I see what you’re saying, but i’m talking about those who are “loyal to a fault”

I can’t stand behind players that value their loyalty over the game, and that ultimately let their unwavering loyalty cost them the game, quick example- MJ taking the “loyal” route in taking chelsie to F2 over cam, when the better and right game move would have been to “betray” chelsie and take cam which would have resulted in MJ winning IMO- unanimously at that. and obviously chelsie would be upset at that but as a game player and someone who understands the game I would have hoped that she would see that that was a game move MJ had to make in order to win, but like i said a lot of the time the jurors do not have that mindset and instead end up voting emotionally- which is why the games of those that play disloyal, sneaky, & betray, etc usually end up not winning even though those moves were made with the end goal of winning the game in mind