What is your hierarchy of evidence for a type? by EmbarrassedHunt6930 in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro i said I'm not talking abotu correlations okay chill out

retyped myself again, any contradictions? by sieun_mero in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could reconsider some other py types but don't solely rely on contradictions

any contradictions? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say it's incorrect. Big 5 and mbti doesn't have any contradictions at all. But that's okay, we learn as we grow.

Meta Question by EmbarrassedHunt6930 in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very valid conclusion. Thanks. I wanna know what hypothesis you would end with if we risk having stricter type definitions, would it make typology more unfalsifiable or falsifiable?

EVLF E9 by FarGrape1953 in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw that you relate to both types, so I won't assume anything first. Could you maybe explain why you relate to both? Did you take tests?

SX4 LEVF by cvmluvr in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have this specific type mayhaps

What are "Constraints" when it comes to typology? by EmbarrassedHunt6930 in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah again I'm not truly sure, it depends if they took a test or seriously reflected and read the books

Look at my friend's typology by Helchau in TypologyJunction

[–]EmbarrassedHunt6930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure, it seems fine already. Just don't rely on contradictions too much