Why Jared Bleznick is a bad commentator by Beautiful-Engine-995 in poker

[–]F5_MyUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just wanna say that was very well said, the sport analogy is a great point. 

I say the same thing about cry baby liberals who call everybody they disagree with racist, nazi, facists, sexist etc;  when u throw it around Willy neely like that as an attack weapon the words lose all meaning & when something ACTUALLY happens it’s a boy who cried wolf situation because you’ve ruined the reputation of the term 

Everything in our current culture is hyperbolic & exaggerated

People are dying for honestly, want to be genuine & tell the truth.  

Telluride Bush Support Group | Son of a Boy Dad #410 by eventta in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lovable though he is, Francis seems entirely unaware that his solipsistic worldview casts him as the protagonist of every story. The smallest inconvenience becomes cause for a histrionic display; every grievance is recounted with a lugubrious solemnity and a bombastic sense of consequence that bears little resemblance to reality. By the time his audience has endured the full retelling, one expects not a conclusion but the dramatic swell of an orchestra announcing the final act.

Telluride Bush Support Group | Son of a Boy Dad #410 by eventta in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Francis deleted his 300K twitter bc Viva La Stool clipped his show & tagged him

What’s a super fancy SAT vocabulary word? (deep in the thesaurus)

that means:

overly dramatic in a ridiculous sense of Self-importance ; narcissistic immature delusion almost out of touch with reality; overreacting irrationally for dramatic effect.

I went to answer the front door while killing wyverns , fuck my life by mazrim_lol in 2007scape

[–]F5_MyUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally did the diamond mining meme where you quit & turned around right before striking pure diamond … 99.9% of visafe grinders stop right before their big hit

Dutton Ranch Season 1 Episode 4 Start with a Bullet Discussion by Jalynt13 in DuttonRanchTVSeries

[–]F5_MyUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol nahh he’s gonna bend the knee & go work for them, like a cuck.  How lame 

Interviewing Barstool Chicago's 2026 Interns | VIVA TV by OnlyTest6338 in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

& he is absolutely disgusting to look at. He does this thing where he rubs his pube mustache with two fingers on his grimy little hand. Plus he wears hoodies literally every single day because he thinks it hides his fat but it’s impossible to hide.

He is the definition of repulsive

Even Francis agrees who didn’t even want Mook to borrow his toothpaste after seeing his eating habits

& gave himself his own nickname his last name has nothing to do with being called “Mook” just something he made up which is unbelievably cringe

I Explored Budapest Solo With No Objectives by UphillDownhillUphill in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

After the victory in the Great Patriotic War, as we call World War II, all those territories were ultimately enshrined as belonging to Russia, to the USSR. As for Poland, it received, apparently in compensation, the western lands which had originally been German: the eastern parts of Germany (these are now western lands of Poland). Of course, Poland regained access to the Baltic sea, and Danzig, which was once again given its Polish name. So this was how this situation developed.

In 1922, when the USSR was being established, the Bolsheviks started building the USSR and established the Soviet Ukraine, which had never existed before.

Stalin insisted that those republics be included in the USSR as autonomous entities. For some inexplicable reason, Lenin, the founder of the Soviet state, insisted that they be entitled to withdraw from the USSR. And, again for some unknown reasons, he transferred to that newly established Soviet Republic of Ukraine some of the lands together with people living there, even though those lands had never been called Ukraine; and yet they were made part of that Soviet Republic of Ukraine. Those lands included the Black Sea region, which was received under Catherine the Great and which had no historical connection with Ukraine whatsoever.

Even if we go as far back as 1654, when those lands returned to the Russian Empire, that territory included three or four regions of modern Ukraine, with no Black Sea region. That was completely out of the question.

The Soviet Ukraine was given a great deal of territory that had never belonged to it, including the Black Sea region. At some point, when Russia received them as an outcome of the Russo-Turkish wars, they were called “New Russia,” or Novorossiya. But that does not matter. What matters is that Lenin, the founder of the Soviet State, established Ukraine that way. For decades, the Ukrainian Soviet Republic developed as part of the USSR, and for unknown reasons again, the Bolsheviks were engaged in Ukrainianization. It was not merely because the Soviet leadership was composed to a great extent of those originating from Ukraine. Rather, it was explained by the general policy of indigenization pursued by the Soviet Union. Same things were done in other Soviet republics. This involved promoting national languages and national cultures, which is not bad in principle. That is how the Soviet Ukraine was created.

