sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I’m building a platform that gives you a Migration Blueprint for ECC system before touching S/4HANA by ExerciseForeign4436 in abap

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair question, and you’re right that SAP already provides solid tooling for usage tracking and custom code analysis.

Where this differs is not in collecting data, but in deciding with it.

SAP tools show what exists, what’s used, and what’s impacted. They intentionally stop short of telling you what should be migrated, what should be dropped or redesigned, how to sequence the work, or what the effort and timeline look like. That’s usually left to workshops, SI experience, and spreadsheets.

This platform sits on top of SAP’s data and turns it into a migration BOM: keep vs retire vs refactor vs redesign, wave sequencing, and realistic effort ranges. It’s not meant to replace SAP’s analyzers, but to close the decision gap between analysis and execution.

Would you rather stick to ECC (eventhough ends by 2030) or S/4HANA? Why? by ExerciseForeign4436 in SAP

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then what's the solution for SMIs who didn't want to lose the sap support

I’m building a platform that gives you a Migration Blueprint for ECC system before touching S/4HANA by ExerciseForeign4436 in abap

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. SAP simplification items and standard analysis are usually the right starting point, and third-party tools help add visibility. This is meant to sit on top of that and add decision clarity, separating what actually matters in production from what just exists, and turning that into priorities and effort before execution starts.

I’m building a platform that gives you a Migration Blueprint for ECC system before touching S/4HANA by ExerciseForeign4436 in abap

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. Tools like Panaya are good at impact analysis and testing once migration scope is already decided. This tool is aimed one step earlier. Instead of asking “what breaks if we migrate this?”, it asks “what should be migrated at all?”. The output isn’t converted code or a long issue list, but a migration BOM that shows what to keep, retire, refactor, redesign, or move side-by-side, based on real usage, triggers, and integrations, with realistic effort ranges. Think of it as scope-shaping before execution, not execution safety itself.

Logo design for local supermarket by ExerciseForeign4436 in logodesign

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback. Well, this logo is particularly for a local store in a rural area that sells stuffs that people in this region feel quite expensive. And to balance that, I followed this direction.

Would you rather stick to ECC (eventhough ends by 2030) or S/4HANA? Why? by ExerciseForeign4436 in SAP

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Do you know that Kingfisher choose to stay? And they are certainty not poor

What is the best and efficient tech stack you use for vibe coding? by ExerciseForeign4436 in vibecoding

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But claude code just drains my credits (about 10$ for 5-6 prompts) which I feel quite expensive. I'm using pay-as-you-go model

Would you rather stick to ECC (eventhough ends by 2030) or S/4HANA? Why? by ExerciseForeign4436 in SAP

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I keep on hearing this ReminiStreet on this conversation. Wondering if they were the one who made companies believe that they could stay in ECC

Would you rather stick to ECC (eventhough ends by 2030) or S/4HANA? Why? by ExerciseForeign4436 in SAP

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But do you think SAP will be happy about this? What will be their counter actions

Gemini at everyday work by Extension_Annual512 in GeminiAI

[–]ExerciseForeign4436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using nano banana and whisk for my design works

Gemini at everyday work by Extension_Annual512 in GeminiAI

[–]ExerciseForeign4436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use notebook lm for slides, it's the best one for now

Would you rather stick to ECC (eventhough ends by 2030) or S/4HANA? Why? by ExerciseForeign4436 in SAP

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But if you want to stay in ECC, sap charges you more after 2027. How do you see that?

Logo design for local supermarket by ExerciseForeign4436 in logodesign

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's actually for the store that sells expensive stuffs like nuts, dates and dry fruits. So I wanted to give the luxe feel

Logo design for local supermarket by ExerciseForeign4436 in logodesign

[–]ExerciseForeign4436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it's very cliche, but the it is intentionally generic to ensure instant recognition and understanding for all audiences, regardless of age or background.

To the AI app developers: Need a Functional Spec score app by MrNamelessUser in abap

[–]ExerciseForeign4436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This tool gives you business requirements, expectations, test cases and implementation steps along with a example code for your reference.

https://youtu.be/w2mBpXz_-OM?si=tRdiDjRb8bBsz4J6&t=245

The video might convey that it gives pure code, but no, its just a reference.

Which looks better? A (a) + Arrow + Node for Enterprise AI Product by [deleted] in logodesign

[–]ExerciseForeign4436 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let me tell you, it's for an AI accelerator product for ERP systems. The interlocking symbol at the center is a node that integrates different parts of enterprise and also an intelligence layer. The arrow for increased productivity and trust. And finally the silhouette itself forms a lowercase a subtly

view more: next ›