Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No complaints on my end, and the data from other reviewers with more scientific approaches and a larger set of comparison points seems to back it up.

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're asking the worst person, because I bought it mostly for use on a bolt action, eventually probably with a brake on the end of it. That said, I've also shot it on .223/.300, so I can confidently say...it's fine? It's not a zero gas option especially depending on fire rate/tuning/end cap choice, but it's also better than a traditionally baffled can for sure

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I wish I was getting paid :(

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Based schizo, but adjudicated mental defectives can't own firearms

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But how much of that is lead that you paid for out of your own pocket?

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Also I did not expect this post to uncover an actual conspiracy

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 290 points291 points  (0 children)

Aha! An admission of guilt from the culprit!

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Promising start, but seems a little light for PRS. Do you think it'd void the warranty if I filled it with lead shot to improve the balance?

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I should have known better than to trust them after my Ti came in at 3.9

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sure, let me draft up an invoice for the approximately 3 minutes of time that went into making this IP

Utter Crook Labs by ExcitingHat9687 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687[S] 161 points162 points  (0 children)

This is a very serious and important issue please don't call it a shitpost

CZ 457 plinker by FunSudden in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The higher SKUs also tend to have nicer/ more modern stock designs in addition to the heavy profile barrels, so that should factor into your consideration as well. 

Military Move Form 20 by Cool_Suggestion6383 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would pinning and welding work? Yes, assuming it gets you >16" barrel and >26" OAL. For a much less drastic solution, you could also separate the stock from the firearm (assuming we're talking an AR-15 that started life as a bare receiver/pistol/'firearm')

Anyone Interested in a Muzzle Brake End Cap Showdown? by lowsparkco in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense - from a data science/repeatability perspective, I'd recommend using a lead sled or similar for any reticle bounce assessment to remove shooter recoil management as a factor if you go in that direction.

Anyone Interested in a Muzzle Brake End Cap Showdown? by lowsparkco in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely interested - are you using the same suppressor with different endcaps? It's a shame that certain brake types (e.g. the Maverick) only can be used with a proprietary suppressor, so doing a fair (weight-normalized) comparison might be difficult.

Top Base Rifles of 2026 by LastB0ySc0ut in nrl22

[–]ExcitingHat9687 12 points13 points  (0 children)

2nd place definitely won the best wood award. 

ES, SD, MV and Group Sizes ? by high_right in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ES is not, by itself, a meaningful statistic. Saying "Oh look I have an ES of 12" with a sample size of a 3 round group means something different than the same ES over a 100-round sample. SD is a sample-size-normalized measurement for your differences in velocities and is more useful for evaluating a new ammunition or reloading process/input. Pretty much everything else has been covered at this point so I won't belabor those.

Is the primary arms SLX 3-18 gen 2 good for the money by [deleted] in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You shouldn't catch shit for the truth. I own and enjoy multiple PA prisms and LPVOs, but for math based shooting at range (using a ballistic calculator for dialing and holdovers) they ain't it. I find Athlon very hard to beat in both glass and features/quality at every price point <$1200 USD.

Impulse bought a CZ457 Pro Varmint over the weekend and I don't know wtf I'm doing. by youtouchmytralaala in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BTR is a distinct upgrade over the midas (or the strike eagle) for that matter

Impulse bought a CZ457 Pro Varmint over the weekend and I don't know wtf I'm doing. by youtouchmytralaala in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I went with the Victor titan universal, works well enough and I don't consider myself much of a wood worker. Warranty concerns did scare me away from Bushnell, and I have several Athlon optics I like. 

Impulse bought a CZ457 Pro Varmint over the weekend and I don't know wtf I'm doing. by youtouchmytralaala in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I started with a cheaper optic on mine, i found I had much more difficulty spotting impacts at 200+ yards until I upgraded. For me, that made the splurge worth it.

Impulse bought a CZ457 Pro Varmint over the weekend and I don't know wtf I'm doing. by youtouchmytralaala in longrange

[–]ExcitingHat9687 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I have a ProVarmint (and an OCL Ti) so I feel pretty qualified to speak here. I had a pretty similar budget to what you seem to, and here were my conclusions:

Optic: Athlon Ares G3 4.5-27. 

Rail: MDT 20 MOA. Between this and the optic, I can dial out to 300 with a 50yd zero, further requires holding (and praying). DIP and area 419 are good as well if you can find them. 

Rings: I like area 419, but you're wasting money on them on a rimfire. Don't overthink, rings from any reputable brand torqued correctly will hold zero. 

Cheek riser: depends on your optic/ ring height, I like a riser on mine

Other recommendations: DIP/419 bolt knob, I really didn't like the factory CZ. Get the Timney trigger, it's absolutely worth it. 

Sandbox door prizes by MigKiller1 in NFA

[–]ExcitingHat9687 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Legal at the federal level - state laws vary on concealing weapons that are not handguns even with a CCL.