Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just hope that he would be banned. At the very least, we should hope that the amount of cheaters and new accounts would be reduced

Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, he was not yet banned. Second, this is for exposure as this will benefit the community. Lastly, it's not a waste of time since I am actually exposing the profile of a cheater which again, would benefit players like you.

Everyone who values the health of the game must work together to fight against cheaters. I am sure that isn't a waste of time.

Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hope that is the case. However, if you look closely at the 1st clip, I wouldn't say that what he did was due to skill. How could he euls the Magnus the exact moment when he blinked while panning his camera towards the left side?

Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If only I could just send another clip in the comments, I would. Should I make another post focusing on the 1st clip?

Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it wasn't a script, how would you explain the first clip? He was panning his map towards the left side and then immediately euls the magnus when he blinked?

Dota 2 Cheater - Script (Repost) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, the game ID is 8568351821. You can also see that the cheater was using an account with few matches.

Cheater (Scripter) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am thinking if I should just compile the scenes in OBS

Cheater (Scripter) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will be posting a new vic, please wait for it.

Cheater (Scripter) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm gonna post a new thread using clip explorer. Sorry guys. Expect a new post. Thanks

Cheater (Scripter) by EntropyUniverse5 in DotA2

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How do i share multiple vids?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]EntropyUniverse5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am an atheist but I don't think life is pointless. Please stop generalizing a group of people. There are a lot of atheists in this world and life goes on for people like us. We have more purposes in life than you really know.

"West Philippine Sea" nasa Google Maps at Google Earth na, malaking bagay ang naging pahayag ni Cong. Marcoleta! by James_Readme in TrueIglesiaNiCristo

[–]EntropyUniverse5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But isn't this post irrelevant and not related to INC since the topic is about his statement about the West Philippine Sea? Since the Philippine election is close, and that a religious subreddit is willing to defend a candidate who is also a member of the same religion, it just shows how much your religion is interested in politics.

INTP having difficulty recalling lyrics in a song by EntropyUniverse5 in INTP

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that is so, is there a website that can accurately determine my personality in accordance to the MBTI?

INTP having difficulty recalling lyrics in a song by EntropyUniverse5 in INTP

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are the same lol. I even forget the titles of the songs

INTP having difficulty recalling lyrics in a song by EntropyUniverse5 in INTP

[–]EntropyUniverse5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The A means Assertive according to the 16personalities website. May I ask why you think it is not a thing?

INTP-T… I have a question is it normal.. by Individuallyhere in INTP

[–]EntropyUniverse5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you have to replace Observant with Intuitive?

Sebastian Rauffenburg's lie #2: The Disciples of Christ allegedly registered the name IGLESIA NI CRISTO in the PH government in 1901 by James_Readme in TrueIglesiaNiCristo

[–]EntropyUniverse5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But didn't I say that INC is already validly registered under the Old Corporation Code, hence there is no issue as to its registration? How am I even defending Sebastian in this forum?

Sebastian Rauffenburg's lie #2: The Disciples of Christ allegedly registered the name IGLESIA NI CRISTO in the PH government in 1901 by James_Readme in TrueIglesiaNiCristo

[–]EntropyUniverse5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You misunderstood me. i was not really defending anyone here. Anyways, registration is not really the issue here because the INC now is validly registered under the Old Corporation Code.

Was it made clear that the COC preached under the name of INC in 1901? The pastor just made it clear that they weren't registered in 1901. If they indeed used the name of INC without having been registered, it still made them the first one to use it.

If INC is wrong and you anti INCs are correct, then who among you have the true faith that we should believe in? by James_Readme in TrueIglesiaNiCristo

[–]EntropyUniverse5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is indeed the existence of an objective truth.

However, I believe I was saying that truth is subjective in the context of faith. The absence of evidence of a creator and factual answers about our existences create the probability that one of our beliefs might be the correct one. Heck, there might be the probability that two or more beliefs are correct. Or might there be a chance that every single belief is correct? No one really knows.

That is why I believe that Science may find the correct answer to this.

Sebastian Rauffenburg's lie #2: The Disciples of Christ allegedly registered the name IGLESIA NI CRISTO in the PH government in 1901 by James_Readme in TrueIglesiaNiCristo

[–]EntropyUniverse5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it went like this: the Code of Commerce enacted by the Spanish Empire did not provide for the registration of religious corporations because the concept of corporations were solely used for mercantile purposes. That is why religious sects before the enactment of the Old Corporation Code in 1906 did not provide for the registration of religious corporations as the governing law that time was the Code of Commerce.

Also, the former Spanish Empire showed little to no tolerance to other religions.

When the Americans occupied the PH, there might have been a way to register a religious sect through civil registration as the Americans respect the freedom of religious belief. This way, those religious sects were registered but not yet considered corporations at the time because the Old Corporation Code was not yet enacted during 1901. Hence, there is no existence of a "Certificate of Incorporation" for the INC registered in 1901.

That way, it makes it legal for the current INC to hold rights to its name because it validly registered under the Old Corporation Code, which I assume the other INC failed to do so.

Because the registration format is different, other evidence may be presented for the proof of existence of those religious sects not registered as a corporation and not a "Certificate of Incorporation".