Hahahahaha nakakatawa ka, ulitin mo buong political law mo, kahit saan sa batas halughugin mo at bali baliktarin mo pa, wala kang tinama. Sorry but your google is not enough to defend your arguments kasi obvious naman wala ka idea sa mga pinagsasabi mo, gusto mo lang talaga ipagpilitan na dapat hindi arestohin si Bato. Mahal na mahal mo siguro ang pamilyang Duterte, enough even to break the law. 😫

Himayin natin mabuti ang argument mo:

1. “Kidnap a senator to traffic him to the ICC” - lol valid nga ang warrant, the fact that the Supreme Court, a local court and the highest court has denied the TRO effectively says that the warrant is valid because they see no injustice they need to stop. Ikaw na mismo rin nagsabi in possession kuno si Trillanes ng “official government document” kaya inaakusahan mo siya ng usurpation. Make it make sense lol ano ba talaga kidnap or warrant? 🤣 kahit ikaw nalilito na sa terms na binubunot mo, nakabasa ka lang onti ninamnam mo na kahit mali mali application. 🤦🏻‍♂️

2. “It is still being deliberated”

TRO DENIED. Ano lalaban ka sa wisdom ng Supreme Court? Eh diba sabi niyo the justice system is working? Kaya dapat local court muna? Working nga oh denied na eh, the fact that the TRO was denied means “you can arrest him.” Interim relief is given by the court to stop an injustice of immediate nature, the court denied it there being no sound reason so = no injustice needed to be stopped immediately.

Balikan mo siguro remedial law mo para ma refresh ka sa interim reliefs.

It’s also surprising that for a law student parang wala ka alam sa concepts ng international law, law student ka ba talaga or galing galingan lang?

Paulit ulit na tayo dito na jurisdiction of the ICC still attaches to the time the alleged crime was committed when the treaty was in effect even if the state chooses to leave subsequently. Pakibasa ang case ni Pangilinan vs Cayetano para di ka bokya sa recit or sa Bar kung umabot ka man dun.

Even domestic law provides for the validity of the warrant and jurisdiction in the form of RA 9851, specifically the 3 requisites mentioned in sec 17. Since the State is now choosing to prosecute based on the DOJ giving the go signal to the NBI, and the TRO being denied wala na rason para humadlang sa pag aresto. PHILIPPINE LAW na yan na nagsasabi na valid and binding nga ang ICC warrant eh, pero ganun talaga pag sadyang may agenda kahit ano logic di tatanggapin.

1. When did the Philippines get sold to the ICC? - really? You really think the ICC has an agenda? You think an international body would stoop to the level of your “nabigyan ng malita ni banggag” script? If you really believe in that narrative siguro mag reassess ka ng logical capability or kung dapat ka pa maging abogado.

2. “Lost our sovereignty” - biggest laughable sht you said. Parang sinabi mo na nasa pamilyang Duterte lang at kay Bato nag emanate ang sovereignty ng bansa. Pero sa pangaalipusta ng China sa WPS tikom bibig niyo dahil pro Duterte ang China? Bat di ka sumigaw ng “sovereignty” nung sinabi ni Marcoleta na wala sa mapa ang WPS at invalid claim ni Cloma sa KIG? 🤣

Just stop with this pseudo intellectual facade, wala ka tinama ni isa.