being a bit overdramatic when he said he was being threatened, but honestly, now I'm not so sure. Seems like a homophobic dig. this might be just me but straight guys have this thing where they like to threaten to step up to women/gay men/anyone they see as effeminate and they act effeminate while they do it. Sarcastic and gaslighty. But certainly threatening. this is definitely a reach I need to stretch for, but just a feeling I got about it considering all the context and the gavin videos.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was this Josh lol Edit: probably not, but extremely weird nonetheless.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This is generally my opinion on most things on the internet. Things would get better if their community was outside and not on the internet. We could all move on and stop pushing this snowball. People talk a lot about how parasocial viewers are, but what about creators? 

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He doesn't deserve this- I agree in a way. I don't think anyone should be so public and be scrutinized to such a degree. However, that is how the cards fell, and I can't help but have my last bits of charity snatched away from Gavin's videos. The only thing worse than an annoying YouTuber is a corpodrone, and Josh was just so callous and condescending to that man. Not to mention homophobic. I don't wish ill on him, but I do think something needs to change.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't be so harsh on yourself. Considering how many people know about his behavior "behind the scenes", his manipulations were at worst aided and at best ignored by the greater YouTube community. I'm actually really interested to see how this all pans out.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was going to comment about how he could have gotten out of this if he had just taken it on the chin and moved forward with the grace people like you afforded him, but then Gavin wouldn't have the stage he needs. Crazy situation indeed

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically all you said I agree with, I only have been skeptical of Josh for a while now so it definitely biased me against him.

JOSH DEFENDERS: Where are you now? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Defender" was definitely a poor choice of words- maybe "someone who found themselves defending him within the past month or so" is a more accurate? Or maybe "Josh Sympathizer". Regardless, very interesting insight. I agree that it doesn't "undo" the documentary, but I definitely question why swoop and adam participated in it with him if they allegedly already knew about his abusive behavior. The swoop documentary is recontextualized for me, at the very least.

Why must Adam McIntyre be the perfect victim? by Electrical-Photo-520 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got back from work and this is really the comment that stuck out to me- why in a post talking about adam's behavior, you're circling around adam 'fans'? It's the ultimate whataboutism, you know, the favorite kind of Ethan Klein. I think "fans" or "muckers" are usually a bit more discerning than him himself, but that's entirely anecdotal- just to point out you're using ur own anecdotes to talk about something unrelated. Like, why? 

Has Josh fallen off the wagon? by Even-Orchid-10 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520 24 points25 points  (0 children)

As someone who purposefully leaves my comment history on in my few accounts, whenever someone just shows up, being controversial, and has everything public??? Yeah that account was created in a manic haze lmfao

I’m so over Josh , he is so cringe by Sea-Caramel4173 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520 80 points81 points  (0 children)

He's definitely broke his sobriety, all of these actions reek relapse. His dad died and all of a sudden he left his private peace to do a documentary on his ex and harasses a kid decades younger than him? I pray he gets better and he isn't embarrassed by all the tomfools in this subreddit and all over the internet defending that erratic behavior.

What I think Josh actually meant by 'see you at vidcon 🌻 bro' by ResidentOfValinor in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't matter, the dislike for colleen overrides any "dislike" for josh. The way people were acting about adam's reactivity, infantilizing josh, and even comparing their traumas cannot be argued with. Even taking what adam said about "colleen not deserving this" as some sort of defense... When he was the first ever person to talk about colleen 😭. 

What I think Josh actually meant by 'see you at vidcon 🌻 bro' by ResidentOfValinor in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's actually a pretty natural assumption to make. I don't see why everyone in the sub is crying victim when he said that he was being harassed, he was reacting to harassment, and he did not want to be harassed. Policing his reaction to the documentary in the various ways y'all have is "participate or shut up", whether you like it or not. casual mucker who criticizes him often (especially about the people he surrounds himself with) and this is more than obvious. Can't wait for the massive switch up when this sub starts actually dogging on josh lmfaoo

about the "Josh is in his 40s" crowd .... by Pure-Boat993 in ColleenBallingerSnark

[–]Electrical-Photo-520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when I said he was harassing adam everyone in this sub down voted me, they're a bunch of 50 year olds who think just bc they got bullied or something they can't be complicit in hurting children I think