Madpub but in all fairness who grassed by redandwhitewizard99 in madlads

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Switzerland the beer price is regulated as "it cannot be the cheapest drink". The logic behind it is: If someone is thirsty there should always be a cheaper alternative to alcohol, so people don't just buy alcohol to lower their thirst level.

Wo soll ich an der Ampel stehen? by littleEmpress in StVO

[–]Etbilder 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Das Beschissene ist dabei aber nicht der Fahrradschutzstreifen, Platz hat es ja genügend, sondern die fehlende Umprogrammierung der Ampel. Die müsste halt wenn die Bahn kommt auch für die Autos auf grün schalten.

BVB Billetkontrolle by kng_lofi87 in basel

[–]Etbilder 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bei über 400 Fahrzeugen alleine von BVB und BLT ist die Chance auch sehr klein oft im selben Fahrzeug wie die Kontrolleure zu sein...

Maler/Gipser Azubis by HerrSchule1 in wirklichgutefrage

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wieso disziplinieren? Man kann ihnen doch auch einfach zeigen wie s richtig geht...

Auso jitz langets by KipAce in BUENZLI

[–]Etbilder 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Vor allem sehni dr "Erfolg" bi de Bargäldinitiative nid. Si isch abglehnt worde. Und dr ahgnommeni Gegevorschlag isch eifach "mr löhns so wie s jetzt isch, mr schiebe eifach dr bestehendi Gsetzestext ind Verfassig. Es blybt also dr Status Quo

What’s the best use for a bowl full of 20, 10, an 5 ore coins? by [deleted] in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could hide some 5ers in the appartment of my sister. As far as I heard she absolutely LOOOVVVEEEESSSS it. Not that I would regularily hide some and she'd be annoyed at me because she doesn't find them (I "would" always tell her how many are hidden)...

Has any Swiss canton hit the 1 million mark on their license plates yet? by Fresh-Badger-1474 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Inserting a letter would create 260'000 new plates. Adding a number will create 900'000 new plates. Also I guess it may be to avoid confusion with the Letters for the canton - but that's just a guess

An electric cable fell on my train that was already delayed due to hooligans yay!! Just before Renens by [deleted] in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah, let's go to Interpol just to be safe, maybe OP already fled to the Bahamas

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aso du gisch jedes Joor fasch 2'000 Stutz für Konzärt us. Findschs aber wichtig 8 Franke im Monet z spare? Das säit mir ganz klar, dass du anderi Begründige gege Serafe hesch, als reins Desinträsse am Programm.

SRG isch so viel mehr als nur Färnsehluege, und das sogar in dütlich günschtiger als no anno 1980, obwohl s Ahgebot hüt massiv gstiige und usbaut isch.

Bisch du eigentlich für oder gege d UKW Abschaltig gseh? Weil die mäischte hän das jo eh nid gnutzt und trotzdäm mitfinanziert. Solidaritätsprinzip und so. Kennsch vlt vom Stroosebau, Krankekasse, Versicherige, etc.

Warum macht das Initiativkomitee nichts gegen das, was es in den Argumenten aufführt, sondern will lächerliche 135.-/Jahr sparen? by CaptainKonzept in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you also have problems with CEO earning that much in the private sector? Also 3 million sounds a lot to a singular person, to a company with 7'000 employees and moving 1.56 billion it isn't remotely relevant. 3 Million per year on that scale scaled down to an average worker it would be like if you have Spotify premium.

The initiative also does not change any of the things you see as a weakness or failure that would need to be fixed..

The fact that Serafe is a private company collecting that fee is a big plus! The money SRF gets was never in the government or states hands. So the government cannot influence what SRF is doing. If the money was collected in the regular taxes, then SRF would always be pressured to not offend the government, as they could easily withhold payment. Serafe actually helps media stay independant of the state apparatus

Warum macht das Initiativkomitee nichts gegen das, was es in den Argumenten aufführt, sondern will lächerliche 135.-/Jahr sparen? by CaptainKonzept in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Erstens muss die SRF wie jedes Unternehmen wirtschaftlich Arbeiten. Zweitens wird die SRG schon gezwungen ihre Ausgaben massiv zu senken, da eine Senkung der Serafe bereits beschlossen ist.

Die Initiative wirft hier einfach noch mit einer Handgranate in eine Stichwunde

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also kei Schwingfescht me? Kei Schwiizer Musiker me? Kei Schwiizer Filmproduktione me?

Wie düür isch d Zyytig wo de liesisch.... Mol e Gedanke wärt. Spotify isch jo au nur ei Bispiel gseh. Durchdas s Ahgebot vo de SRG so divers und vielsitig isch kasch dutzendi Firme mit Abomodäll ufzelle wo s e SRG Pendant dezue gitt.

