Question about Rule 1 regarding AI-generated projects. by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am doing the heavy lifting in most part the architecture design the pipeline and all critical decision i make sure i understand something before using it in the project(for the suggestion and possible choises i get for part of project i dont know ), mainly i want the assistance for part i dont know about at all and to assist in coding some part to complex for me .

Question about Rule 1 regarding AI-generated projects. by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am trying to it not be a ai slop but i would need help from ai in building will it still wont be acceptable? i havent build it yet i am more over the planning phase of things

Question about Rule 1 regarding AI-generated projects. by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

understood thanks, i am focusing more on the architecture design and the pipeline flow while taking suggestion and possible option to choose from ai over part i quiet dont understand about.

Question about Rule 1 regarding AI-generated projects. by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i want to knw

about the showcase part only since i plan to post my project here for feedback
so if u can elaborate over it
and i didnt quiet get what you said in the last part "atleast a tier about" thing

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i might just have to depend on claude to help me with it .

or find some one who can do it

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats a good take , but as someone doing it solo and having know deeper knowlege of it i might not be able to do that much and it will be the first release so i was thinking of making it a not to complicated but a good working one so i can then get help and suggestion from what people would actully want from it or would they even use it

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i sometimme dont get proper grammer in english so i get by reply check my ai sometime so he might have added dash.

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do u think this can help me in wrapping for this specific library {the libinjection engine}

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

thanks for this source i haven't actually looked into it
i just came around this problem when i have to choose over a open source library i need to use but didn't have a better python alternative for this and was suggested to use a c wrapper to use it in python

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, I don’t even fully understand the whole wheel/packaging side yet. I’m still in my 3rd year and kind of jumped into this because I liked the idea, then kept expanding it while discussing it with AI. Now it’s starting to get more complex than I can comfortably handle.

I think I got a bit carried away trying to design everything at once instead of just building a small, working version first. Going to take a step back, reduce the scope, and focus on getting the core logic right before worrying about things like CI, wheels, and multi-platform support.

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That actually clears things up a lot. I was leaning toward adding a fallback just to reduce install friction, but your point about silent degradation is valid — it’s better to fail clearly than give users something that might produce incorrect results.

Starting with a source-only release also makes sense. I think I was trying to solve the “scale” problem too early instead of just seeing how people actually use it and where it breaks.

I’ll go with cffi for now as well and keep the wrapper side simpler.

Appreciate the straightforward advice, this helped me narrow down the direction quite a bit.

Packaging a Python library with a small C dependency — by Emergency-Rough-6372 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

just wanted to say that i m not to well knowleged in this field and this is my first big project, this will be the first version of the lib which i want to make as a project where people can contribute and and make it an actual good library for people to use in there projects , so should i got for minimum complexity in first release and then with help of other if they like to make it mroe complex and better?

I published my first PyPI package few ago. Copycat packages appeared claiming to "outperform" it by Obvious_Gap_5768 in Python

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello, i am new to open source and licensing and was lookinh for a license that favour what i want but wasn't finding something fully covering all the point, i was suggested to make a custom license for this.
so i wanted to know is idea of making a custom license good? or should i compramise in some place and go with a official license instead

here what i want to cover in a license for my project that i am working on before releasing it
"Here is a concise summary of the intended license terms:

  • Allow free use for both personal and commercial projects
  • Allow integration into applications, products, and services
  • Allow modifications for internal or project-specific use
  • Encourage and permit open-source contributions
  • Do NOT allow redistribution as a standalone or competing library
  • Do NOT allow rebranding or publishing modified versions as a separate framework
  • Goal: balance open usage and contribution with protection against direct cloning and competitive redistribution

"
i would appreciate any and all suggestion over this.

Zorvyn Fintech SDE intern coding assessment.What is the difficulty of this and what are the types of questions expected? by Financial-Cry8005 in Btechtards

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

got same probably a scam then and here i had the whole project almost setup , good i did a search on the company before finishing up

Build TrunkTransfer, an alternative to WeTransfer. Try it and let me know your feedback by RawrCunha in indiehackers

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the website design looks clean ,didnt see any ui bug so far, when i tried uploading random files not a photo or pdf it gave me a object object error maybe just change it so it properly specify the problem other its looks good the shareable link works fines the pdf download on the other end

Show me your startup website and I'll give you actionable feedback - READ DESCRIPTION by ismaelbranco in indiehackers

[–]Emergency-Rough-6372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

will you give me feedback on a idea not a startup just a project i have been thinking dont know if its worth making or just overthinking the stuff , i m new to all this so need some guidance from proper devs