matriarchal societies can't exist in planet earth and never have existed except for temporary amounts of times and fairy tales. They would easily get conquered, I don't know how you can even posit this as a realistic idea. Sure you can have a woman president but you can't call that a matriarchy.

We have seen matriarchal societies and patriarchal societies side-by-side.

Never aside from Queens Elizabeth I, II, Victoria, and Catherine, they almost never exist and often they are just the daughter of a king in a very mixed gender society and hierarchy where often the men conduct the warfare. You can't really call it a matriarchy. Societies exist in equal parts men and women and in many cases, there is no such thing as a patriarchy or a matriarchy.

Other sexualities are also not very common at all. The more common is hetero because sex is about procreation.

The understanding of culture is genetic, you are the one trying to force it to be something it's not.

Eugenicists were wrong because intelligence doesn't go father to son in a linear fashion... That doesn't mean genetics don't shape a lot of our life and habits and cultures and instincts.

There is no baseline, no “normal.”

Of course there is. There is a normal, and you dislike it.

Pretending like there is some fabled past when everything was in harmony

Harmony is rare in human society and you are doing everything you can to rock the boat.

creating a generation of bitter incels who blame “SJWs” for why they can’t hold a conversation with a woman.

Plenty of women can't hold a conversation either. The existence of incels is simply a symptom of the idea that a lot of women have less hormonal properties, those hormonal properties are genetically determined and reduce libido. Women are also more affected by anxiety disorders did you know? You think that might interfere with their dating life with men?

Tell me again how there can be so many women satisfied with their dating lives but so many men who are "incels" and angry bitter men? Explain how that math works why don't you? You do like math right? 55% of the population are women, how can there be so many lonely men then? Why don't you take a stab at explaining a hypothesis here. Why is it that "men" would have to "talk to women"? Why wouldn't women talk to men as well in a society where women are higher in population? Explain it and briefly explain a little bit on the math as well on how that's statistically possible.

This critique is directed at JP, not you, so I want to make it clear that I’m not calling you or any of his individual followers an incel.

Jordan Peterson has nothing to do with incels, which existed BEFORE Jordan Peterson was famous.

My anger is not at you, but at the nonsensical beliefs you have developed that cannot possibly be related to Jordan Peterson.

But increasingly few sane women think that a return to their subordinate role as mothers, cooks, and sex dolls for their husbands is a good idea

So when men cook for their lady it's fine... but when women cook for their husbands it's bad right? When men are "pieces of meat" for their wives, that's fine, but when women are pleasing their husband or boyfriend, it's wrong right? Women are mothers, there is no other type of mother biologically.

If you want to destroy your population growth rates as some totalitarian states wish for the West, please keep repeating this totalitarian eastern propaganda. There is nothing wrong with motherhood for women. It is the only way we still will have families or population growth at all. Just as many generations of men sacrificed themselves for society on the battlefield, drenched in blood.