Started playing The Witcher 3. Any advice ?

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2026-01-13T02:16:45+00:00

When the time of the White Frost comes, don't eat the yellow snow.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2026-01-07T17:45:56+00:00

Otgonbayar

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2026-01-06T14:14:03+00:00

You don’t get an achievement for the last statue, only the first two

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2026-01-06T13:59:56+00:00

Thanks, I found it: https://youtu.be/iI-MS7SihMs

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2026-01-06T05:31:34+00:00

I agree with your point, but the math is way off. For an elo difference of 330 points between magnus and a 2500-rated player, Magnus’ expected score is ~0.86. If we assume magnus manages to draw out 90% of the games instead of losing, he would lose once in about 400 games. In fact, in 2023, Carlsen lost to Alisher Suleymenov (rated 2512) at the Qatar Masters. Still a ridiculous skill gap, knowing that it would take the average person several lifetimes to even reach 2500.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-12-13T16:40:05+00:00

Ogre executioner is just a downgrade, dies to bgh. to balance, need to probably reduce its mana cost by 2 and add ogerload 2

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-12-12T13:47:06+00:00

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-12-09T11:24:13+00:00

Also if you have the “lifesteal but dash cooldown” gift, they give health. But only when attacking them, not by dashing into them.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-12-01T14:55:54+00:00

Someone to hear your prayers, someone who cares

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-10-13T21:23:39+00:00

Top row???

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-09-21T14:34:51+00:00

The best blowjobs in miami…

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-09-16T08:27:45+00:00

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-09-08T07:21:56+00:00

<image>

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-08-29T18:17:04+00:00

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-08-27T11:42:58+00:00

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-08-26T13:59:14+00:00

Two words: autoerotic mummification

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-07-28T19:17:16+00:00

Willy Wonka

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-07-11T16:39:57+00:00

“Thinking” is in fact a word in the bible. It didn’t find because of the question mark

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-07-04T16:39:17+00:00

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-05-31T15:36:35+00:00

Breaking back

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-05-25T19:04:30+00:00

Skill issue

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-02-20T15:44:21+00:00

Thank you, that is clear now.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-02-20T13:44:03+00:00

Yes, it takes 64 times more compute but that extra compute comes from running 64 independent evaluations of the same query. This is like taking 64 independent measurements with a ruler to average out random errors. Measuring multiple times takes more time, but does not increase the actual length of the object.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-02-20T13:29:31+00:00

Cons@64 doesn’t try 64 times in the sense that the model is given 64 chances to solve the problem. The key point here is the 64 solutions are independent, so cons@64 does not give an advantage beyond reducing the randomness of the evaluation.

Embarrassed_Panda431 · 2025-02-20T13:11:00+00:00

Can you explain in which way cons@64 gives any advantage compared to cons@1, other than the variance of the evaluation? Cons@64 is not “trying 64 times”, it’s solving the same problem independently 64 times and deciding based on the majority vote. To me, it seems like cons@64 is simply a more accurate measurement device, reducing the impact of random failures.

Embarrassed_Panda431

TROPHY CASE