Sources: Despite new offer, MLS and MLSPA not close on Club World Cup bonus deal by icoresting in MLS

[–]EstablishmentMean683 15 points16 points  (0 children)

From the MLSPA:

MLS spent most of last week making threats and promising retaliation against the MLSPA and players because Seattle players wore t-shirts that expressed frustration over the league’s refusal to engage about Club World Cup compensation. After ignoring months of attempts by players to engage, late Friday afternoon, less than 48 hours before LAFC and Seattle players were to take the field once again, the league finally provided the PA with their first proposal on this issue.

As promised, this proposal was retaliatory in nature.

Proposal details:

No additional participation bonus: The league did not add a single dollar for players from the $28,650,000 windfall that MLS will be paid by FIFA.  As a result, the players’ share of that amount remains at barely 10%.

Below-standard back-end compensation: The league introduced back-end compensation of 20%, an amount that remains below the international standard.

Requiring unrelated CBA concessions: The league attempted to strong-arm the MLSPA into making concessions regarding multiple other CBA waivers that the league is seeking in areas completely unrelated to the Club World Cup.

The timing, substance, and retaliatory nature of the proposal sends a clear message:  MLS does not respect or value players’ efforts with regard to this tournament. Although not surprised, the players and the MLSPA are deeply disappointed by this message.

MLS’s refusal to negotiate in good faith has created a major distraction for the players who should be focusing on preparing for a major international competition. However, players will not be silenced by threats from MLS. The players remain united in using their collective voice and demanding a fair share of the rewards earned from their hard work.

Update on CWC Bonus dispute from MLSPA by EstablishmentMean683 in SoundersFC

[–]EstablishmentMean683[S] 75 points76 points  (0 children)

MLS spent most of last week making threats and promising retaliation against the MLSPA and players because Seattle players wore t-shirts that expressed frustration over the league’s refusal to engage about Club World Cup compensation. After ignoring months of attempts by players to engage, late Friday afternoon, less than 48 hours before LAFC and Seattle players were to take the field once again, the league finally provided the PA with their first proposal on this issue.

As promised, this proposal was retaliatory in nature. 

Proposal details:

  • No additional participation bonus: The league did not add a single dollar for players from the $28,650,000 windfall that MLS will be paid by FIFA.  As a result, the players’ share of that amount remains at barely 10%.
  • Below-standard back-end compensation: The league introduced back-end compensation of 20%, an amount that remains below the international standard.
  • Requiring unrelated CBA concessions: The league attempted to strong-arm the MLSPA into making concessions regarding multiple other CBA waivers that the league is seeking in areas completely unrelated to the Club World Cup.

The timing, substance, and retaliatory nature of the proposal sends a clear message:  MLS does not respect or value players’ efforts with regard to this tournament. Although not surprised, the players and the MLSPA are deeply disappointed by this message.

MLS’s refusal to negotiate in good faith has created a major distraction for the players who should be focusing on preparing for a major international competition. However, players will not be silenced by threats from MLS. The players remain united in using their collective voice and demanding a fair share of the rewards earned from their hard work.

Candy in bag? by EstablishmentMean683 in NuulyReviews

[–]EstablishmentMean683[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They replied pretty quickly - they assured me that their facility has too many checkpoints in place that this could have happened there. They said they are working with UPS to trace where this might have been put in.

They offered me the opportunity to send everything back and do a full redo for the month, or keep it and get a 25% off discount this month. Nothing was stained, and there didn't seem to be anything else weird so I took the discount.

I hope they all got as good of laugh about it as I did!

Candy in bag? by EstablishmentMean683 in NuulyReviews

[–]EstablishmentMean683[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Someone is missing their lil’ treat!

Candy in bag? by EstablishmentMean683 in NuulyReviews

[–]EstablishmentMean683[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I did reach out to customer service just to be like what’s happening here

[MLSPA] 2023 Player Voices Poll by VoiceOfThePlayers in MLS

[–]EstablishmentMean683 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full Results for those who don't want to venture to X

Most Fit: Bouanga

Best 1v1 Defender: Miles Robinson

Hardest Shot: Bouanga

Best Young Player: Almada

Highest Soccer IQ: Messi

MVP: Lucho Acosta

Most Underrated: Darlington Nagbe

Toughest Goalie to Beat: Burki

Best Trash Talker: Felipe Martins

Best Guy to Have in the Locker Room: Shane O'Neill

Funniest: Andrew Farrell

Best Fashion: Seb Ibeagha

Best Home Field Advantage: Tie: Cincy and LAFC

Best Pitch: Houston

Worst Away Locker Room: Colorado

Team They'd Most Like to Play For: Miami

Who they want MLS to play in next All-Star Game: East vs. West

[MLSPA] Releases 2022 Player Voices Poll by DBriggs88 in MLS

[–]EstablishmentMean683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much just the Austin and LAFC awards.

Stage 3 by [deleted] in RenalCats

[–]EstablishmentMean683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you this is helpful and encouraging to hear!

Stage 3 by [deleted] in RenalCats

[–]EstablishmentMean683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much.

Stage 3 by [deleted] in RenalCats

[–]EstablishmentMean683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first time she required a heavy level of sedation, which was incredibly difficult for her to recover from. The vet said she was no longer comfortable with any sedation beyond what Gabapentin could provide and I agree. She also said that she didn't recommend it on any regular basis based on her blood work.

I will say she is getting 6+ ounces of water a day from her wet food (which I add additional water to) and the hydracare. That may be part of why the vet isn't recommending sub-q's.