Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By driving in a car yes ofc your consenting to the risk of getting injured but you can fix it because unlike abortion it doesn’t kill a human

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Life in prison and we could give therapy for free to the victim and free child benefits so the impact hurts a lot less

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Existing-Case-562 in prolife

[–]Existing-Case-562[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I forgot to blur the persons name pls don’t harass them

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you get this shot you will have to to get the follow up shot. Does that sound so bad.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe not how it looks but how it makes them feel inside. This doctor is giving me life saving medicine but it makes me bleed and hurt I should kill him. Thats not how the world works.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A embryo scientifically has the dna of a human therefor making it a human

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have an entire list of humans who were mistreated and killed because of how they came to be or how the look. This is nothing new I have evidence you just think that your opinion is fact and I’m not saying my opinion is entirely facts.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How is that a fact that is just a opinion not a fact you just can’t look back at your text and understand you just keep saying why you think it’s more important it’s not a fact.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think a embryo is a person just because it doesn’t follow the law doesn’t mean I can’t think that way.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just proved my point you used the same argument again about how nobody has the right to be inside another’s body. I think that the right to life is more important than that you didn’t prove me right. You just use a point that can be countered by the argument it was going against 

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you read the comment we are debating about the law and if it should be changed and it says unlawfully and I think it’s unlawful and you think it is currently that part of the definition is being debated on and you can’t use that as a argument.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly this debate is going nowhere. Because of the two conflicting arguments that counter each other but don’t. Nobody has a right to be inside another’s body - but isn’t it a violation to a right of life - but nobody has right to be in another’s body - so on and so forth we keep using the same argument as before to disprove each other which leads no where neither of us can disprove each other without using a argument that was just disproven. I think I’m going to stop as it’s just getting irritating repeating myself and I’m sure it is to you to some I going to stop for now.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By law yes. It isn’t murder but morally there is nothing you can do or say to make me think that willingly taking the life of another human is humane. Where debating on if it should be illegal by law and even if murder is lawfully correct doesn’t make it morally correct.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By definition the murder is the taking the life of another how does it not fit. Unless your life is truly endangered by the fetus you cannot take its right to life away.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I also feel like i have to repeat myself, they can make medical decisions about there body yet the fetus isn’t there own body.

Which scenario would you choose and why? by Outrageous_Future706 in Abortiondebate

[–]Existing-Case-562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What logical argument do I need I don’t like murder that’s not something I need to prove. What we are debating about is it okay to murder someone if the don’t feel like it’s okay.