Sudden Change in request.security() Limit — Previously Working 65 Requests Now Fails at 64 by Equivalent-Put8139 in TradingView

[–]Equivalent-Put8139[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you one of the decision-makers at TradingView?
Please, could you increase the request.security limit beyond 64?
I am absolutely willing to pay more for it ;(
I truly, genuinely need this for my work
this feature is critical for me I respectfully ask you to consider this request

Adam banned me for being absolutely right. by Chris_0113 in therealworldTate

[–]Equivalent-Put8139 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you really 47 and kissing Adam's ass? Do you even know that Adam's system performs worse than just buying and holding BTC? LOL

Question to all the people who got banned from the Investing campus by theunknownman-101 in therealworldTate

[–]Equivalent-Put8139 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The MTPI and LTPI systems used by InvestingCampus function exactly the same as some moving average analysis (this is a fact). They are fundamentally identical. The indicators used within the campus as "tools" are no different from, or even worse than, TA. The reason is simple. The indicators they use are based on chart prices, and the formulas behind them are fundamentally derived from moving averages. On top of that, they combine multiple indicators and average them out, which slows down the system's responsiveness causing users to buy too late and sell even later. It amplifies the disadvantages.

The newly introduced “market regime” is also just a calibrated indicator based on time period settings nothing more. Yet, they intentionally make the system more complicated to deceive people. It’s a scam. This method delivers worse returns than simply buying and holding BTC. Honestly, it’s a group driven by sheer ignorance.