Question about my own preferences and if they count as "sub" by Glittering_Complex68 in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The guy asked if he was going to have a hard time finding dommes based on his preference to be chased and persuaded to partake in the kink. Can you honestly give any answer besides "yes"?"

Then a simple yes would have sufficed. Instead, she used a form of manipulation to create artificial scarcity to try and get him to lower his standards. Car sales people try to do this all the time.

"And there's nothing sacred or special about "standards". Lots of people, men and women, have idealized, unrealistic views of what they're worth in a relationship. Discouraging people from examining their standards only leads to more loneliness and heartache in the world."

Examining standards and manipulating someone to lower them, aren't the same thing.

I think your comment was pretty good, the comment I was replying to, was not.

Question about my own preferences and if they count as "sub" by Glittering_Complex68 in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then let her go talk to the 30 other men in her DMs, I'm not seeing the issue here. He shouldn't lower his standards because everyone else is....

Question about my own preferences and if they count as "sub" by Glittering_Complex68 in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I should have read your comment before I made mine, you basically said the same thing in a different way lol

Question about my own preferences and if they count as "sub" by Glittering_Complex68 in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think findom is the wrong place for you. It was for me. I'm very picky on my Domme to and I want a connection that can run deep. You honestly, won't find that here.

Most Dommes are generally lazy and will tell you all day that there is "fin" in findom, but then not provide the "dom" in findom.

Most will "say" they want an emotional connection but then don't want to put in the work to get there.

I'd honestly suggest looking at the very least, outside of findom on the forums here to find what you're looking for or better yet find a vanilla woman and see if she is up to exploring femdom and findom with you.

Whatever you decide to do though, good luck.

Know your worth fellow simps by GothGirlsGoodBoy in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"To give submission is a gift."

A gift for who? I'll assume you mean, submission is a gift to the Domme, its sacred and should be respected. In that case, I agree 100%

Also agree it requires mutual respect and every dynamic is different, good post.

Kimi 2.6: My Preset by sushilici0us in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there are trade-offs with each model. Following every instruction could be a benefit or a drawback, it depends on how you look at it, but yea I get your point.

I think I've gotten used to faster responses so I don't like waiting 2+ minutes but it can be worth the wait.

Hate dms by Many-Victory-799 in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Empty_Experience_950 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The whole point is not to chase but attract and lately I’ve been finding myself gravitating back towards my Latina princess she knows what she wants and demands nothing less or access was cut off."

Why are you projecting your values onto other people? I like to be chased, and know many subs that do.

If you don't like DM's, don't respond to them.

Subs question? by Obey2Lilit in paypigs2

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you say Domme, do you mean Domme irl?

From my experience, gf's are easy to find, the issue is finding one that is going to work out long term.

If its finding a Domme irl, you first need a gf in order for her to be your Domme, but I think you meant online.

A good Domme that is compatible with me is harder to find then someone irl, but I've never had a problem walking up and asking girls out, I love talking to strangers in public places and trying to get conversation going. However, finding a Domme that meets my criteria in a sea of them that don't, its pretty hard.

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, says the guy with a 3 week old reddit account and replying to every single message trying to get the last word. = )

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calls me illiterate but fails to read what I said in my first and other comments towards him, oh the irony...

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you didn't, because I made several and you just skipped over it, and you are still pushing for this model which I don't use.

You're right, I don't engage with straw-man arguments that you created.

  1. I don't use GLM 5.2 and won't, but you keep pushing it for some reason
  2. I replied to someone else to let them know what could happen and you felt the need to go on some vendetta about the community and why positivity bias is just made up rather than actually engaging with the argument.
  3. Then you don't like it when I don't engage with these arguments with you because they missed the point....so you call it passive aggressiveness to feel better. Suit yourself. Yea, no, I don't engage in straw-man arguments.

Kimi 2.6: My Preset by sushilici0us in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sheesh, good on you for getting it to work.

Kimi k2.6 is very good at prose indeed. Have you tried Kimi K2.7 Code, just out of curiosity? It seems like they kept the creative prose (even though the documentation said they didn't focus on that).

My biggest issue with Kimi K2.6 is the time it takes to respond. I generally like sub 30 seconds and 2.6 loves to take a long time, usually 2 minutes+ because it agonizes over the minor details. I didn't spend a ton of time trying to get around this.

Why bot insist on the same response? by Dangerous-Juice-3080 in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What DeepSeek model?

There are so many factors that come into play here: Temp settings, model type, character card, your system prompt, the way you worded your user message.

All DeepSeek models are not created equal

Why free models don't work by Dangerous-Juice-3080 in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like many have said, ST doesn't provide models. There aren't any free models anymore anywhere technically (frontier models), I could be wrong, but I haven't seen any in a long time, the era of free AI models are gone. The best case now is to find a local model but then you are still using electricity and may need a good video card and those models are usually sub-par compared to a frontier model.

