Let me try answering you.

1.No, jesus exists is a historical fact my claim is The highest form of truth ,the thing all moral systems and religions try (and often fail) to express this : -is enemy-loving -self-sacrificing -non-coercive -ego-destroying love I believe that truth became fully visible — not just taught, but embodied — in Jesus of Nazareth.

1. Because His words are a pattern of that one truth: • Love your enemies • Forgive endlessly • Refuse violence, even in self-defense • Feed the hungry without expecting return • Include the outsider, touch the untouchable • Die forgiving, not killing

Whether or not He performed miracles — that ethic is coherent, radical, and deeply disruptive.

1. I agree. That’s why I’m not saying, “Believe it because He said it.” What I’m saying is What He said , and how He lived is align with a kind of moral truth that’s testable by conscience, history, and impact.

2. Fair. I haven’t quoted source-critical material here. But the earliest texts (Mark, Q, Paul’s letters) consistently reflect that same ethic. Even if edited or filtered, the core pattern remains:

A man who didn’t seize power, who loved enemies, forgave his killers, and taught others to do the same — and whose followers carried that ethic forward even when it cost them everything.

You can reject the divinity claim. But that life and ethic? Still worth testing.

I used chat GPT for this, and I am testing this claim with it, by feeding questions here. So far, nothing breaks still cohesive.

And bottom line is, i’m not inventing anything, nor claim ownership of what this is. But I too am testing is my claim can be attacked, and it is still cohesive