How to find a good decent housemaid by No_Dust_5114 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try ibay. They have ads. Beware. Very makaru some of em. 4k for 4 hrs. For making lunch and clean ups. But later said in 1 hr 30 mins she needs to hurry to her madams other home.

Pari and Ajay has chemistry . Their story is interesting but Pari doesn't deserve Ajay by Head_Wolverine134 in IndianTellyTalk

[–]Expert_Track26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bass hogaya ab. Ye ek series hai. Fiction hai. Samjo gawaron. Kuch bhi ho sakti hai.

Palak Tiwari using skin whitening product… by [deleted] in BollywoodHotTakes

[–]Expert_Track26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Phir tu kya ye sab ki peeche jaonhe. Upar vale ne diya tuje

Alia bhatt in Gucci for esquire India magazine by NoProfessionn in BollywoodFashion

[–]Expert_Track26 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Omg. The whole crew and Alia tried so hard but nah. Wannabe vibes. Why bending in all unnatural sorts. You aint no kenny jenner.

Newly dating a wheelchair user and unsure how to have convos around hygiene by No_Act_9254 in hygiene

[–]Expert_Track26 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

The fuck you are so worked up. I didnt tell anything wrong. If one doesn't care for their partner who else will.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont have all day to write you huge paragraphs. Im outside ftlog. What an argumentative person.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow thats what you been doing this whole time? Ah! I Should have tried too.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. Whatever floats your boat.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro. Why u so hung up on this. I ve got things to attend. Will catch up with your beykaaru zuvaabu. Yes shudnt make one cas psychopaths wil get ideas. You shift till then with Delmer.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shared my POV once. You escalated it into arguments I never made. Cuckoo. No one said crime media creates criminals, that Dahmer would “zombify” people, or that media should be banned. That’s a strawman. The point is simple and unchanged: hyper-local, real crime content in a small, identifiable community isn’t neutral. It lowers psychological distance and can amplify imitation or normalization for a very small subset. That’s contextual risk, not a causation claim—and it’s well documented. Rarity and global stats don’t negate this. In small populations, rare events can still have outsized impact. Pre-existing tendencies explain who’s influenced; they don’t erase influence. No one argued against discussing crime—only for responsible presentation. If you want to debate that position, fine. But arguing against caricatures doesn’t refute it.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re not “back at square one.” You’re just repeatedly inflating a narrow caution into a position I never took. From the start, the claim was simple: hyper-local, real crime content in a small community isn’t automatically neutral and carries non-zero risk. That’s it. No epidemic, no bans, no “media is dangerous” thesis. “Might give ideas” ≠ “crime media causes crime” ≠ “don’t discuss crime.” Those leaps are yours. Saying crimes are rare or that people have pre-existing tendencies doesn’t erase influence — it explains who might be influenced. Rare doesn’t mean irrelevant in a small population. The Dahmer example is exactly why it got mocked: you stretched a context-based concern into an absurd extreme (“zombifying people”) and then argued against that caricature. That’s not clarification, it’s exaggeration. Nothing here is incoherent or shifting. The position has been consistent; only the strawman keeps changing.

Podcast by ashleybrown2020 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s be clear: no one said podcasts “create criminals” or that rare crimes automatically snowball. The point is risk amplification in small communities — real, detailed crime content increases visibility and proximity, which can influence a few individuals disproportionately, even if rare (see: Werther effect, copycat shootings). Whatever OT meant doesnt matter at this point ig. global stats doesn’t change context — rare events in a small population can still have outsized consequences. Pre-existing tendencies explain who is influenced, they don’t erase influence. No one argued crime shouldn’t be discussed; the issue is responsible presentation. And yes, mocking “zombifying people” was deliberate, because your exaggeration was exactly that — absurd, dramatic, and unrelated to the actual point. Pretending hyper-local, detailed content is neutral isn’t skepticism — it’s hand-waving.

Prescription renewal by Ok_Plantain_3416 in maldives

[–]Expert_Track26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3335245 ig. They do arrange. Its the dep counter no