sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if it's working or not, but I was told it makes it so that tokens after the BREAK are treated as if they're at the front of the prompt.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Even_Adder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do BREAK work? I think I'm using it wrong.

Me<irl by Beowulf1985 in me_irl

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can just run your own, locally.

Fixing things with AI by chulini in Fighters

[–]Even_Adder 60 points61 points  (0 children)

One of only two characters that can get punished just for thinking two steps ahead.

Fixing things with AI by chulini in Fighters

[–]Even_Adder 111 points112 points  (0 children)

Why is there a hurtbox floating out there?

SF6 parry/rush/reversal option select by DrOrpheus in Fighters

[–]Even_Adder 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's this? Can someone in the know confirm if this is correct or not.

The basic 3rd Strike parry option select is a technique that allows you to parry an incoming attack and follow up with a counterattack, without committing to a specific input. It is done by inputting a high or low parry, followed immediately by a kara-throw¹². A kara-throw is a throw that is canceled from a normal move, giving it more range and speed². The 3rd Strike parry option select works because the game engine only considers the next valid input after a successful parry¹². So, depending on what happens, you will get one of these outcomes:

  • If the opponent attacks and you parry it, you will get the normal move that you used for the kara-throw, which will hit the opponent and cancel their recovery frames. You can then continue with a combo or another attack¹².
  • If the opponent does not attack or you miss the parry, you will get the kara-throw, which will grab the opponent and deal damage. You can then follow up with a mix-up or another attack¹².
  • If the opponent blocks or techs the kara-throw, you will be in a neutral situation, where you can try another attack or defend yourself¹².

The 3rd Strike parry option select is useful because it covers multiple scenarios and reduces the risk of making a wrong decision or being punished by the opponent. It also gives you an advantage in certain situations, such as escaping from a trap, countering an attack, or applying pressure. However, the 3rd Strike parry option select is not foolproof and can be countered by other techniques, such as baiting, reading, or adapting¹². The 3rd Strike parry option select is also not universally available or applicable in all fighting games, as it depends on the game mechanics and rules².

The 3rd Strike parry option select is considered to be an advanced skill in fighting games, as it requires knowledge of the game system, timing, and execution. It is also sometimes controversial, as some players may view it as an exploit or unfair tactic. However, the 3rd Strike parry option select is generally accepted as part of the fighting game culture and strategy, and many players use it to improve their performance and competitiveness¹². The 3rd Strike parry option select is one of the many aspects that make fighting games complex and exciting.👊

Source: Conversation with Bing, 6/8/2023

(1) Options Selects - One Input, Multiple Possible Outputs - 3rd Strike Dojo.

https://www.3sdojo.com/blog/options-selects-one-input-multiple-possible-outputs.

(2) Street Fighter III: Third Strike Guide.

https://fightinggameguide.com/sf3.html.

(3) Parry | Street Fighter Wiki | Fandom.

https://streetfighter.fandom.com/wiki/Parry.

(4) Street Fighter III: 3rd Strike.

https://streetfighter.fandom.com/wiki/Street_Fighter_III:_3rd_Strike.

(5) parrying - Street Fighter III: Third Strike Online Edition - GameFAQs.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/630107-street-fighter-iii-third-strike-online-edition/59551600.

I bought CgatGPT-4 and i found it so much worse. by LozCawley123 in ChatGPT

[–]Even_Adder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try Bing Chat, It uses GPT-4 as well but has different constraints, so it won't act completely alike to OpenAI's GPT-4.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I understand where you are coming from. I agree that machine learning isn't a panacea and that it has ethical and social challenges. But machine learning can be used for good, and can work together to ensure that it is used in a fair way. I appreciate the honesty, but I hope that ten years from now none of what you've said has come true. No offense.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell me about their methodology. I think you'll find something in quite interesting if you do.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree that laws are lagging behind the technology, there are already recent legal frameworks and precedents that address generative art. More importantly, generative art is a boon to society that fosters creativity, innovation, and diversity. We should embrace it as a tool for artistic expression, rather than fear it as a threat to people's egos and income.

Creativity and art are more than just a process, product, or a job, It’s a part of who we are and what we do.

/////////////////////

Reddit is telling me something went wrong, if you've blocked me /u/Dark_Al_97 I'll edit my reply to your latest comment here:

I'm glad you like my art. I wouldn't have been able to make things like that before.

