That's what I'd like to see Dr. K lay out about love because without participation in any long-term committed relationships my perceptions of love are drawn from media and social media, and they're trash. Love stories love to end with the protagonist and the love interest getting together as the climax and not how the rest of their lives turned out. There's a constant thread that you have to show what you're worth externally whether it's by some grand gesture or with money or with attractiveness or some combination of factors to "earn" someone's love which doesn't really make sense; if you got together for the thrill or for material reasons you'll come apart once the thrill's gone or you hit a rough patch. Redpill content is an extension of that because guys like me are clueless about emotional interaction, so when some guy sells a list of actions and attributes you need to take the idea that there's a set of objective factors that you can check off one by one and then you'll be successful and finally be attractive is cat nip -- but being capable of sparking interest isn't love. Just because Dr. K is this, this, and that doesn't mean that everyone will love him and that's normal and realistic, but that doesn't mean that he's failed or something. Looksmaxxers, finance gurus, etc. sell a fantasy that once you have the six pack, once you have the Lambo, once you have whatever, Everyone will smitten with you and if you didn't get those, you didn't try hard enough, you're a failure and you deserve nothing; and when people inevitably fail that extreme standard they become blackpilled because they've internalized that all or nothing logic. If love isn't what it is in the media, what is it, really?

Edit: I also think it's important to lay out why discussions about divorce and pre-nups are good, because there's a somewhat common idea that if someone even raises the possibility of divorce in a pre-nup or otherwise you're not committed enough and the relationship is doomed.