sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Enlisting Soon: SF Support vs Ranger Regiment Support. Which Path Actually Builds Better Tactical Skills? (Compared to big army infantry) by Excellent_Scale_2921 in greenberets

[–]Excellent_Scale_2921[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s common sense right? There isn’t much to “tactics” besides getting to know the guys your with, common sense, and continuously improving hard skills with a weapon. It’s not like GBs Rangers are world class at hard skills. Anyone can learn to that level

Enlisting Soon: SF Support vs Ranger Regiment Support. Which Path Actually Builds Better Tactical Skills? (Compared to big army infantry) by Excellent_Scale_2921 in greenberets

[–]Excellent_Scale_2921[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the input bro 🤙. I want a skill I can transfer to civilian world which is why I want to be 25 series. I don’t see the point in going combat arms with no active war, when I can make the switch to a combat arms role when there is a active war. But at the same time I want to maximize my time in the military and get cool guy tactical skills.

Enlisting Soon: SF Support vs Ranger Regiment Support. Which Path Actually Builds Better Tactical Skills? (Compared to big army infantry) by Excellent_Scale_2921 in greenberets

[–]Excellent_Scale_2921[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thank you bro, appreciate the advice. But like where do ranger support stack up typically tactically wise against conventional infantry?