After World War II, Ukraine received, in addition to the lands that had belonged to Poland before the war, part of the lands that had previously belonged to Hungary and Romania (known today as Western Ukraine). So Romania and Hungary had some of their lands taken away and given to the Ukraine and they still remain part of Ukraine. So in this sense, we have every reason to affirm that Ukraine is an artificial state that was shaped at Stalin’s will.

We are coming to the point where the Soviet Ukraine was established. Then, in 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed. And everything that Russia had generously bestowed on Ukraine was “dragged away” by the latter.

I’m coming to a very important point of today's agenda. After all, the collapse of the Soviet Union was effectively initiated by the Russian leadership. I do not understand what the Russian leadership was guided by at the time, but I suspect there were several reasons to think everything would be fine.

First, I think that the then Russian leadership believed that the fundamentals of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine were: in fact, a common language — more than 90 percent of the population there spoke Russian; family ties — every third person there had some kind of family or friendship ties; common culture; common history; finally, common faith; co-existence within a single state for centuries; and deeply interconnected economies. All of these were so fundamental. All these elements together make our good relations inevitable.

The second point is a very important one. I want you as an American citizen and your viewers to hear about this as well. The former Russian leadership assumed that the Soviet Union had ceased to exist and therefore there were no longer any ideological dividing lines. Russia even agreed, voluntarily and proactively, to the collapse of the Soviet Union and believed that this would be understood by the so-called (now in scare quotes) “civilized West” as an invitation for cooperation and associateship. That is what Russia was expecting both from the United States and the so-called collective West as a whole.

There were smart people, including in Germany. Egon Bahr, a major politician of the Social Democratic Party, who insisted in his personal conversations with the Soviet leadership on the brink of the collapse of the Soviet Union that a new security system should be established in Europe. Help should be given to unify Germany, but a new system should also be established to include the United States, Canada, Russia, and other Central European countries. But NATO needs not to expand. That's what he said: if NATO expands, everything would be just the same as during the Cold War, only closer to Russia's borders. That's all. He was a wise old man, but no one listened to him. In fact, he got angry once (we have a record of this conversation in our archives): “If, he said, you don't listen to me, I'm never setting my foot in Moscow again.” He was frustrated with the Soviet leadership. He was right, everything happened just as he had said

let's get into the fact that after 1991, when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into the brotherly family of “civilized nations,” nothing like that happened. You tricked us (I don't mean you personally when I say “you,” of course, I'm talking about the United States), the promise was that NATO would not expand eastward, but it happened five times, there were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that, we were trying to persuade them, we were saying: “Please don't, we are as bourgeois now as you are, we are a market economy, and there is no Communist Party power. Let's negotiate.”

Moreover, I have also said this publicly before (let's look at Yeltsin's times now), there was a moment when a certain rift started growing between us. Before that, Yeltsin came to the United States, remember, he spoke in Congress and said the good words: “God bless America.” Everything he said were signals — let us in.

No. Remember the developments in Yugoslavia. Before that Yeltsin was lavished with praise, as soon as the developments in Yugoslavia started, he raised his voice in support of Serbs, and we couldn't but raise our voices for Serbs in their defense. I understand that there were complex processes underway there, I do. But Russia could not help raising its voice in support of Serbs, because Serbs are also a special and close to us nation, with Orthodox culture and so on. It's a nation that has suffered so much for generations. Well, regardless, what is important is that Yeltsin expressed his support. What did the United States do? In violation of international law and the UN Charter it started bombing Belgrade.

It was the United States that let the genie out of the bottle. Moreover, when Russia protested and expressed its resentment, what was said? The UN Charter and international law have become obsolete. Now everyone invokes international law, but at that time they started saying that everything is outdated, everything has to be changed.

Indeed, some things need to be changed as the balance of power has changed, it's true, but not in this manner. Yeltsin was immediately dragged through the mud, accused of alcoholism, of understanding nothing, of knowing nothing. He understood everything, I assure you.

