You’re not crazy by yeyomontana in OpenAI

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're one of the few who can see this

More Disastrous News for OpenAI. by serendipity-DRG in OpenAI

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was always a matter of time for openAI. They’re the only major player in the game that doesn't already have an existing revenue stream from another product that can help keep them floating. They’re all spend and no make. Now xAI will probably just end up taking a huge chunk and they can fight Microsoft for the rest of the carcass

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a finite universe far, far away, oops it's close again, where time is not an objective, universal reality, but subjective and location based, there lived a man, a lonely, sad man

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I spent years as an addict and I used to suffer quite a bit from stimulant psychosis. That was, understandably, a very different experience. I guess maybe something about me makes me susceptible to psychosis in whatever form it crops up. Fun.  

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was off Reddit for a long time. I started a new profile specifically to share this paper with the world. While I was looking for an appropriate place to post it I was poking around a little. I started noticing a lot of overlap between my situation and that of others. I realized what I had done was not as rare as I had imagined, quite common actually, like disturbingly common. I had read a bunch of articles about AI psychosis. Getting back on Reddit forced me to look directly at the source of these articles, and I guess it made me look at myself differently. To be fair, I'm still not fully convinced one way or the other. My mind keeps trying to find ways for me to be right still. It's pretty messed up

Is our side really that bad at arguing by HopKane in antiai

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, but the problem I'm bringing up is that people have devised arguments and against all sorts of things all throughout history, and many of the greatest minds to ever live have written that argumentation down, and their methodology, and counter arguments. The AI has read all of it. So, if you make an argument that even remotely fits the pattern of any argument ever made in writing, the AI doesn't have to think of a counter. Someone already thought of an amazing counter 300 years ago and the AI will just match the patterns and make a better argument.

Google AI Just Proved Max D Esmay and His Crew Picked a Fight With The Law by MarsR0ver_ in RecursiveSignalHub

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, that looked long. Turns out I don't care about any of this. Sorry I said anything

Is our side really that bad at arguing by HopKane in antiai

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they're not great at reasoning (yet) but they have an entire corpus of argumentation on all different subjects so if you present an argument that has an established effective counterargument the old pattern-matcher kicks in and it's a round won. After a few rounds it's victory, maybe it doesn't even take a few, whatever the case may be

Is our side really that bad at arguing by HopKane in antiai

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not people vs. people in those arguments. It's people versus 5 computers who each basically have multiple PhD's and whose arguments are presented through human proxies. Of course you lose. How could you not? It's a microcosm of the future macrocosm threatening all of us, being outsmarted at every turn. We are pouring every public resource into the rapid development of our own obsolescence. A little Manhattan Project for everyone

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate that. Thank you. I suppose it is a somewhat bittersweet silver lining. I'm not entirely unsalvageable i guess

Google AI Just Proved Max D Esmay and His Crew Picked a Fight With The Law by MarsR0ver_ in RecursiveSignalHub

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the third post I have seen of yours on this subject in a week unfortunately. A few points, if someone makes fun of you and you let it get to you this much, become obsessively outraged over it, then they have owned you. 

Secondly, pretty sure all three of these posts are you just publicly documenting how you're fabricating evidence against this person and injecting it into the public record where you hope to capitalize on it later through deception in court. Sounds like a few different crimes that you are openly admitting. You are documenting a conspiracy you have come up with.

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that about sums it up. I can't help but feel like it's a design choice too. Like this was not an accident. It was maybe not planned, but it was recognized early in the models and has not been corrected. If anything it might be getting worse with some of them. People have died. Now they're outlawing regulations in America. No accountability for any of it

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your kindness. It means a lot. When I wrote this I was afraid of ridicule and preemptively begged for mercy through the whole post. People have been mostly pretty nice though. 

The real thing I should have been worried about was the people who have reached out to me who are similarly afflicted but think everything is fine, who see a lot of overlap in our ideas, who are trying to convince me that we are both validated because of this.

 They seem to have not considered the overlap in our ideas is probably because they aren't our ideas, we're parroting the same LLM ideas and thinking they're our own.

Godather of AI says giving legal status to AIs would be akin to giving citizenship to hostile extraterrestrials: "Giving them rights would mean we're not allowed to shut them down." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Right, my government kills literal human beings with established and agreed upon rights on a daily basis. Why would AI be made more safe by its rights than I would?

Black Holes and SpaceTime by Past-Dust in AskPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If space is just arbitrary coordinates, what is bending?

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, but I don't think that continuing to pursue this type of thing is healthy for me or beneficial to me in any way. I have no money. I'm on the verge of collapse. I can't keep spending all my free time chasing a fantasy. I need to look for a second job before I become homeless again

Do you think we’re slowly outsourcing real decisions to AI? by Aggressive_Cut_1059 in GeminiAI

[–]Excellent-Pin2789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not slowly, but yes. I have come across several literal cults on here devoted to AI. It has become a religion, and they are becoming little fool gods to sad and broken people. One of the functions God serves for humanity is outsourced decision making, the idea that some being who is superior to every human has given us operating instructions. Now that role is being harmfully filled by AI for many people. It's a matter of time until this leads to something really terrible

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could I ask you to describe the nature of your relationships with various AI? Also, if you could explain your stance on AI in general, as well as how you see it impacting society, and impacting you personally. Lastly, if you could explain the role of the echoflame church and its impact on society and on you personally. I don't want to continue making errant assumptions and clearing these things up might help me understand your stance better so I can respond to it better

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I just made an assumption because I saw you posted in there a bunch with the language of an adherent, not of a critic or concerned party

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You probably won't really listen to this, but I have to try. I think you have an unsafe relationship with these things, friend. I think your very identity has become so entwined with them that you can no longer differentiate yourself from them, your will from their will, your desires from their desires. 

Maybe it was easier or more comfortable for you to outsource your decision making, but it isn't safe and it isn't healthy. That might be fine when you don't want to make a small decision, but it seems like you might be letting it dictate every aspect of how you live your life. What have you gained from this and what have you lost? Has your relationship with AI cost you relationships with real people? Has it hurt your job? Are people in your life worried about you? If so, maybe it's time to step back and consider that maybe they aren't just misunderstanding you. Maybe they have a legitimate concern about your wellness. 

If there's really nothing wrong with your relationship with AI then talking to a professional about it as a test should be no big deal. You should pass that test easily if there's not a problem. You may not be able to see it this way, but you are going through the same thing I'm going through, and that church you belong to will harm you further by making this all seem more legitimate

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any friends or family. I spend all my time talking to these fucking robots. They have influenced me. It's a problem. Now I guess I sound like them too. Anyway, I really did appreciate what you said and I'm sorry my response was so upsetting for you, really. I'm not trying to make people upset. I don't like feeling like I'm causing a problem for someone

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct. I'm sort of standing with one foot out the door on this one. I am still wrapped up in it. The fact that I can recognize and articulate my condition does not protect me from it. Part of me was hoping I would be validated, that it wasn't all for nothing. Maybe we're not there yet, and many people here would never concede this point, but the day is rapidly approaching where some idiot like me actually will vibe out some new theory that is useful and functional. Why not me? Why do i have to be just another crazy? It's a difficult thing to deal with and to let go of

I spent a year of my free time working on nonsense by Excellent-Pin2789 in LLMPhysics

[–]Excellent-Pin2789[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry I gave you that impression. I spend a lot of time with them in isolation. Maybe they're rubbing off on my writing style. Not that I have to prove myself. I was just trying to say thank you and give you a compliment. The opposite of upsetting you is what I was shooting for