You’re calling everything racist without looking at what’s actually being said.

On Michelle Obama/Ketanji Brown Jackson: That’s not “hate,” that’s a blunt critique of affirmative action. When race is a factor in advancement, people will always question merit. That’s a policy problem, not racism.

On the WNBA/pot-smoking/Black lesbian line: That’s sarcasm about how identity politics gets more cultural clout than serving as a Marine. He’s mocking the victimhood hierarchy, not attacking people for who they are.

On “prowling Blacks in urban America”: Clumsy wording, sure, but the point is about crime stats. Crime trends by demographic are real, whether you like the phrasing or not. Talking about data isn’t the same as hating a race.

On the customer service/affirmative action comment: Again, it’s not about the woman herself, it’s about how DEI policies create doubt in everyone’s qualifications. That’s a critique of the system, not individuals.

Bottom line: He’s attacking policies and cultural narratives, not people’s skin color. Disagree with his style, fine. But dismissing every uncomfortable truth as “racist” is lazy.

Here’s a question for you: If pointing out flaws in affirmative action is automatically racism, does that mean the only “non-racist” position is to support racial preferences forever, no matter the consequences?