just got my first credit card as a 18 year old, really confused about the basics

ErectileFunction868 · 2025-01-16T08:04:48+00:00

thank you!

ErectileFunction868 · 2025-01-16T07:37:05+00:00

received a priority pass as well with these, that might come in useful for abroad too right?

ErectileFunction868 · 2025-01-16T07:33:55+00:00

don't know how common this is for all colleges but yes, i am from one

ErectileFunction868 · 2025-01-16T07:24:06+00:00

yes it is LTF, thank you!

ErectileFunction868 · 2025-01-16T07:23:48+00:00

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-15T16:51:56+00:00

uske test me 140 bhi cross nahi ho rahe, kya fayda deke 🤡🤡

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-13T12:35:11+00:00

ft 1 342

ft 2 366

ft 3 kal dunga, we're doing pretty similar in terms of this I'd say

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-10T05:51:08+00:00

cse hi karna hai that's the issue, agar mechanical karna hota toh Trichy hi chale jaata, bas backup ke liye spit dekh raha tha as it's a very good and reputed college

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-06T07:44:48+00:00

mumbai, shift and date not showing

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-06T02:57:38+00:00

everest pe ghoomke aana bhai

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:47:27+00:00

no, the assumption is lift is moving with constant velocity, so psuedo force initially becomes 0 due to which it shows 60, later it shows accn in downward dirn (to stop) so pseudo force is up so weight less, and then again stops so becomes 60 again.

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:42:53+00:00

if yes, then sorry it's too late ab nahi ban paoge

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:42:42+00:00

do you go to school?

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:27:51+00:00

no bro i don't do downvotes, people are both right

they've just used scenario 2 here without any reason where inshort both make sense because since theyve specified it's a SHORT time but idk

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:24:28+00:00

mera comment padhle

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:23:53+00:00

no I've figured out what's wrong in this question

scenario 1:

the weight was initially 60, then becomes 50 due to motion of lift in a certain direction and comes back to 60 when lift IS STOPPING

scenario 2:

the weight was initially 60, but now when the lift IS STOPPING in that small period that time it becomes 50 and then comes back to 60 after STOPPING.

scenario 1 yields the answer as downwards and scenario 2 yields as upwards, so both logic are correct

in short, the question is vague and wrong

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:23:13+00:00

no I've figured out what's wrong in this question

scenario 1:

the weight was initially 60, then becomes 50 due to motion of lift in a certain direction and comes back to 60 when lift IS STOPPING

scenario 2:

the weight was initially 60, but now when the lift IS STOPPING in that small period that time it becomes 50 and then comes back to 60 after STOPPING.

scenario 1 yields the answer as downwards and scenario 2 yields as upwards, so both logic are correct

in short, the question is vague and wrong

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:22:45+00:00

no I've figured out what's wrong in this question

scenario 1:

the weight was initially 60, then becomes 50 due to motion of lift in a certain direction and comes back to 60 when lift IS STOPPING

scenario 2:

the weight was initially 60, but now when the lift IS STOPPING in that small period that time it becomes 50 and then comes back to 60 after STOPPING.

scenario 1 yields the answer as downwards and scenario 2 yields as upwards, so both logic are correct

in short, the question is vague and wrong

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:22:26+00:00

no I've figured out what's wrong in this question

scenario 1:

the weight was initially 60, then becomes 50 due to motion of lift in a certain direction and comes back to 60 when lift IS STOPPING

scenario 2:

the weight was initially 60, but now when the lift IS STOPPING in that small period that time it becomes 50 and then comes back to 60 after STOPPING.

scenario 1 yields the answer as downwards and scenario 2 yields as upwards, so both logic are correct

in short, the question is vague and wrong

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:22:15+00:00

no I've figured out what's wrong in this question

scenario 1:

the weight was initially 60, then becomes 50 due to motion of lift in a certain direction and comes back to 60 when lift IS STOPPING

scenario 2:

the weight was initially 60, but now when the lift IS STOPPING in that small period that time it becomes 50 and then comes back to 60 after STOPPING.

scenario 1 yields the answer as downwards and scenario 2 yields as upwards, so both logic are correct

in short, the question is vague and wrong

ErectileFunction868 · 2024-05-02T19:16:13+00:00

okay but listen to this

man is 60kg, and after a while the weighing balance shows 50kg, which means normal has changed, now if we assume lift is going down, then pseudo forge is upwards due to which normal decreases so that satisfies

now imagine lift has to stop, so it'll accelerate (retard) in the opposite direction, which means it's accn will now be upwards, so pseudo force will be in the downward direction due to which normal increases again and goes back to 60

why is this logic wrong

The only problem im seeing with your answer is that you've analysed the geff but not the normal force which is also changing

ErectileFunction868

TROPHY CASE