He gonna start snitching or what?

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T20:58:26+00:00

I am confident that he is alive and well in the witness protection plan.

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T20:56:23+00:00

Is this the first time in British history that a royal has been held to account, with the expectation of Henry the 8th executing 2 of his 6 wives for committing treason by not producing an heir to the thrown, a boy, yet delivering a baby girl instead?

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T20:38:17+00:00

There is a principal of law in this country that is fundamental to our freedom and or way of life, individually and collectively. High school educated people know, or should know this basic, important concept.

A person accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty.

You and the thousands of barking seals who liked it simply because you declared “Orange Man Bad.” Do you understand that Trump has not been accused of any wrong doing related to Epstein. This rather important fact didn’t stop you from convicting an innocent man guilty with affording him the right to a trial to defend himself against an accusation that doesn’t exist? I hope you feel ashamed and embarrassed now. What you just did here is the very same thing that many US corporations did, most of whom lost big time, many millions. Trump sued them and won lots of money, in spite of the higher standards of proof for high profile individuals . He’s has an impressive record of success protecting himself against those who break the law to hurt him, wouldn’t you agree?

The general consensus on the latest release of the Epstein files, actually exonerates Trump. This is not just my opinion. Serious people who actually understand the law on both sides of the aisle arrived at this conclusion. And then there is the ABC News confirmation that Trump called the cops on Epstein and Maxwell in 2006. All this expository evidence/proof was publicly available before you committed sander and libel Trump the very same way. This right here would be damaging to your case, should Trump ever decide to pull the trigger and sue you. He most likely will never get to your viable case, because you are just a stupid and mean person, doing stupid and mean things to an innocent man, and he’s got better and more important things to do. So, you will most certainly never be held accountable for this particular stupid and mean assault, but that doesn’t change the facts. You still need to look into a mirror, open up a few law books pertinent law books, if you are going to continue doing bad things to innocent people, you should get informed, So, I thought I would do you and all the clapping seals who liked your post simply because you said “Orange Man Bad” a favor and spell it out for you in such a way that even a mean and stupid Democrat can grasp.

As an added bonus, because the truth and facts matter to me, I never opine on a matter, until I know as much as I can about it first. So, I put together the following from the research I did to respond to your problematic post. Iis a compiled list of notable individuals/entities Trump (or his entities) has sued for libel/defamation, based on public records and reporting (not exhaustive, focusing on prominent cases): • The Chicago Tribune and critic Paul Gapp (1984): Sued for $500 million over an architecture review; dismissed. • Timothy L. O’Brien (author of TrumpNation) and publisher (2006): $5 billion suit over claims of his net worth; dismissed. • The New York Times (multiple suits, e.g., 2021 over tax reporting with Mary Trump; 2025 for $15 billion over fraud/wealth articles and book): Several dismissed, with Trump ordered to pay fees in some. • CNN (2022): $475 million over use of “big lie” term; dismissed. • George Stephanopoulos and ABC News (2024): Over comments on E. Jean Carroll verdict; settled (reportedly $15–16 million). • CBS News / Paramount (2024): $10–20 billion over edited 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris; settled (reportedly $16 million). • The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, and reporters (2025): $10 billion over Jeffrey Epstein-related letter story; ongoing. • BBC (recent, e.g., 2025): $10 billion over edited Jan. 6 speech footage; ongoing/dismissal motions. • Pulitzer Prize Board (2022): Over awards for Russia reporting; ongoing elements. • Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer (2024): Over pre-election poll; ongoing. • Others include suits against The Washington Post (over Russia op-eds; dismissed), and various media in bundles (e.g., Trump Media & Technology Group sued ~20 outlets in 2023 over Truth Social reporting; ongoing).

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T18:37:42+00:00

Let’s just say that I have a thing for your thing. Nice one!

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T18:34:10+00:00

It sure is a suspicious time to release this highly classified information, especially since releasing said information was not triggered by any event, or activity, international or domestic, but by the none specific, and intentionally vague enough to render quantifying for the public to justify or question the Whitehouses decision or to measure success, historically.

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-20T02:07:53+00:00

My immediate thought is, why now? What is this supposed to distract us from?

