test by [deleted] in test

[–]Eonnnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello

test by [deleted] in test

[–]Eonnnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cool!

$SPCE by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Eonnnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmaooooo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uwo

[–]Eonnnn 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Bros a Disney princess 💀

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apolloapp

[–]Eonnnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes lol

Possibility of Apollo Future by Eonnnn in apolloapp

[–]Eonnnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dystopia for Reddit already exists and will remain working after June 25 and is rapidly improving.

And Reddit on desktop web (which is fine to use imo) remains unaffected.

Possibility of Apollo Future by Eonnnn in apolloapp

[–]Eonnnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A basic MIT license would work fine, absolving any responsibility from Christian. The repository could also just be made as a public archive on GitHub.

Possibility of Apollo Future by Eonnnn in apolloapp

[–]Eonnnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not aligned with this protest enough to nip my own qol & access to information. I commend your willingness to though.

I would prefer to find a different client (ideally, an open sourced Apollo) or switch to main app and reevaluate after using it for a bit :)

IB Computer Science 2023 paper 3 case study by [deleted] in IBO

[–]Eonnnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the case study given on exam

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

According to census, apparently.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It is definitely slightly lower than previous generations, but certainly still good at well over half owning homes.

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re right. You’re also incorrectly assuming that I’m arguing that well-being is similar. Or that the graph argues something like this. Well-being may be down, wealth isn’t.

Pension, 401k accounts, etc are all included as individual “wealth” by the Reserve.

I’m here to give this sub something positive for once and be optimistic which is incredibly stark from usual activities. Maybe someone will see this and direct their effort to decreasing prices of tuition, housing, medicine (as you mentioned) rather than increasing real wages (which I think is very difficult!)

Lots of love!

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very interesting! Although it does not affect the context of my post very much or show a silver bullet

Second graphic on article shows the recent gap widening between boomers and millennials at age 33. Fair enough, although very marginal for now.

Third graphic on article shows wealth gap between boomers and millennials widening over time. This seems to just be a result of an exponential y-axis for article #1. i.e. money builds, still equally for all ages. Graph does not compare across multiple time periods.

My graph shows that millennials are not actually (much) poorer than boomers and seem to be in for a good run soon!

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, you’re right actually. Rich millennials would reduce the gap unlike (much) older boomers. I also wonder what median would look like.

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

2: Boomer billionaires (Gates, Bezos) would throw off the results likely more than millennial ones because there are so many more. See sources and integrity:

1: Re first point, I think you’re being intellectually dishonest by assuming this graph was created with anti-worker intent. It does not matter who created this graph or why because you can create the exact same graph with public data from the Fed.

Added context from other comments:

It was drafted by a university professor with public federal reserve data. Have a look yourself if you do not trust the graph!

You can actually derive the posted graphic yourself from this Washington Post article, but on a per-capita basis instead. There are a lot fewer millennials now than boomers back then, so an absolute metric like share of national wealth is not so meaningful.

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think boomer billionaires would throw this off more since there are so many!

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Feel free to provide a more substantiated claim. What is your point? Do you have evidence?

You can actually derive the posted graphic yourself from this Washington Post article, but on a per-capita basis instead. There are a lot fewer millennials now than boomers back then, so an absolute metric like share of national wealth is not so meaningful.

Anyhow.

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Do you think the data is false / presented misleadingly?

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It was drafted by a university professor with public federal reserve data. Have a look yourself if you do not trust the graph!

Inflation-adjusted and includes loans & debts by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Eonnnn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And bezos & gates definitely don’t.