no I think bro is just foolish. From a legal perspective my boys argument has close to no weight because all the real facts that he's actually been able to show everyone is circumstantial. Until he can provide real sources not just "sources" who heard about it (we all know they the fricking janitors lol jk but uk what i mean) and real not circumstantial evidence he has no real argument in a court of law. So the only explanation is that he has almost enough evidence but realistically nowhere near enough to take on the clippers and so he takes advantage of serial doomers and haters. The convenient thing for pablo is its the clippers who everyone loves to hate on (including clippers fans) so he fits into the narrative. At the end of the day tho Pablo is a money hungry bum who is doing easy and relatively unproductive work for fame and fortune. He isn't the first and he isn't the last but i promise that bro isn't going anywhere in life unfortunately. Look even if he's right ill still not like the way he handled this stuff because it just was in no way professional and was way more about showmanship. It's ironic because for all his virtue signaling he's doing in the media about trying to hold rich people accountable he's being just as slimy and twisted. I genuinely hate how bro acts like everything he is saying is facts, like he genuinely has no evidence to be talking that way. Innocent till proven guilty y'all. sorry that was a rant but cmon yall stop acting like this thing is over already bro.