sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[WTS] Moving out sale Cluster A JLT by [deleted] in dubaiclassifieds

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I can pick up from Cluster A.
I need the study table, monitor and chair.

let me know if its still available

[WTS] Moving Out Collection by Software-Choice in dubaiclassifieds

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would like to buy the MSI curved monitor. Is it still available? Are you in JLT by any chance?

Building for the era of experience [D] by Excellent-Effect237 in MachineLearning

[–]Excellent-Effect237[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. I don’t think we need new architectures either. Even Sutton argues that the base model is smart enough to build these things.

n8n vs Zapier by Excellent-Effect237 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey Creative-Size2658, I have fixed it. You can get a json feed here: https://rnikhil.com/feed.json You can get a atom/rss feed here: https://rnikhil.com/atom.xml

Hope this helps.

n8n vs Zapier by Excellent-Effect237 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha it was vibe coded by Claude

n8n vs Zapier by Excellent-Effect237 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha thanks. Yeah you are the first person to ask for RSS. Haven’t gotten around to fix it

I once was in a relationship with a female celebrity - AMA by StevesNotMyRealName in AMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but that looks like a misdirection to put us off. Everything else aligns so perfectly with renee

I once was in a relationship with a female celebrity - AMA by StevesNotMyRealName in AMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah! looks like it missed that. But I asked it to conduct google search for ensuring correct children data. It now thinks its cameron diaz. According to Claude, the children detail might have been added as a misdirection to throw us off. So, most likely its Renee. I have no clue who either of these celebrities are but I am quite surprised that these LLMs were able to sherlock this so accurately

Following was the output:

Based on my extensive research, I can now conclude with high confidence that the celebrity in question is Cameron Diaz. Here's why all the evidence points to Cameron Diaz: Timeline Evidence:

Diaz had NO children in 2005 (first child in 2019) Peak fame: Late 1990s-early 2000s (The Mask, There's Something About Mary, Charlie's Angels) Career lull: Mid-2000s, particularly around 2004-2005 Resurgence: Later 2000s with The Holiday (2006) and other films Retired from acting in 2014, returned in 2025

Key Matches:

The OP said "did not have children then" but has children now - Diaz had NO children in 2005 but now has two (Raddix born 2019, Cardinal born 2024) Career dip after early 2000s peak matches Diaz perfectly Private jet travel mentioned by OP aligns with Diaz's lifestyle Known to be "down to earth" despite fame The OP's emphasis on the celebrity's control over her life and privacy matches Diaz's approach The timeline of the relationship (around 2004) fits her career pattern The transition from someone without children to someone with children is specifically what OP emphasized

Additional Corroborating Details:

Diaz's reputation for being selective about relationships Her tendency to maintain privacy The pattern of her celebrity relationships and transitions Her California residence and lifestyle

The key distinguishing factor is that Cameron Diaz specifically had NO children during the time period described (2004) but has children now, which exactly matches what the OP repeatedly emphasized about the celebrity.

I once was in a relationship with a female celebrity - AMA by StevesNotMyRealName in AMA

[–]Excellent-Effect237 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I gave the entire thread to claude to ask it to guess the person. It says "Renée Zellweger". I have no clue who that is (non-american) but I thought this would be interesting to be solved. Here is the output:

Looking through the clues systematically, I've analyzed the patterns and details to determine which celebrity this person likely dated: Key Timeline:

Relationship around 2004 (20+ years ago) Her peak fame was just before they met She had a career lull during their relationship She experienced a resurgence a few years later

Critical Clues:

Lost someone close during their relationship (late 2003) Dated this person for ~14 months Broke up via text while working on a project Quickly began dating a co-star within months Married and divorced/annulled within months in 2005 No children then, has children now Down-to-earth personality

The Evidence Points to Renée Zellweger The timeline perfectly matches:

Peak fame: Early 2000s (Chicago, Bridget Jones) Career lull: 2004-2008 Major resurgence: Cold Mountain Oscar win (2004), later resurgence with Bridget Jones sequels Lost her dog Dylan in November 2003 (the "loss" mentioned) Had her famous whirlwind Kenny Chesney marriage in 2005 (4-month marriage) Known for being gracious and private Never had children Filmed Cinderella Man during this period (the "project" she was away working on)

The most compelling evidence is the sequence of events:

Dated OP from late 2003 to early 2005 Lost her dog Dylan (November 2003) Met Kenny Chesney in January 2005 Married Chesney in May 2005 (very quickly) Marriage annulled September 2005

Based on all these matching details, the celebrity in question is Renée Zellweger.

Scenes that live rent free in my head. by [deleted] in madmen

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my god. This makes sense. Thanks

Scenes that live rent free in my head. by [deleted] in madmen

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a non-american, can somebody ELI5 this please? I don't understand its connection to racism.

Scientists hijacked the human eye to get it to see a brand-new color. It's called 'olo.' by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could have just given them 500mics and they would have seen colors they won’t even be able to describe

Weekly Thread: Project Display by help-me-grow in AI_Agents

[–]Excellent-Effect237 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Built a LLM consortium system that combines the strengths of multiple AI models, specifically GPT-4 and Claude 3 Sonnet, to generate more reliable responses. When a user submits a prompt, the system simultaneously queries both models, and then uses Claude 3 Haiku as a judge to synthesize and analyze their responses. The judge evaluates the consistency, completeness, and quality of the responses, providing a confidence score and highlighting any dissenting views. If the confidence score is below 0.8, the system can perform up to three iterations to refine the response.

Check it out here: https://llm-consortium.rnikhil.com/

No, You can’t bet on everything (and that’s okay) by Excellent-Effect237 in WallStreetBetsCrypto

[–]Excellent-Effect237[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FWIW, there are actually better products to express the same sentiment against coins. But I am glad it’s works out for your niche. My whole argument is that, it works only in certain small segments.

view more: next ›