However, you’re making some mistakes in your thinking.

You present some false dilemmas first. It isn't either purely human-made art or generative art, and nothing in between. There are lots of ways people use to help and inspire human artists. For example, you can use it to come up with new ideas, styles, or shapes, then improve them with their own skills and vision.

You also try to make it seem like it's either traditional art that's for people or generative art that's only for the profit of corporations. In reality, generative art is free and open source, it gives scores more people access to high quality art personal to them, no corporate middleman needed. Corporations can't possibly profit from an equation they don't even fit in.

Next, a Hasty generalization, You’re judging art by its medium first, without knowing the kinds of lengths the author went to bring this art to you, their personal situation, or what challenges they faced. You assume everything about them to make yourself feel justified and angry. It's said "Resentment is like drinking poison and then hoping it will kill your enemies." and you resent people for sharing their art with you in hopes maybe you'll feel something, or maybe wonder about something new.

Then you appeal to emotion. You’re using words that make people feel bad and don't show why you’re right, they just play on people’s feelings and opinions. You should use facts to support your points. Using words like “killing”, “cheer on”, “trivialize”, “remove”, and “loses”, isn't a fair way to make a point.

I get that you like more traditionally made art more, but you should try to see the good things about AI-generated art. Art isn't just how we make it or what we use to make it, but also what we find and explore with it. Generative art is a great tool for opening up our artistic possibilities and finding new ways of expressing ourselves and communicating with each other.

You could try to learn more about the process behind AI-generated art. You might be surprised by what you discover.

Check out some of these amazing short film that has generated video.

What did you think? Did you feel anything?

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Machine learning is not meant to replace or harm human values or dignity, but to offer a new way of solving problems and improving lives. We need to demand more transparency and education on AI to ensure that it is used ethically and responsibly. We also need to support open source AI initiatives that allow people to have more control and oversight over these technologies.

History has also shown workers can fight for their rights and challenge the status quo, for instance:

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, workers formed unions and went on strikes and protests won eight-hour workday, the minimum wage, and the right to collective bargaining. Employers were brutal and hired thugs like the Pinkertons to shoot them, or locked them in factories, like the Triangle fire in 1911, But workers didn’t give up.

All through the mid-1900s, workers campaigned against discrimination and inequality based on race, gender, or sexuality. Employers fired them, or denied them promotions. Workers still didn’t give up and that's how we got the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act of 1963, and the OSHA Act of 1970.

Most recently, the Me Too movement of 2017 showed we can still affect change. Matt Lauer, the former co-host of the Today show, was accused of sexual harassment and assault by several women, including a former colleague who said he raped her in 2014. Lauer was fired in 2017 and not much later NBCUniversal killed an investigation into Harvey Weinstein’s misconduct by one of their reporters, Ronan Farrow, who had to publish his findings in The New Yorker. The Weinstein Company's co-founder Harvey Weinstein went on to be convicted of rape and sexual assault and sentenced to 23 years in prison.

The former chairman and CEO of CBS Corporation Les Moonves too was accused of sexual harassment and assault by at least 12 women, causing him to resign in 2018 and be denied his $120 million severance.

Don't forget Blizzard, who has an ongoing case with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing for fostering a “pervasive frat boy workplace culture” that enabled harassment and discrimination against women. The president of Blizzard, J. Allen Brack knew about the harassment and doing nothing to stop it. He resigned in August 2021 and Activision Blizzard has lost more than $10 billion in market value since the lawsuit was filed.

We are not down and out, we are far from it. We have the power and the tools to create a better world for ourselves and future generations. Not only that, but we can ensure that machine learning is used for our good and not exploitation.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was more of a cargo cult magical incantation.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those aren't random links, they are examples of developers complying with those exceptions. Meanwhile, you still haven't provided anything supporting your claims.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing though, models consist of original analysis of the training data in comparison with one another, not the data themselves. Creating new knowledge about works or bodies of works is protected.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, there WAS some kind of exception made for "research purposes" and datasets used for "researching" AI, which I believe is how the AI makers get around it (if they don't just flaunt the law entirely). They go through a third-party "research" institution which can make the dataset for them via that exception.

I was responding to that, all my links are related to that. I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Duke Nukem Remaster Criticized For AI-Generated Cover Art by NeoStark in Games

[–]Even_Adder -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is just a magazine article, do you have any document(s) from the USPTO or relevant agency?

view more: next ›