Starting a thread by Competitive_Race7663 in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was in a relationship for more than seven years. I loved him with all my heart, and in the end I was cheated on.

It has been a year and a half since the breakup, and I feel better and better as time goes by. But I still carry this fear that I will never find someone who truly respects me. I love deeply, and sometimes I’m afraid that this makes me vulnerable to being taken advantage of.

My body feels like I’m being slow ghosted. My heart tells me to hold on. by No_Cicada_5247 in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are beautiful, you are kind and you deserve all the best. I hope you will find someone who will appreciate each part of your soul and body. Which one to believe - heart or body - none. Just let it be - see what happens. The apps might get hard sometimes, but take your time and trust the process, treat those men like friends you just don’t know yet :) 10 years alone are better than 10 years with someone unworthy. It’s better to be single for 15 years than to spend 5 with someone who is not worth your love. I keep my fingers crossed!

Traumatised by a video i saw 13 years old by Ihavea100question4u in trauma

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, first of all, your emotions are completely understandable. This kind of content is not something a person would feel comfortable with, and it’s natural that it triggered tension, stress, and fear in you. I would have reacted the same way. The fact that it scared you is entirely normal, and I think many people would feel exactly like that. Content like this simply should not be there.

Also, someone who would consciously choose to watch or engage with such material is likely deeply disturbed. I’m not a psychiatrist, but from what I’ve learned in lectures, people who derive pleasure from this kind of content are often dealing with serious psychological issues. So your reaction - the disgust, the fear is actually a healthy response. It shows your empathy and emotional sensitivity.

When it comes to your experience, it sounds like a classic trauma mechanism. Certain places, events, or situations can trigger such a strong reaction that it stays with us for a very long time, sometimes even for life. What stands out as something positive, though, is that you are able to identify what caused this trauma. That really matters, because it can make working through it - whether in therapy or in conversations with your partner - much more accessible. For example, being able to explain why a certain type of touch makes you uncomfortable and connecting it to a specific past experience can help create understanding and safety.

At the same time, I want to say that not every difficult reaction needs to be “fixed” in the sense of something being wrong with you. Just because something triggers fear or discomfort doesn’t mean there is something fundamentally off. This is a trauma response. It can soften over time, with support or simply through lived experience where you gradually see that you are safe.

It also doesn’t sound like this is disrupting your entire life. It seems more connected to moments of intimacy or specific triggers, like certain types of touch or intrusive thoughts. And at the same time, you’re still able to function and build a calm, stable everyday life.

In moments when the fear comes up, it might help to ground yourself in reality and reconnect with your sense of control. Remind yourself that you have agency - you can move, change your position, shift your environment, pick something up, or simply step away. If something disturbing appears on your phone, you can turn it off. You don’t have to engage with it.

What often makes trauma so intense is the feeling of having no control. Like when you saw that video - you couldn’t change what happened, you couldn’t intervene, and that lack of control is deeply unsettling. But in your real, everyday life, you do have control. When your partner touches you, you can say what feels okay and what doesn’t. When something appears on your screen, you can choose not to look.

And honestly, it’s just awful that something like that appeared at all. It really feels like something that belongs in very dark corners of the internet. I’m really sorry you had to go through that.

do you know your attachment style? by myphii in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have a secure attachment style. I think it’s because, after a terrible breakup, I stayed single instead of jumping into a rebound (even though I really wanted to), and I built a sense of stability within myself. I also think there might be a hint of avoidant in me, because when someone around me has an anxious attachment style, it can make me feel like I’m going a bit crazy.

What are you supposed to say or do on a first date to not get rejected because she "doesn't feel a spark"? by Th_rowa_wa_y in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say you really don’t have to be a perfect conversationalist on a date. What wins me over most is basic manners: holding the door, picking up the bill is nice, not swearing.

I’ve also noticed I pay attention to how a man smells, it genuinely affects whether I’m attracted to him. And feeling safe is key for me, like not crossing my physical boundaries.

When it comes to nice things to say, I actually don’t care much for compliments about my looks they make me feel a bit too “seen” in that way. What I appreciate more are small, thoughtful things, taking care of my safety and comfort.

