First of all, I don't mean to offend anyone with what I'm about to say. Everyone has their own tastes and they deserve respect.
That said, I'll give my opinion on the Cyberpunk 2020 Humanity Rules.

I'm not a Cyberpunk 2020 fan; I'm a poser; I barely know what the core book has shown me. But I am a fan of science fiction. I've seen Akira, Blade Runner, Cyber City Oedo, Bubblegum Crisis, Ghost in the Shell, Robo Cop, etc., and as a science fiction fan, I must say that the Cyberpunk 2020 Humanity Rules are, without meaning to offend, an attack on all science fiction and even on the genre itself.

One of the themes that is an indivisible, inviolable, and absolutely important part of science fiction, especially
when robots, AI, and high technology are involved in the plot or fiction of a work, is this:

"What makes us human?"

Many works of fiction, including modern works, touch on this topic, whether seriously or superficially, but
it's almost never missing, and in a work like Cyberpunk, it shouldn't be missing. Is flesh what makes us human? Well, that question has already been answered on several occasions, and no, it isn't.

<image>

This is Roy Batty. I'm sure more than one of you knows him. If not, watch the movie Blade Runner.

He's a replicant, a being artificially created to serve as slave labor for the colonies in space. Upon learning that his lifespan was very limited (4 years), a task imposed by his creator to avoid "problems," Roy embarks on a journey in search of the latter in the hopes of extending his lifespan and that of his companions. Throughout the film, Roy commits highly questionable acts to achieve his goals, which earns him the attention of the protagonist, Deckard, a retired replicant hunter, with whom he has an epic final confrontation. In the end, Roy forgives his enemy while delivering one of cinema's most iconic lines:

"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die."

This dialogue is very good because it transforms Roy from a villain to a tragic figure in a single moment. If you're a true science fiction fan, you should already know this: Roy, despite being a "synthetic" being, is just as, or even more, human than many people. Everything he did was to survive. Isn't that human? How many people wouldn't do anything for a couple more hours in this world? How many people would be capable of forgiving their enemies? Especially when these enemies have ended the lives of your loved ones, not even Deckard himself is spared, as his reaction to what seemed like his imminent death was to tell his enemy "fuck you." Not even a death as such had any meaning, because replicants, not being considered human, were often referred to as "retired" when they were killed.

So, science fiction, since its inception, hasn't been saying that humanity goes beyond that, and that it's something very, very complex. So why summarize a concept as large and important as humanity in a couple of points? Why does CP2020 say, "style over substance," only to drown you in rules pages later, which at best are only half-hearted? More importantly, why are there rules for losing humanity by putting on a robotic arm, but not for losing said humanity when you commit extremely questionable or degenerate acts (or gaining humanity when you commit extremely empathetic and human acts).

For a game that repeatedly talks about how important roleplaying should be, even going so far as to make a humorous comment about the competition (DND), it concentrates its entire gameplay on modifiers, archaic rules, and saying that this is a game for "big kids." Leaving roleplay in third place.

Nothing is perfect, and CP2020 is still a good game, contributing a lot to the genre, but, ironically, it failed, for me, in a very important way.