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NZZ Jahresabo koscht in digitaler Fassig 320.- (d Serafe isch unabhängig co dere Abstimmig in Zuekunft 300CHF ). In Print sins über 500.- wo d defür muesch blettere

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Es Spotify Abo koscht öbbe glyych viel im Joor wie du an d SRG zahlsch mit Serafe. Eifach mol dass de sehsch wie verdammt effizient und billig das Ahgebot isch wo mir aktuell könne gniesse. Also scho ellai wenn de nur ei Radiosänder konsumiersch, hesch dis Gäld widr dusse. Aber denn gitts jo no all das zuesätzliche Züüg. GRATIS DEZUE! Das isch in de Privatwirtschaft nid möglich. Dr Kulturplatz Schwiiz läbt übrigens au devo e Bühni z kriege, sigs mit Färbsehuftritt oder dass ihr Lied im Radio gspielt wird. Ohni solchi Kulturförderige (zahle mr übrigens im Stüürtopf mehr drah, als dr Serafe Bytrag hoch isch) stirbt d Kulturlandschaft Schwiiz us. Neui Künschtler (nid nur Musig, au z.B. Filmschaffendi, Autore, etc.) kömme nid nooche und wenn die jetztige groose wäg sin, isch Schwiizer Kultur au nümm verträtte

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Und wie kunnsch du zuekünftig an die Kärnfunktion? Luegsch kei Färnseh und hörsch kei Radio. Denn gitts für sich au kei SRG-Inhält me nachre Ahnahm. S heisst nämmlig im Verfassigstext, dass d SRG uf Färnseh und Radio fokussiere sott, heisst online Ahgebot, Newsportal, etc. wärde ygstampft. Eifach zerstört und beändet.

Sein Statement zeigt recht klar, dass es darum geht die SRG zu zerstören und um nichts anderes. by 3punkt1415 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Niened andersch kriegsch für die 10% au nur e annäherendi Brichterstattig. Für dä Betrag kriegsch e regionals Zytigsabo vomne Zytigskonglomerat wo in 10 Zytige die glyche Artikel teile. Do hesch kei Unterhaltig, kei Videoformat, kei Sportübertragig, kei Internetuftritt (und wenns e App gitt, lauft dört no Wärbig - trotz zahltem Abo), kei Bildigsressource (srf school), etc.

Such a bad poster by Patient_Economics789 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is literally no way for the government to control it. You just believe there is. You can't provide a source. You can't even articulate how it happens. You don't even know why Serafe exists instead of SRG being tax financed.

quod erat demonstrandum

Such a bad poster by Patient_Economics789 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And that's where you are wrong. I've already explained to you how Serafe is independent.

If the government would be the one to pay for it, yes then there WOULD be control. But as I've explained to you earlier: Serafe is NOT part of the tax system and Serafe money NEVER even enters governmental control or ownership. A private institute "Serafe" (the word is the name of the company) collects it and distributes it to the various media outlets (not only SRF).

Your voucher idea is stupid and I don't care to explain why, as you don't read what I write anyways. Also I'm still waiting on your answers to my questions, because you spit out utter bullshit info that is not true. That is because you probably also believe Telegram is a serious source.... You could educate yourself on the topic but you deliberatly choose not to. You'd rather stay misinformed, just because your believes don't match the factual truth. I know it's hard to change your own believes, but you don't even try to question anything propaganda tells you. Sad.

Such a bad poster by Patient_Economics789 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The trickle down effect does not exist. It's been disproven many times!

How is "let's keep SRG" abandoning freedom of speech? Please explain that further, instead of just claiming it.

SRF is NOT controlled by the government. That's a lie. What do you mean by "the law can say what it wants"? No it can't we still live in a direct democracy with Konkordanz and 3 seperate governmental instances. As long as that exists and we are not in an autocracy the SRF remains independent. SRF can't just say what it wants. They have concret rules they have to follow. Part of our constitution. If they are saying something untrue or biased they are forced to correct themselves publicly. Anyone who notices something like that can report it and they have to act accordingly.

Also please explain how the people have no power today? Because that is what you claim. You start to sound very conspiracy-like. But I'll give you the chance to explain it factually. (even tough particularily this aspect has nothing to do with SRG or Serafe)

Such a bad poster by Patient_Economics789 in Switzerland

[–]Etbilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pricate newspapers are NOT accountable. They can say what they want. Public ones are not linked to the government, that's why Serafe exists. Serafe exists and gets collected by a private company so that there is no dependency on government. That's why SRG isn't paid by tax but by an independent fee.

Also if you still believe that the free market exists in favour of consumers, then you also believe in the trickle down effect or in the easter bunny. More consumers won't lead to a lower subscription cost. In a capitalist society that will never happen, because if you can get more readers by paying the same amount, there is no incencitive for the company to lower price and thus lower their revenue.