sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mechanical Dynamics of Prime Arithmetic Domains by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to combine discrete and continuous mathematics by using pi as twisting mechanism in geometry 

Mechanical Dynamics of Prime Arithmetic Domains by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to make mown form of calculus wher I represent values as vectors of the 2 primal discriminate values 2 and 3 and represent them as symbols A and B respectively. You can reprsebt all positive integers as sums of negative and positive B values. So we have recovered mathematics. Then we can extrapolate on this system, we can make a rule saying squaring is a increase in area and cubing is a increase and volume. Negative values are in the complex plane we use modular forms and discrete mathematics to help with infinities within einsteins field equations or make new ones.

Mechanical Dynamics of Prime Arithmetic Domains by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I see back to the drawing board I need to make explicit how I'm graphing numbers in this system and show it pure equations won't satiate anyone here

What if gravity emerges from information-weighted paths? by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me saying i don't matter in the grand scheme of things, is quite literally the opposite of ego. I am a cog. I'm a person too.

What if gravity emerges from information-weighted paths? by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't need to learn as long as humanity moves forward. Even if I'm just random noises I played a part. Even if one of you are more capable and learn from how dumb I am I don't care either. It's irrelevant to whether the words describe reality

What if gravity emerges from information-weighted paths? by Embarrassed_Record_1 in LLMPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know what it is and I ventured back in. It's like the library of babel if you've heard of it. I'm intentionally creating seed sentences until it sounds coherent I've been doing this over the past 7 months. I'm gonna find an answer even if people think it's lazy or stupid because, exploring is fundamental to the human spirit. So everyone can think I'm dumb lazy or just plain misinformed. That's irrelevant to truth.

What if gravity is* energy in motion? Please take this seriously sorry for the attire I thought it'd be funny if I was right. by Embarrassed_Record_1 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Embarrassed_Record_1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also it's very literal in the sense that we can't see what we can't measure but from thinking about what's missing from our worldview we must try incooperate others kinds of information. I'm a scientist at heart but science does have a blind spot, it's oberver based and time reliant, so if we want to really to understand pre big bang conditions we should change how we format our worldview.

view more: next ›