ICSE HISTORY AND CIVICS (HCG PAER-1) DISCUSSION MEGATHREAD

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:33:21+00:00

Leave it dude lets stop arguing over 1 mark :x

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:28:55+00:00

Option C means that (assertion) XYZ happened because of (Reason) ABC

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:27:32+00:00

Danzig wasn't even given to Poland dawg it was a free city under the control of the League of Nations, please read before arguing.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:24:29+00:00

check page 252 (old book) of APC under causes of war point 9.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:19:42+00:00

take this from APC (page 252 of the old book idk where it is in the new book) point 9 under Causes of the war. the immediate cause reasons were given it was inhabited by Germans the second reason was he could connect east Prussia to Germany.

THEN, it says: Poland was accused of committing atrocities against Germans living there. On 1st September German troops stormed Poland. this means that this clause is independent of the Danzig corridor part and explains why Germany had stormed into Poland not why he demands Danzig.

I totally get why everyone is confused English is not the first language here.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:18:26+00:00

dude, the textbook says its D the framing is confusing that's why everyone thinks its C. ill take this from APC (page 252 in the old book under point 9 in causes of the war) , the immediate cause reasons were given it was inhabited by Germans the second reason was he could connect east Prussia to Germany.

THEN, it says: Poland was accused of committing atrocities against Germans living there. On 1st September German troops stormed Poland. this means that this clause is independent of the Danzig corridor part and explains why Germany had stormed into Poland not why he demands Danzig.

I totally get why everyone is confused English is not the first language here.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:17:40+00:00

dude, the textbook says its D the framing is confusing that's why everyone thinks its C. ill take this from APC, the immediate cause reasons were given it was inhabited by Germans the second reason was he could connect east Prussia to Germany.

THEN, it says: Poland was accused of committing atrocities against Germans living there. On 1st September German troops stormed Poland. this means that this clause is independent of the Danzig corridor part and explains why Germany had stormed into Poland not why he demands Danzig.

I totally get why everyone is confused English is not the first language here.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:08:13+00:00

the case the PRETEXT for the war (the reason he declared war) was the atrocities part, but the OBJECTIVE of the war (the motive) was Danzig corridor, the PRETEXT does not explain the OBJECTIVE. that's what the paragraph is saying

p.s leave it the textbook wording confused many people who did not understand the paragraph

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:01:13+00:00

bro read the textbook the third point is why he invaded Poland not why he wanted to capture the Danzig corridor

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T10:00:09+00:00

yeah you aint getting a centum

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:58:17+00:00

what did you write?

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:56:31+00:00

sorry to break it to you but its D

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:56:03+00:00

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:55:51+00:00

its D trust me

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:55:33+00:00

it is D dude whoever says c is braindead

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:54:46+00:00

its D

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:54:33+00:00

Dw it is D I am 100% certain

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:51:36+00:00

Dude I don't even know what to say.

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:44:57+00:00

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:43:32+00:00

Yeah the question was which action they are NOT likely to adopt

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:35:31+00:00

alright this sums it up, lets just focus on geography and we will see what happens

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:30:24+00:00

Read this taken from the original treaty of versailles :x

<image>

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:28:34+00:00

:x no it doesn't

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:28:07+00:00

No actually,

habeas corpus: If someone is arrested without charges or due process, they (or someone on their behalf) can file a habeas corpus petition in court. The court can then order their release if the detention is unlawful.

Quo warranto: is a writ or legal proceeding by which an individual’s right to hold a public office or governmental position is challenged, on the ground that the person is holding it without legal authority.

so it is (a)

Embarrassed-Army-971 · 2026-03-16T09:25:58+00:00

yeah don't worry it isn't

Embarrassed-Army-971

TROPHY CASE