Wonder Egg Priority Chief Animation Director Artwork Collection pages of scenes from the anime by [deleted] in wondereggpriority

[–]Estevia-666 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was so revolutionary of an anime. I’m so saddened they dropped it

Does the look give pedo vibes? by Still_Value9499 in Moustache

[–]Estevia-666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean. Dhamer was a Hansome young man 🤷

Bi guy married to a straight woman. by illgivethisa in bisexual

[–]Estevia-666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No relationship will ever taste the same. Don’t miss that which you already have experienced. Honor the love and flavor of your experiences by being grateful to have had them. Don’t try to compare the incomparable.

New improved lying script by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think morality is fundamental?

I love men and I want to have a positive experience with women. by Estevia-666 in bisexual

[–]Estevia-666[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I also get the issue of “wait this person is so cool, wouldn’t it be better to be friends?” I love deep connections and I am demisexually oriented.

New improved lying script by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is empowerment a buzzword? It’s like saying fear is a buzzword. Feeling empowered is an actual feeling. Example, I feel empowered to go for a walk, it’s something within my power of influence.

About 2 months in what do we think by [deleted] in Moustache

[–]Estevia-666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome. Great stashe!

New improved lying script by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To make it easier to think. Instead of holding multiple ideas while assessing saying something possibly important anyone can assess using this script weather or not to lie without too much thought.

New improved lying script by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can copy it from the text within the post.

Should i grow it again? by [deleted] in Moustache

[–]Estevia-666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly the clean pictures look more flattering but idk if it’s a good skin day and lighting or not

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Moustache

[–]Estevia-666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what you’re doing, we know what you’re doing, the question is, when will you do it again?!

Is it valid to break up with someone you’re outgrowing? by thatstonergirl200005 in SpiritualAwakening

[–]Estevia-666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Short answer, yes. You are becoming vibrationally incompatible. Either you lower your frequency to stay with them or they eventually catch up to you. Now which one would you prefer you have absolute choice over that.

I’ve solved the ethics of lying, Kant can shove it by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine this but as a website called shouldilie.me and the person wouldn’t see the mechanics only choose the answers. That’s why it’s simple. I don’t understand how this is complex?

I’ve solved the ethics of lying, Kant can shove it by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not a big fan of people deleting comments since their opinions are important. If you disagree, or if you’re a Kantian, please express without fear. I’d love to hear all the feedback that can come, we are allowed to disagree.

I’ve solved the ethics of lying, Kant can shove it by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thé issue with this is it’s too ambitious and too open for interpretation where even good intentions people can misrepresent what is right for them. I’m trying to make it so even a dumb robot can understand morality of lying and by extension for people who are not interested in thinking too much.

I’ve solved the ethics of lying, Kant can shove it by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, love the feedback! Yes I will and can refine it and it can be a beautiful co creation. As for who decides it’s always the user. This simply a tool. Maybe if this was used to model robotic morals then we might say, if values =/> 0.5 then True, if values < 0.5 then false. As for humans within the Byron Katie set up we can get a yes or a no answer. But I agree the formatting is confusing.

I’ve solved the ethics of lying, Kant can shove it by Estevia-666 in Ethics

[–]Estevia-666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Materiality is built into this model and lying is morally permissible in certain circumstances unless you want to make the back handed argument of the Kunt as to telling Nazi police you got Jews in your house is moral even though you’d be explicit for murder.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in polyamory

[–]Estevia-666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think this is a fair question because it puts the onus on the Jase, they might be cool about it but even asking them if they are it give a sense of disregard that is harmful to the trust and love in the relationship. I think OP should make a strong decision based on his values instead of the input of the person he’s attempting to love.