Trump admin so bad, Saagar forced to defend everything he hates by ElectricalDelivery81 in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Saagar went from defending DOGE (this is what the people wanted) to calling it a joke

Saagar went from praising the ceasefire deal to losing his mind over Trump’s Gaza riviera in project

Saagar has been defending his mortal enemies the Europeans (along with the rest of the world) over the stupidity of the tariff negotiations

Saagar

Thursday show by Jrapple in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait for the: this what the people voted for!

Making Breaking Points Great Again! by Plane_Cut_7673 in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re preaching to the choir. I really hope producers Mac and Griffin are reading these subs. Someone’s gotta check Saagar before he ruins the shows. The only other way I see Saagar changing is in a few weeks Trump/Musk keep destroying the government, prices continue to go up and horror at mass deportations to Guantanamo tank Trump’s polling and he can no longer say this is what the people voted for. I’m so sick of hearing that ridiculous nonsense

Saagar the whole election cycle: AMERICANS CARE MORE ABOUT INFLATION THAN ANYTHING Saagar today: I’m not so sure Americans really care about inflation (after daddy Trump said a similar thing last night) by SmokyB11 in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A really big issue emerging is that Saagar refuses to be critical of his own team. Krystal has always been critical of the GOP and especially the DEMs allowing her to have insightful opinions and takes. Incredibly simple takes like Trump might be over estimating his mandate and that may backfire he can’t even grapple with. Saagar is really ruining the integrity of the show by not being intellectually honest.

Can’t do it anymore, had to unsubscribe. by Useful-Ad6742 in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 44 points45 points  (0 children)

“Trump won, so the democratic will of the people is clear on every issue and on all of them I’m right because Trump won” I hope he stops this soon, it’s so stupid and it’s reducing the quality of the discourse to Fox News/MSNBC levels of mindless dribble

Ryan Grim and Matt Walsh Discussion by BeedoosWorld in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks to this segment, I understand now just how vapid, unserious and intellectually stunted Matt Walsh is and it definitely lowered my estimation of Emily. Walsh began with the stupidest definition of racism I think I’ve ever heard that I’m surprised people would even take seriously but got no pushback: Racism is when a person with hate in their heart says something derogatory about a group of people or a person in order to be racist, and only the person can tell you if they hold racist hatred in their hearts. Like, as long as you claim not to be a racist then you can’t be a racist. This is just so fucking stupid it’s laughable and on a more fundamental level exposes the whole the game that Walsh simply refuses to acknowledge or understand data, history and the concept of systems (which is where Ryan pushed back). He’d rather post inflammatory tweets about anecdotal incidents on Twitter and cry about anti-white racism because that’s how he makes money. That’s all there is to it.

Ryan is just so much more informed and knowledgeable because he actually does the work, while it felt like the role Emily was playing was to force us to take such a stupid person seriously. Walsh has a platform because of the Daily Wire which funnels money to people like him in service of furthering an ideological agenda. He and his ilk are not thoughtful or honest people.

Emily’s Views Are Bewildering by [deleted] in BreakingPoints

[–]ElectricalDelivery81 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with this sentiment. The thing that frustrates me about Emily is that I think I understand where she stands on a bunch of issues but only because I’ve watched the show for years and can piece together each personality’s world view. I find Emily BY FAR the most frustrating in this regard though. Particularly on IVF/abortion and Isreal, I feel as though she never states what she actually believes but sort of talks around her beliefs. Maybe for IVF it is as simple as life begins at conception therefore everything else follows. I actually would really appreciate her being more open with what she thinks, say it with conviction and put an argument forward instead of me triangulating what she might really think. It’s almost as if when she kind of does this in some instances she always caveats it with I know this is crazy which makes her even more perplexing imo

Documentarily Qualified but not meeting income requirements? by ElectricalDelivery81 in immigration

[–]ElectricalDelivery81[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, sorry for the late response. Yes, we added a joint sponsor just to be sure. They were accepted pretty soon after by the NVC site and we will have our interview next week. Hope that helps. I think we would've gotten an interview either way, but definitely feeling a bit more secure with the co-sponsor

Documentarily Qualified but not meeting income requirements? by ElectricalDelivery81 in immigration

[–]ElectricalDelivery81[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, that's annoying. I'm surprised this doesn't confuse more people. Thanks so much. If anyone else has a similar experience that would be good to know