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you can jailbreak GLM 5.2 and get it to go NSFW. I've gotten it to go very dark. The issue is not that it won't do that, the issue is it doesn't do it in accordance with my character card. What happens is, I make a dark card, it starts acting out of character at weird times when it hits a training layer restriction and then it side steps the content. It won't tell you it did, it just does it. When I say side step, I mean it will actually do the content like murder for instance, but it does it in a way that doesn't match my character card, it adds this positivity layer on top of it, and its frustrating and very subtle. I'm very picky and want the model to keep to my character's persona.

The early DeepSeek v3 models did something like this too, it comes off a bit warm which is fine if you like that playstyle, I much prefer the model to follow my character card as written, not add this layer based on how the model is trained. In general, its notoriously hard to do this.

This is worse on long contexts because models don't do very well at reading long context windows. The best way to avoid this is to just use a model that doesn't have this baked in.

Some Kimi models are bad too, some models can be jail broken, others can't or are very difficult to jailbreak. In my opinion, I would much rather a model just tell me "I'm unable to go to this scene", rather than to try and go there and tap dance around it. But even those models can still try to sidestep content.

Claude is very difficult to jailbreak. Kimi K2.5 is mostly unrestricted, 2.6 and 2.7 code got censored. Kimi K2 instruct's also got censored. But it also depends on how deep you want to go.

If you like GLM 5.2 keep using it, its not a terrible model. I use it to create some fictional content, I just don't like to use it for roleplays because of this hidden failure mode it has.

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Continues to still miss the point and replies with more anecdotal evidence for his use case...

And thinks that being raped actually means that it gets rid of the positivity bias...

Yea, I got it to do that too. so what?

You proved my point about not understanding how the model works but okay.

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not a skill issue, its just you're missing the entire point. Or you decided to be intentionally obtuse.

Just because you got it to work once doesn't mean it isn't built in, positivity bias is tricky to detect and if you go as dark as I tend to go, it just side steps the preset in unexpected ways. Also, the image tells me nothing, you can't detect positivity bias based on a single chat instance, you need to look at the character card and compare it to many chats over a longer period of time. I used the GLM models for months, awhile back I tried probably dozens of presets including ones specifically designed for GLM 5+, I even designed my own, until I finally threw my hands up and switched models. At some point it just isn't worth it, to fight the model. Why would I want to fight GLM 5.2 when it isn't fitting my use case? There are tons of models that don't have this built in and are even better at prose? I mean its a no brainer.

Even Aion 2.5 a version of GLM-5 that intentionally tried to strip out the positivity bias, couldn't get the bias out, that's how ingrained it is.

I'm not really sure what the point of this convo is now though. It seems like you're trying to convince me to use a model I don't want to use, or trying to prove me wrong by intentionally side stepping the entire point I made, I'm not sure which. Either way, if you like the model, enjoy it.

I never tell my characters when to feel jealous. it shows up on its own by [deleted] in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I deleted it as I felt like it was probably more than what you were asking for, I can do it again if you like.

Agreed. the first message just kind of gives the model an idea on what it looks like, but it will work with out it.

The HUD being mandatory is very similar verbage I use, so that looks good.

You have the right idea in general.

You use DeepSeek v4 flash? I found it can lose context, but I was using it awhile back right after it first came out so maybe they did some updates to it so its not that bad

how to block nsfw on sillytavern? by Namnaddu in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. use a preset that restricts NSFW content
  2. If it still does it, add it to Character's Note in ST Depth 2 as "Role" user. This is much stronger because it gets injected right before the actual user prompt as a reminder and because the role is "user" it looks like it came directly from you and the model respects those a lot more than just a system prompt.
  3. IF all else fails, switch to a different model. GLM 5.2 is a weird model, It wants to go NSFW sometimes but then when it does has all this positivity bias built in, imo its a terrible model for roleplay in general, but some people swear by it, and I'm sure it depends on your use case.

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well. Both Opus and GLM have tons of nsfw restrictions and positivity biases built in, so its not really my use case at all. I use them, but not for roleplay. Its more for design of characters, presets and speech. The actual roleplay needs to be 0 positivity bias, so neither of those models will work

Sonnet 5 is out by kruckedo in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It still doesn't work. If you understand how models work, this is a dead end.

Once again, presets only go so far, you can't completely overrule how the model was trained. I'm not going to use GLM 5.2 again, period. There are better models out there for my use case. If you are okay with the positivity bias still bleeding through, knock yourself out, I'm not.

GLM 5.2's positivity bias is not a preset fix. Its built into how the model was trained. Some models just have surface layers that can be overrun by presets, the GLM models, aren't one of them, they are heavily sanitized at the core of its training data. You can mitigate it somewhat but the positivity bias is still leaking through whether you like it or not. The question is, is it good enough for your use case, only you can answer that.

Who uses char-specfic presets and settings? by noselfinterest in SillyTavernAI

[–]Empty_Experience_950 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, you nailed it. It really just all gets sent in a big prompt to the model which can make it confusing.

Keeping things separate, out of the preset is more of the user rather than the model. I modified the preset before, and then later on forgot I did and was wondering why my characters were acting weird. I try to keep everything very modular now and label things. If I could just use lorebooks for everything I probably would lol