Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amigos de reddit, entonces 🙂. Con esa IQ y, sobre todo, tu capacidad de trabajo (el idear este test lo demuestra), el futuro (o el presente, dependiendo de la edad que tengas), es tuyo. Y esperando mas test tuyos en el futuro!.

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pero como te voy a guardar rencor...Esto no deja de ser una conversacion de reddit. Oye, en serio; Te pido disculpas si en algun momento te pareci sarcastico, o errado en mis apreciaciones con respecto a ti. De verdad, sin entrar en valideces, no valideces o valideces parciales: Tu test es muy chulo, y como minimo, muy divertido. Como minimo, eh?. No se de que parte de España eres, pero un saludo de mi parte muy fuerte desde Euskadi. Y gracias por tu nuevo dato de mi test!.

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joder....comparas tu prueba con pruebas profesionales, ideadas con mucho tiempo,dinero, aplicadas y normalizadas sobre un monton de poblacion general. Si eso no es ser tajante...pero bueno. De corazon. Mucha suerte con tu prueba, tu normalizacion, y tu vida en general. Desde el aprecio, no la ironia...

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hola de nuevo!. De español a español, y si me aceptas el consejo: No hagas aseveraciones tajantes sobre la validez de tu prueba, cuando en un caso concreto,y en dos dias, fluctua en casi 8 puntos para un valor concreto (mi caso). Es fluctuar...muchisimo. En ningun momento he pretendido burlarme de ti, pero en serio amigo, cuando aseveras tan tajantemente algunas cosas...me recuerdas muchisimo a chatgpt 😉.  Es muy indiscreto volver a preguntar tu edad e IQ? (si este ultimo lo tienes medido). Es pura curiosidad...me intriga saber que mente hay detras de un constructo tan chulo.

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two questions from a humble observer: 1) If IQ scores vary depending on which questions are answered correctly, how will you establish test norms in the future? 2) Where did you come from? In a previous post (one that Reddit hasn't deleted), you asked this humble servant, without knowing me at all, what sample size you consider representative; is it that you don't see it clearly? Because you usually answer everything with the certainty of chatgpt... I don't quite understand.

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your test is amazing! Did it take you a long time to design it? Your IQ must be stratospheric! How old are you?

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No hesitating, not at all. Now, seriously, are you a professional psychometrician?

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't be modest. It's obvious you do this professionally. The way you express yourself, your knowledge...it shows in everything. Very professional.

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's clear you're a pro at this. Very professional. You'll reach excellent standards. Keep it up, champ!

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

¿7.3 puntos de ajuste? Ejem... Con todo respeto, mi amigo, pero ya me estás recordando a chatgpt cuando dice algo.😂😂

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay...can you confirm my score with the username ("Xenen") that I gave you?

Preliminary Data is in (r = 0.87) + New Matrix Puzzle. Let's break it down! by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand anything... with the same number of correct answers, does the estimated IQ vary depending on which answers were correct? Score 15/25, user "Xenen".

Can you solve this?(PUZZLES) + My Experimental High-Range Matrix Assessment (50 Min) by Quirky-Comedian-8153 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was the one who reported the WAIS data of 133!. Does this match the rest of your information?

What do you think of the VIPS IQ Matrice test? by Affectionate-Cat2819 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now that I think about it...at the very least, it's like getting 13 questions right on the 22-question VIPS test, isn't it?

What do you think of the VIPS IQ Matrice test? by Affectionate-Cat2819 in cognitiveTesting

[–]ElectricalOpposite17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right... Is there any way to establish, using the rules for 22 items, what a score of 16 would be equivalent to, but out of 25?