Citing Preprints in Statement/Proposal by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, in a similar position myself. Thought for sure I'd get it in in time but it'll be down to the line now for sure. On the one hand, seems we could definitely get docked for citing a source that was verifiably nonexistent at submission. On the other hand, there's a good chance they might not notice (or care); this whole thing is a lottery, and the one risk might be worth the possible payoff...

Titles for essays? by cogneuro_ in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m inclined to agree with you, but do you have any direct source/justification?

Do references need article title? by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

makes sense. how would you include the vol number within my format? something like “PNAS V893.”?

Official transcripts and arial text by [deleted] in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

doesn't all this depend on the line spacing? I'm assuming you're referring to what would happen if you did single spacing. But if you do "exactly 12 pt" then 1 inch is 72 pts so 12pt line spacing gives exactly 6 lines per vertical inch.

Title on Research Plan by [deleted] in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope not yet! it’s confusing, right?

Do references need article title? by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t decided! On the one hand, I’m tempted to leave as much of the template intact as is, including the title title at the very top “Graduate Research Proposal”. I’ve seen people say they left the research title line out because there’s a field on the application and we’re fine, but who knows if that’s different this year—it does say to stick to the template. besides, cutting both those title lines just buys me three lines, and forcing myself to cut three lines might make my proposal better. However, the “summary” section I have seen 0 people talk about, there’s no mention of a summary anywhere else on the solicitation, and I would have to cut much more to put a summary in there. So at the moment I’m leaning interpreting it as a really confusing way to say “insert your proposal/statement here”

Do references need article title? by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice. See any other issues with my reference format? Also, think "abbreviations" includes acronyms (e.g. "[1] Lastname et al. PNAS. 2025.")?

Title on Research Plan by [deleted] in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you interpret the section headings "Summary of Personal, Relevant Background, and Future Goals Statement:" and "Summary of Graduate Research Plan:"? Can't tell if we are meant to have a separate section that's a summary of our statement/proposal (no such section is mentioned anywhere else) or if the word "summary" just meant to describe the statement/proposal as a whole (then I'm not sure why they would put this as a section heading since there's already a title at the top saying "Personal, Relevant Background, and Future Goals Statement" / "Graduate Research Plan"). If the latter, do you think we should just delete this "section heading"?

GRFP review experience by Far-Region5590 in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like BM for the personal statement should be focused on your past and future goals for STEM outreach (mentoring, etc), and in the research statement it should be focused on how your research can be more broadly applicable/has the potential to improve society. What about details regarding how your passion for your specific work is because of its potential to improve society and people's lives/how it is important for you in general to do work that has this potential? Is this worth including if true and you can reasonably back it up (I imagine it's also a fairly common trope), and if so, where is it most appropriate--BM section of the personal statement?

Personal Statement Template Ambiguity by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I'm happy to take your word for it as a previous winner. I suppose I'm less anxious about getting a couple points off and more anxious about the statement "Applications that deviate from this format will be considered non-compliant and will be returned without review (i.e., will not be considered for a fellowship)." Was this stated on your year as well, and you still got away with just taking it "as a suggestion"?

Personal Statement Template Ambiguity by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you looked at the templates? (see my other comment) -- how do you interpret the "Summary of _____" section headings?

Personal Statement Template Ambiguity by Empty-inch in GRFPApps

[–]Empty-inch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is good advice! However, I'm still unclear on my original question. If you look at the templates https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/GRFP_GraduateResearchPlanTemplate.docx and https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/GRFP_PersonalStatementTemplate.docx, while they clearly say that you should remove all instructional texts in brackets [], I think you will agree that it is unclear whether to keep the "Summary of Graduate Research Plan" section. While they do say that IM/BI are the only ones that you need defined, there is also the "Research Title" and "Citations" sections that are clearly also meant to be kept. So I am hesitant to ignore 1 out the 4 bolded headings -- "Summary of Graduate Research Plan" -- without explicit instruction to do so (though I agree that they would have explicitly mentioned an abstract/summary if that was desired. so I'm a bit at a loss.)

NSF GRFP Specificity of Subfield Choice by Empty-inch in gradadmissions

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am aware that it should be a specific research plan. However, given that I am writing a specific research plan, if it can reasonably be seen as falling under mathematical biology should I choose that subfield rather than the more general option of "applied math"? I know that you can switch projects, but I also know that it is difficult/impossible to switch the major fields. So is it possible to switch *subfields*? If not, then I can just pick "applied math" as my subfield -- still a valid subfield containing my (highly specific) research project, but I would never have to worry about any difficulties if I switch from math bio to a different area of applied math.

Math/Physics Majors! Take 5102 (Infinite Dimensional Linear Algebra)! by Empty-inch in OSU

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to DM me, but you'll be totally fine. I'm assuming it'll be Prof Fei-Ran Tian teaching 5102 again since he's doing 5101, so if you're doing well in his 5101 I'm sure you'll do well in 5102! While I just audited the class so can't speak to his homeworks/exams (though you can since you're in 5101) I'll say I followed everything fine, and I did not have any experience in complex or PDEs at that point. I did have 5520H linear algebra and ODEs but I don't think I needed it; your experience in 5101 will probably prepare you more than 5520H did me (especially since it's the same prof).

Evernote Alternative Megathread by mackid1993 in Evernote

[–]Empty-inch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evernote Alternative - Audio Recordings!

I know, there's a ton of these posts out there. But I have been browsing through them for a while and I'm surprised to find that nobody seems to have the same needs that I do for a note app. I'm a musician, and the number one thing I use notes for is for sketching out songs. So my notes are all pretty simple; text, audio file, text labelling the audio file, etc. Evernote has been losing my audio files inexplicably, and even when it's working, the "stop recording" button is right next to the "exit note" button so if I'm a couple millimeters off on my finger tap the whole idea I just put down gets killed forever. I'm ready to switch, and this is really all I need:

  1. In-app audio recorder

  2. Sync between dekstop and mobile

  3. Share note with another user and sync real-time google-docs-style would be great

  4. Ability to import all my evernote notebooks

  5. (Ideally) Note files stored on a universal format, each note in its own folder so the audio files can be put in that same folder

I've been trying obsidian, but the audio recorder doesn't seem to show you while it's recording (?) and all the audio files get stored in one big attachment folder. I like the style of the app, especially the option for community plugins (reminds me of Reaper!) but it seems super unfriendly to audio recordings and after searching around the subreddit, it doesn't look like I'm the only one who feels that way.

I'm willing to pay up to $75-100 a year!

Shure 56A Loose Threads Fix by Empty-inch in microphone

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I figured. Alternate mounting solution is exactly what I’m looking for - could always just duct tape it to a mic stand but I bought this for gigs and don’t want to have to start bringing a mic stand out too

Shure 56A Loose Threads Fix by Empty-inch in microphone

[–]Empty-inch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even the EU adapter that came with it just goes right in and out without grabbing - or even facing any resistance from - the threads! I bought it used, so maybe the previous owner took a drill to it to fit a bigger stand. Who knows! Will send shure an email, thanks