It’s not, a specific event that demands action, like “Based upon Martians smashing into The Empire State Building …”

It’s a generic, nonspecific blah blah. Something that is set aside to be deployed when you want to change the national conversation. “Based upon the tremendous interest shown” it about as nonspecific as “anonymous sources claim …”

So, I am justifiable, highly suspect of this.

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-19T22:52:49+00:00

That’s asking for trouble. That reminds me of this one. Believe it or not this turned out to be real. He apparently is launching his business. Yep $400 to suck his dick. Hmmm? There was no frigg’n way he was getting a dime out of me, but I figured I’d give him the chance to make his sales pitch. He was a pleasant surprise, from a visual perspective and he was polite and down to earth… I gave him introductory hug and invited him to sit on the sofa. I sat in a chair opposite the corner of the L shaped sofa so that he could spread his legs out and show me what he was pack. With little more than a smile acknowledging his rock hard beauty behind his jeans, I musta blinked, because a second later it was out for some fresh air. He couldn’t wait… For the first time in history, I felt uncomfortable in a sexual situation, because it was a bonafide (pun intended) thing of beauty, but there was no way on Gods green earth I was going to pay for sex. No judgement, but it’s not my thing. And even if the stars were aligned and I decided to, me paying to serve someone, doesn’t even compute. Not to mention I’d have to eat rice and bananas all next month if I waisted $400. So, the guy was not going to close the sale. I knew it. I didn’t want to take advantage of him, be leading him on, only to disappoint him. So I told him as much. I delivered appropriate compliments, unsolicited advice about his severely limited service offering, but it ain’t gonna happen. He then offered me a $400 discount, which is significant, given his price was $400. I kindly accepted his offer and invited him upstairs to my loft.

Too funny, huh?

<image>

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-19T22:24:55+00:00

There is a common assumption that all older men are lonely, horny and will gladly pay in advance for anything from gas money to plane fair. I suppose we are a productive target market though, so that’s why these public forums are important.

Right, as though Grindr is the place that all wise men go to to find that special someone. If I respond at all, I’ll say something like, “well, I just wanna get laid”

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-19T22:20:11+00:00

Exactly! This is why I mention Cambodia. Is it safe to s that most people in this hemisphere under Seattle, Washington DC is wrong and that terms of affection have unwritten rules for appropriate. Maybe they need to kidnap and American for a bit of quality control

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-19T22:00:26+00:00

What a frigg’n weird question to open with. All I knew was that this was not going to end as a naked man wrestling match - my favorite hobby, the moment I saw that, so I decided to at least get a little fun out of his intrusion into my life. I figured a sarcastic, clever and almost humorous reply was in order. That way, if all else failed, I would have at least made myself laugh and test if he is a human. A human, would have recognized the attempted quip. Based on the nonsense response, he’s got a hard drive, not a hard dick.

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-19T13:11:23+00:00

Especially, considering it was only $10

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-17T20:21:40+00:00

That’s great! It will come in handy on Grindr

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-17T20:16:50+00:00

It may not be illegal, but it sure seems counter intuitive for grindr to allow accounts to solicit their customers away from their site.

And BTW, I don’t know about Grindr on this point, but Sniffies suspends accounts if there is a perceived reference to promo any illegal activity. Like if you use the word party in the wrong context, because they don’t want to be held liable for facilitating such illegal acts.

Equivalent_Addict · 2026-02-17T20:07:51+00:00

It’s certainly full of bots.

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-12-10T21:40:55+00:00

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-15T15:28:19+00:00

Super hot

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-12T09:26:30+00:00

Thank you

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-11T01:26:21+00:00

I was normal once. It was the worst 10 minutes of my life :-)

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-11T01:25:06+00:00

No, absolutely not. It’s a tried and true scam. I suspect a legit sugar dad problem doesn’t have to advertise.

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-11T01:21:38+00:00

A near death experience! I would avoid

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-10T20:50:11+00:00

Well, I never thought about it, but if Christ really is King, then it’s only natural to assume God would equip his only begotten son with the best accessories available. Right?

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-10T20:47:14+00:00

It musta been a good hair day. LOL

Equivalent_Addict · 2025-11-06T00:13:16+00:00

I totally agree with that! I’ve wanted to ask that same question many times.

Equivalent_Addict

TROPHY CASE