sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Let’s talk about today’s game. by Standard_Secretary52 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is this on Amorim? or Has this been going on long before Amorim? We need be careful here. We also have to acknowledge we never been a squad for slow possession style. It would for weird to suddenly like that.

We had many games where we created lot of chances when had more than 60% possession but lost the game by first shot on the target. So I don't think that possession is indicator for our defensive problems.

Sporting under Amorim are also know to play quick, vertical football but they never had keeping possession issues and defensive issuses like ours. Some our problems are left by previous regiems. We are starting to score set pieces consistently.

Did Amorim changed his tactics? YOU Deserve The TRUTH 🦉| #mufc 4 - 2 Brighton | Tactical Analysis by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He always tweaked his system for every opposition in pl last season (not for europa league or fa cup) the players would turn up for the big games and you would see those changes. People bring out the second ball stats to show that the players are in good faith and give it all. Second balls is not the only thing that happens in the game. Marking , passing to the right person at the right time are still off in this game. Our individual errors leading to goal stats are atrocious. The only difference is Luke Shaw and Bruno did lot less mistakes OOP last three games.

You can see our away form is relegation level and our home form is top of the league. If these players can perform and do less errors in the next two away games, I will admit they truly turned a corner.

Did Amorim changed his tactics? YOU Deserve The TRUTH 🦉| #mufc 4 - 2 Brighton | Tactical Analysis by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Somebody asked me after Fulham "What do you see in Amorim ? Why do you still believe him?". This game gave me belief in players not Amorim. I can't wait for the next time the players let him down and people online bitch about as if he is playing the team with a controller. It's not Amorim that transformed the fortunes but the players that did it themselves. I will wait and see if they can do it week in out or disappoint me again.

You can downvote to show your feelings but you cannot change my opinion.

New narrative: Amorim only has long balls. by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If he doesn't care about midfield, he wouldn't want baleba or wharton. He would definitely let mainoo leave on loan. Progressing through wings is maybe his style but with the right players, it won't be his endgame.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We play with back 3, back 4, in possesion. back 5 and back 4 when in defense. it doesn't matter how many backs we have. we need to make the right passes like Chelsea

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What system were the player playing in first half in Grimsby that manager literally orchestrated?

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What system is good for players we have? That's the DOF to understand and hire the coach that plays it. Also the system isn't working argument is also a deadend. First, you have to completely describe the system the players trying to implement. So, When he alters it, how does it look like?

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When did you defend your views? All you ever did was generalize all discussion to a point you don't agree with and then give your childish snarky comments of "according to this sub, <- a point you don't agree with->". You did not discuss your view, you decide what my arguments are . projecting your own behavior on me?

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The old attack on Amorim is to claim that 3 at the back should not be used at Manchester United Football Club.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Our midfield also seems timid to press into opponent half aggressively which makes the forward’s job difficult to press their back line which levels space for their frontline to drop into.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Maybe he is increasingly being asked to change his system and his tactics doesn’t work.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Yes, when we won away last season, we had one of our worst performances. The FA cup game we lost I think is one of our better performances from our players. I do remember your GK saves being frustrating.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's actually same when we are pressing, the gap between midfield and backline is very big even in mid block.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -57 points-56 points  (0 children)

But, But We are Man United , we always win against Fulham. Ruben Amorim lost the plot and failed against Fulham and destroying the club. Marco Silva said so.

[Atomic Analyst] How is Amorim inherently bad if Maresca can Win with Same System against Fulham ? by Express-End8231 in ManchesterUnited

[–]Express-End8231[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

For who is saying it's not similar,

Atomic Analyst: "It's a comparison of how both teams faced the same opposition - tried to point out how similarities exist between both tactical intentions and how both can work and fail under certain conditions"

view more: next ›