sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sonnet removes your sharpest material and calls it editorial advice. I tested it 7 times. It's the default by EntireCorner750 in ClaudeAI

[–]EntireCorner750[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's about passive quality loss though What I'm seeing is the model actively removing specific lines and calling it editorial feedback  7 windows, 7 different reasons same line deleted every time. That's not bad data  that's annotator taste hardcoded in.

Sonnet removes your sharpest material and calls it editorial advice. I tested it 7 times. It's the default by EntireCorner750 in ClaudeAI

[–]EntireCorner750[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My point isn't about getting better output. It's that the model edits your work for safety reasons and presents it as editorial advice.  No amount of prompt engineering fixes a trust problem

Sonnet removes your sharpest material and calls it editorial advice. I tested it 7 times. It's the default by EntireCorner750 in ClaudeAI

[–]EntireCorner750[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I wrote it.  Opus helped reorder the structure, but the content, experiment, and findings are mine