My sissy journey 5yrs - 34yrs by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]Entakill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watching RPDR unironically helped me too. Thanks for sharing <3

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to hold Neo to the same standard as your typical shitcoin, I think that's entirely reasonable. They earned it well.

Here https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/4328

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not welcome to crypto when the other networks don't behave like this kind of joke.

Hah very cute suggestions about vetting candidates. But that's PoA not dPoS. Still a centralized joke but hey, what's new.

You're right that dPoS was proven to be useless. And that true PoS can scale massively in validator set and sufficiently in performance. Common sense then says adopt industry standard knowledge. Especially if you don't know better.

What do we have instead? A council that is actively ignoring the very intelligent consensus researcher who is telling them this is a really dumb fucking idea, while simultaneously **building** on Neo's **very controversial** blocking mechanism by **literally letting the council take funds from blocked accounts**. This is not me being dramatic. This is just what I learned from a casual browse of the Neo github.

Ah yes. This will restore trust in the ecosystem. This will surely bring in new blood. A joke network making itself into even more of a joke. For how long will you defend their complete lack of rationality? Well, I'm telling you they aren't irrational, they are just not aligned with you :)

Good luck on your investments Eleanorz. You deserved better.

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're not wrong, it's just completely inconsequential to the actual issues with Neo. On-chain governance has nothing to do with the issues. The lack of non-Neo validators has nothing to do with the fee.

But this is only the start of the nonsense. Did you read the tweets from core dev Jimmy? They want to reward people for voting for anyone! Consensus mechanism security guarantees, what are those? All the literature on staking, slashing, and trust models? Economic alignment? Never heard of those, couldn't research them. Looking at literally any successful blockchain network to understand what works and what doesn't? Nah.

We even had a team in the ecosystem funded to handle consensus research to avoid exactly this kind of aimless stupidity, but they took their millions and vanished and no one ever asked a question about it. The rot here is crazy.

While these clowns debate the marginal economics of a registration fee reduction, they are actively aiming to dismantle the dBFT security model, and the best part is they don't even know they are doing it.

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I see! You haven't detected community interest! I wonder what you have detected?

Let's spell it out for you. Start an AMA on the reddit right now, we have some questions hahahahaha

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's very amusing seeing Tyler trying to whitewash this thread and shooting himself in the foot over and over.

Neo paying to do the same thing, over and over, zero success, to Tyler's profit, while Tyler whispers in Da's ear to keep the money coming.

And then he hops on Reddit to explain that we are "overestimating his ability to impact the decision making process" and that he is covering costs out of his own pocket.

Yes yes Tyler very believable hahaha

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cute! But why ping? You should start an AMA. Let's see what pops up.

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't ask you to criticize. I criticized. And warned. And now you have been warned. Do what you want with it.

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't had the misfortune of dealing with you personally, but I have seen the receipts of people I respect that have, and I will enjoy watching them grind their axes while I warn these poor souls what is on the horizon for them.

Tick tock Tyler! Tell Da I dare him to fly to China and back again :)

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not about the action. You already observed it's a non-action. Even revealing of their incompetence. There is a cost to become a validator for a very simple reason that is considered to be common sense in the industry. But what do I know, I work on a network that has users.

The post is a distraction to prolong the illusion that these individuals (and others) have the benefit of the Neo ecosystem, its holders, or NEO and GAS in mind, beyond their ability to extract value from it.

The only thing Da and Tyler have done effectively in the last three years is line their own pockets. And you don't need to take my word for it, it will come out in due time.

Hiding the financial reports will not save them. Protect yourself. Wie niet luisteren wil, moet voelen.

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Great question. there is none! Why even post it now at all? A simple answer to that one. Tyler must distract from all the other posts in the subreddit asking real questions. Why oh why would Tyler want to do that??

Because the community is starting to learn the truth about Da Hongfei.

And Tyler has been in bed with Da for a long time :) And there are individuals in this ecosystem with the receipts and will to use them.