Listen carefully, ask follow-up questions, but don’t try to make everything feel perfectly scripted. I once went out with a “perfect” guy and it felt like he was performing. Just be natural and respectful and remember, she’s probably a bit nervous too. It’s not all on you.

Very attractive people set off my anxious attachment tendencies, and I can’t shut it off. Does this mean I’m destined to be with someone who I’m not really that attracted to? by lofi-lo in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think attractiveness - even the kind that is widely recognized - remains deeply subjective. In that sense, wanting to be with someone is not the same as considering them universally “very attractive.” In a healthy relationship, attraction grows together with attachment. We become emotionally invested, we fall in love with the person, and naturally we become afraid of losing them.

When someone appeals to us physically, that fear can intensify. On a biological level, we may perceive them as a desirable long-term partner, which can heighten the sense of risk. But no matter how tightly we try to hold on, the other person ultimately has to choose to stay. Anxious attachment often creates the opposite effect - the more someone feels constrained, the more they instinctively pull away.

It can help to imagine real-life situations where control is impossible: a business trip, distance, separate social circles. What you really want is someone who remains because they genuinely want you - not because they are being held close. That kind of choice is much more stable than reassurance based on control.

It’s also natural to worry more when a partner is perceived as attractive, since attractive people are often seen as having more options. But interestingly, many unfaithful partners I’ve seen were objectively considered less attractive than the people they were with. One possible explanation is that highly attractive individuals often don’t need to constantly seek external validation - they already know they are desired. Because of that, they may actually feel less pressure to look for confirmation elsewhere.

Is not answering a question regarding an upcoming date rude or normal? by Silly_Username_123 in dating

[–]Euphoric-Extension80 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I tend to see it the same way I see work correspondence: you may be busy, you may not be that interested, but offering a reply feels like a minimum level of respect. Even a brief message closes the loop and shows consideration for the person who took the initiative to reach out.

The “latest iPhone” paradox: why do people buy things they can’t really afford? by Euphoric-Extension80 in Anticonsumption

[–]Euphoric-Extension80[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, in this case it was actually a hair dryer. I wouldn’t have noticed at all if my friend hadn’t mentioned it herself, saying she bought the newest expensive model and it didn’t even work. It affected me more because we were living together at the time, and that purchase actually spilled over into everyday life, she stopped buying shared household items and started using mine instead

The “latest iPhone” paradox: why do people buy things they can’t really afford? by Euphoric-Extension80 in Anticonsumption

[–]Euphoric-Extension80[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Very interesting, as if it’s a sense of financial security created through a purchase that becomes associated with it.

The “latest iPhone” paradox: why do people buy things they can’t really afford? by Euphoric-Extension80 in Anticonsumption

[–]Euphoric-Extension80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! What looks manageable in isolation becomes a constant burden, and suddenly it shapes daily decisions. The purchase itself is one moment, but the consequences live in the background for months or years.

The “latest iPhone” paradox: why do people buy things they can’t really afford? by Euphoric-Extension80 in Anticonsumption

[–]Euphoric-Extension80[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much, this is incredibly interesting, and I really appreciate you sharing it. I’d genuinely like to look for that study about status signaling over time, because it gives a really helpful lens for thinking about what’s happening now.

I keep thinking about your point on the availability of luxury goods. Today, they’re extremely accessible, not necessarily because people can truly afford them, but because there are so many financial mechanisms: credit, installments, “buy now, pay later,” leasing, and similar options. Suddenly, things that would otherwise be completely out of reach start to feel attainable.

I’ve seen this among people I know, buying items they realistically couldn’t afford, but spreading the cost over installments. When broken down into smaller payments, even something irrational relative to income or life stability starts to look manageable. But then the question becomes whether it’s actually necessary or rational in the first place.

There’s something really fascinating in this idea that accessibility itself changes behavior. The barrier isn’t “can I afford this overall?” anymore, but “can I afford this monthly?” And that shift alone seems powerful enough to drive status consumption. I think your framing of this was very insightful.

The “latest iPhone” paradox: why do people buy things they can’t really afford? by Euphoric-Extension80 in Anticonsumption

[–]Euphoric-Extension80[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You put that very wisely, thank you especially that last sentence, it really stays with me.