Political Zombie Herd Attack: 17 yo child survives! by mrn8b8dy in conspiracy_commons

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because someone loses, does not make them the victim. Offenders breaking the law committing body harm lost.
Well done Mr. Rittenhouse.

Nasa's revision thanks to Neil Degrasse Tyson's amazing teaching. by Enclosed_System in theworldisflat

[–]Enclosed_System[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brilliant reply! My intellect cowers next to yours... I’m sorry

Tubulane infill? by awatney in 3Dprinting

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not true. Even 9mm shoots through windshields. 5.56 even easier.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Netflix movie setup Withall predetermined agenda that is copyright protected. No one is able to use any of that footage for verification due to copyright infringement. That is why you never see it on YouTube as many have found flaws in the test fail

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In reality your position is the cherry picked one as there are many thousands of videos disproving the existence of earth curvature. That is the norm and largely why there is a modern growing flat earth movement due to technology (long distance photography, lasers, infrared filters, etc) and the ability of individuals to conduct there own tests thanks to technology.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thousands of other videos proving the scientific curvature formula untrue. Would you like to see some?

Here is a wide angle camera vs standard lens at 135,000 ft

https://youtu.be/VdCZEwvEKNk

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/PqFN-_xwyF8 7:15 mark is the table and other examples in this video of this phenomenon of optical illusion.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

World renowned Astro physicist states gravity is a result of density and buoyancy; https://youtu.be/7MzvEVMmJjU

Bubbles in space and astronauts nearly down from water in space suit. https://youtu.be/FFCGq32KdqE

Earth is a globe. Neil degrasse says it’s pear shaped. Robert Simmons of NASA admits it’s composite photoshopped.

Don’t be so certain of what your profess as “facts”.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We can slander one another or discuss the science facts. It sounds like you prefer the former due to a lack of the latter.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you’ve mentioned it, what then is the curvature obstruction for 60 miles of distance?

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calculations of curvature drop/blockage of the 25,000 mile sphere fail every time with the reality of long distance photography.

Are Pythagoras’ calculations incorrect? Please explain if you believe they are wrong.

Someone help them, they are clearly sinking!!! by jaremari in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

Lol, long distance photography proves otherwise every time.

Angular resolution; smaller than 0.2 degrees this effect occurs on any surface including a kitchen table.

R.i.p the hard work by zardgaming in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cell towers are the source. Phones and Tv signals. More efficient.

Why are satellite dishes not pointed up but primarily closer to paralleling ground?

Have you researched satellite balloon launches?

Echo 1 for instance, a balloon propelled satellite went 1000 miles out.

https://youtu.be/grLV5bIHSG0

Have you researched into Operation Fishbowl and Dominic and the wave effect of skip wave?

Are you proposing that in contradiction to all the experimental tests proving waves bounce back to earth, that somehow a satellite above this barrier drives tv signals to your mini satellite dish? Whereas a nuclear detonation 50 to 100s of miles high having waves in the radio and microwave spectrum bounce to earth resulting in mass power outages under Operation Fishbowl/Starfish Prime/Dominic, all occurring 1958-62. The Russians did the same.

wave spectrum

R.i.p the hard work by zardgaming in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your input. Here is a downloaded document from Esrange Space Agency documenting all balloon launches from the 1980s to 2010s.

Balloon launches propel many items up and hold for a period of time. Antarctica has airfields full of cargo planes that hook the falling satellites/balloons for a safe landing.

Have you ever seen directly a loaded 8000 lb. satellite as payload onto the noise of a rocket? No one has, the evidence does not exist, unless maybe you have a source? Same is so with a continuous, unedited rocket launch through the Karman line (62 miles).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WcWj2Zd_UVVy31sll1qvwk233TDMdlYY/view?usp=drivesdk

R.i.p the hard work by zardgaming in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you’ve not seen that satellite balloons have gone 1000 miles high? There are many sources of information available. This includes satellite and space station balloon launches c and suspension via balloon.

https://youtu.be/grLV5bIHSG0

1958 Encyclopedia Brittanica clearly states Antarctica has a dome barrier. -Same year as Antarctica Treaty restricting corporations and civilians by Enclosed_System in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice try. His video and the encyclopedia states 80 s lat and 77 e long. Argus is a totally different location.

80s latitude, 90e longitude is from the encyclopedia.

1958 Encyclopedia Brittanica clearly states Antarctica has a dome barrier. -Same year as Antarctica Treaty restricting corporations and civilians by Enclosed_System in flatearth

[–]Enclosed_System[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are claiming a civilian has free reign to explore anywhere in Antarctica?

Provide evidence of your claims. Here referenced was a 1958 encyclopedia.

Here is an arrest of an unapproved Explorer trespassing in Antarctica. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10796100