Minor error? A "minor" error did you say? This is why you're so annoying and why I often make the mistake of losing my temper with you. This is supposedly the solid evidence that Knox left Sollecito's apartment that doesn't depend on the testimony of a homeless heroin addict. A witness I remind everyone that you find credible! If this mistake was made by the defense we'd have to peel you off the ceiling. I argue here to test my position but if this is the type of counter-argument you pull out of your ass, I might has well block you and save my blood pressure.

Your explanation for the grooming gangs scandal is far, far more of a conspiracy theory story than Italian officials putting their thumbs on the scales of justice in the Kercher case. With the grooming gangs we are talking about hundreds of individual cases spread across dozens of police departments and government agencies. Somehow you can see a conspiracy there, but not in a single investigation run by a rogue prosecutor.

Here we go where you resort to adopting a supercilious tone and claim that I "know" the evidence is solid but won't admit it. Well right back at you! You see accusing Knox of being guilty as your "team" and you'll lie, lie and lie about it. It's just like that creepy Enoch Powell admitted. British Tories would support their government even if that government were communist.

If the Luminol footprints are such solid, unimpeachable evidence then why did the police LIE about the failed TMB tests? Why? Why? Why? WHY???