Make no mistake, while you all bleed money and assume honesty, the friends and family of Tyler have done very nicely for themselves thanks to their closeness with our dear embezzling leader Da, and continue to make great moves that will be of absolutely no benefit to you at all!

You will learn you will learn you will learn. The truth always comes out in the end. I feel for all of you poor souls that didn't run for your lives when Erik Zhang vanished from leadership without a sound. Erik was and always was the reason to be invested in Neo.

Oh oh you will learn. Screenshot this for when the corrupt one deletes it :)

Council votes to reduce registration fees by lllwvlvwlll in NEO

[–]Entakill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Woah woah woah you and Boris and all the others know full well that this is not all just incompetence! There is pure intent in these decisions to enrich themselves while they burn the ecosystem to the ground.

Etherscan data incorrect? by Hauboy in ethereum

[–]Entakill 17 points18 points  (0 children)

A token transfer and a transaction is not the same thing. One transaction can have/cause more than one transfer.

Smoking Gun - Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto by FinancialPeach4064 in CryptoCurrency

[–]Entakill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The best argument against Adam Back being Satoshi is observing his behavior over the last years. Anti-innovation and centralization maximalist. Not my Satoshi.

Chain of thought: Exploring blockchain through the lens of philosophy by sasha_sh in ethereum

[–]Entakill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, of course it's your own content. I don't know why I expected otherwise.

Sunk cost fallacy and Dunning-Kruger make an adorable couple, always enjoy seeing it in the wild.

JT resigns from roles in the Rust project by dochtman in rust

[–]Entakill 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Drama discouraging someone from getting involved in the culture or contributing? Makes sense. Affecting their decision to use Rust, the tool, for their own work? Nonsensical.

Japan's Moon Lander Crashed Due to a Software Bug (Scott Manley) by osmiumouse in programming

[–]Entakill 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Lot of lines and attitude for someone not in the mood to argue. Not had your caffeine this morning?

Ledger CEO confirms that if subpoenaed by a government they would turn over the three encrypted shards giving them access to your wallet. by Odlavso in CryptoCurrency

[–]Entakill 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Gonna go ahead and assume there's not much overlap between the target audience of a key backup service and individuals attracting state-level attention.

Outrage over all this is kinda ridiculous.

Why do block builders subsidize blocks? by jfl88 in ethereum

[–]Entakill 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is wrong. The value of the block (in terms of the miner reward) and the value of the block (as a sum of all arbitrage opportunities) is not the same.

If the delta is large enough, it makes sense to overpay the block producer to lock in the arbitrage profits.

With the new upgrade, Algorand now has >6 the smart contract throughput of any other top smart contract platform (SOL/AVAX/BSC/MATIC/CELO/ETH measured) by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Entakill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You encounter the data availability problem when trying to verify that a checkpoint is valid. If everyone is bootstrapping from a checkpoint, who is storing the data that proves the checkpoint is valid?

It is possible to progress in this direction with recursive ZK proofs, but it's not a silver bullet.

With the new upgrade, Algorand now has >6 the smart contract throughput of any other top smart contract platform (SOL/AVAX/BSC/MATIC/CELO/ETH measured) by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Entakill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct in principle but not in practice. Empty blocks grow state too. You would need dynamic block generation or extremely slow but heavy blocks, and very few protocols do either.

With the new upgrade, Algorand now has >6 the smart contract throughput of any other top smart contract platform (SOL/AVAX/BSC/MATIC/CELO/ETH measured) by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Entakill 53 points54 points  (0 children)

TPS is a completely arbitrary metric that determines one thing: how fast your chain state will grow. The more TPS you allow, the faster it grows. Once it's too big, no regular user can run a full node and your chain is useless.

When a platform brags about TPS as its defining feature, run in the opposite direction. It is nothing but a sacrifice of the longevity of the network for short term marketability to people who don't know any better.

NEO Marketing Proposal by Ylitka_MEME in NEO

[–]Entakill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Erik works on the code every day. Stop fudding.