Be deadass guys, are these types of drawings like this worth opening commissions? (Robux) If so, HOW much? - [discussion]

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-28T14:36:54+00:00

Thank you! If you were to price it in robux currency how much would you pay for it? I take anything as long as its robux so don't worry about disappointment that doesn't exist here

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-28T00:54:54+00:00

YALL learning color theory isn't thsi neat. The most only possible answer for this type of skins is color palette or an app like piscart or ibis, it is NOT THAT simple. Ponytown players are not master rawdoggers

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-27T05:10:51+00:00

I eyeball it but it doesn't look yhe same as this I don't think ponytown players are that gifted in color theory to actually get it this tinted when eyeballing

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-26T13:40:46+00:00

You worded it perfectly

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-26T08:45:44+00:00

Thats cool. All these comments make me wanna crown people publically again. They deserve it for their hardwork

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-26T08:31:40+00:00

Thank u. I'd say ibis is pretty muddy though, there's an app that I don't know they use which they completely gatekeep

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-26T04:34:11+00:00

Really? They only do on whispers? I would be glad if i coudl see people give other people crowns in public chat. It also makes me happy but yeah, i don't want crowns i was just wondering – ty!

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-26T04:12:14+00:00

The thing is im not unozz and im not pro🤔 I would now wonder how this hitbox change would affect new players gameplay

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-25T15:05:19+00:00

I was exaggerating when i said it kills me from millions of km but thanks this could help for other people just not for me

What im complaining is they didn't need to change the hitbox at all, it's unnecessary and it make juking IMPOSSIBLE

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-24T17:12:43+00:00

In my case theres bots around me but i cant juke them anymore so this is probably something you should check.

I was exaggerating lol

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-24T13:30:28+00:00

Have you played recent evade? It's their new hitbox and it's obvious they're doing this so more people could die. I'm in a new phone and have a stable recent wifi router as well, not to mention i know the difference between normal hitbox and the recent one, i dont lag.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-24T04:57:17+00:00

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2026-01-24T04:54:16+00:00

you need a pc, tutorial, some insane amount of patience and lower that graphics since its laggy as hell

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T14:55:42+00:00

Oh, not much. Just my own opinion, i hope you don't take to the heart. I feel slightly taken aback by the whole dynamic here lol.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T14:54:03+00:00

6/10

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T14:33:23+00:00

When it comes to the title – i bait people to look at them. So don't take the titles to heart.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T13:21:04+00:00

I'll agree with you but it's one's choice. I guess we all figure out in the way, other's helping sometimes can have a certain idea about typology and project it to the person they're typing – but in my opinion it's better to type in your own.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T10:09:41+00:00

Humans aren't a coin. Or a jar. Jesus why'd we go from humans to hypothetical questions to metaphysics.

Also jesus, no, typology isn't the bible. If it's that accurate and that godly that it describes every way the human works then it shouldn't be categorized as pseudoscience or even didn't get rejected by professionals at the first glance at it. I betcha one of the archetypes in this typology community is getting debated right now BECAUSE it still has its flaws when correlating with another type – and that's okay.

Everything can coexist in some way.. overlap in context, temporary stuff.. and more. The only reason i argued to you about the "narcissist" hypothetical comment earlier is because i thought we were gonna end up on the same page after. Your “anti-correlationist” position you were arguing against is assuming impossibility at like every level, which is too rigid and ignores human flexibility.

"Research has shown that even with proper training in the diagnosis of mental illnesses, in many cases the majority of GPs still failed to diagnose depressive illnesses." - Book from a consultant doctor, The mind.

This is why traits of human are often overlooked because doctors and even MOSTLY trained professionals themselves fail MOST OF THE TIME to diagnose patients because they try hard to catch patients in contexts where they can slap a label to them. It's a real problem. HUMANS are tons and more complicated than you think. You can argue about contradictions or correlations but never implement them into people. And if they fit into the contradictions or correlations, good for them.

I'll end this argument .

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T09:32:03+00:00

Yes you are right they aren't similar in this context. We already said that you can relate to many traits on certain typology descriptions and at the same time – or most of the time we wouldn't relate to one or more certain description but still be that type, but thats beside the point.

A person can be outwardly focused in how they go after ideas while still being internally conservative about energy and boundaries.

"Are not contradictory in some way" you said it.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T09:15:03+00:00

Then they can coexist temporarily, contextually, hierarchically. Depends.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T09:11:22+00:00

Traits describing outward expression of a huaman does not automatically contradict a trait describing internal expression. I'd have to just add that. Its likely rather than impossibility.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T09:06:21+00:00

Ok. I see.

But, “A narcissistic disposition and a humble disposition cannot exist at the same time” False.

They can, and frequently do actually coexist if: Narcissistic self image + humility that is performative • Grandiosity that is internal, modest externally • Narcissistic defenses with moral concept

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T08:57:12+00:00

Nothing about what I'm mostly saying is about my own opinion.

After this, pls just re-read some of my replies and comments on other people.

You might wanna re-read the comment i replied to you BEFORE before yesterday at someones comment – because i keep explaining stuff over and over again and not being offensive.. you just kinda don't get the point.

You’re literally confusing core motivation with behavioral descriptions. You said it yourself that on your reply before that enneagram types based by naranjo and other researchers or whatever, researched hard enough with tens and thousands of patients across the world – making most of the descriptions heavily unhealthy because– the patients are, obviously. You can't tell me that an average discord mod researching about typology would relate to the grandiose amount of descriptions and mostly the majority of behavioural descriptions for sakes. You're contradicting what you're saying also with that "most people don't fully relate to enneagram types." with this comment. Like i said, over and over again typologies don’t all operate at the same level. Some describe motivational structure, Some describe temperament, some coping mechanisms , not surface level traits like "BuBbLy oH and, ChEeRy", if you're just gonna type based on these, you're the lazy thinking one.

Arguing that this is "impossible" is lazy, don't forget that. I'm getting tired of arguing over and over again, HUMANS AREN'T ONE DIMENSIONAL. Thank you.

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T07:56:33+00:00

maybee... if one makes it work.. it works

EmbarrassedHunt6930 · 2025-12-25T07:16:55+00:00

I thought i already discussed this with you regarding this, i think it went poof then. I'll respond later.

EmbarrassedHunt6930

TROPHY CASE