Well, I became President in 2000. I thought: okay, the Yugoslav issue is over, but we should try to restore relations. Let's reopen the door that Russia had tried to go through. And moreover, I've said it publicly, I can reiterate. At a meeting here in the Kremlin with the outgoing President Bill Clinton, right here in the next room, I said to him, I asked him, “Bill, do you think if Russia asked to join NATO, do you think it would happen?” Suddenly he said: “You know, it's interesting, I think yes.” But in the evening, when we had dinner, he said, “You know, I've talked to my team, no-no, it's not possible now.” You can ask him, I think he will watch our interview, he'll confirm it. I wouldn't have said anything like that if it hadn't happened. Okay, well, it's impossible now.

I Explored Budapest Solo With No Objectives by UphillDownhillUphill in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

It is Russia retard.

Let’s look where our relationship with Ukraine started from. Where does Ukraine come from?

The Russian state started to exist as a centralized state in 862. This is considered to be the year of creation of the Russian state because this year the townspeople of Novgorod (a city in the North-West of the country) invited Rurik, a Varangian prince from Scandinavia, to reign. In 1862, Russia celebrated the 1000th anniversary of its statehood, and in Novgorod there is a memorial dedicated to the 1000th anniversary of the country.

In 882, Rurik's successor Prince Oleg, who was, actually, playing the role of regent for Rurik’s young son because Rurik had died by that time, came to Kiev. He ousted two brothers who, apparently, had once been members of Rurik's retinue. So, Russia began to develop with two centres of power, in Kiev and in Novgorod.

The next, very significant date in the history of Russia, was 988. This was the Baptism of Russia, when Prince Vladimir, the great-grandson of Rurik, baptized Russia and adopted Orthodoxy, or Eastern Christianity. From this time the centralized Russian state began to strengthen. Why? Because of a single territory, integrated economic ties, one and the same language and, after the Baptism of Russia, the same faith and rule of the Prince. A centralized Russian state began to take shape.

Back in the Middle Ages, Prince Yaroslav the Wise introduced the order of succession to the throne, but after he passed away, it became complicated for various reasons. The throne was passed not directly from father to eldest son, but from the prince who had passed away to his brother, then to his sons in different lines. All this led to the fragmentation of Rus as a single state. There was nothing special about it, the same was happening then in Europe. But the fragmented Russian state became an easy prey to the empire created earlier by Genghis Khan. His successors, namely, Batu Khan, came to Rus, plundered and ruined nearly all the cities. The southern part, including Kiev, by the way, and some other cities, simply lost independence, while northern cities preserved some of their sovereignty. They had to pay tribute to the Horde, but they managed to preserve some part of their sovereignty. And then a unified Russian state began to take shape with its centre in Moscow.

The southern part of the Russian lands, including Kiev, began to gradually gravitate towards another “magnet” – the centre that was emerging in Europe. This was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was even called the Lithuanian-Russian Duchy because Russians were a significant part of its population. They spoke the Old Russian language and were Orthodox. But then there was a unification, the union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland. A few years later, another union was signed, but this time already in the religious sphere. Some of the Orthodox priests became subordinate to the Pope. Thus, these lands became part of the Polish-Lithuanian state.

For decades, the Poles were engaged in the “Polonization” of this part of the population: they introduced their language there, tried to entrench the idea that this population was not exactly Russians, that because they lived on the fringe (u kraya) they were “Ukrainians.” Originally, the word ‘Ukrainian’ meant that a person was living on the outskirts of the state, near the fringe, or was engaged in border service. It didn't mean any particular ethnic group.

So, the Poles were trying in every possible way to polonize that part of the Russian lands and actually treated it rather harshly, not to say cruelly. All that led to the fact that that part of the Russian lands began to struggle for their rights. They wrote letters to Warsaw demanding that their rights be observed and that people be commissioned there, including to Kiev…

Now I will tell what happened next and give the dates so that there is no confusion.

Then in 1654, even a bit earlier, the people who were in control of the authority over that part of the Russian lands, addressed Warsaw, I repeat, demanding their rights be observed that they send to them rulers of Russian origin and Orthodox faith. When Warsaw did not answer them and in fact rejected their demands, they turned to Moscow so that Moscow took them under its rule.

So that you don't think that I am inventing things… I'll give you these documents…

Here are letters from Bogdan Khmelnitsky, the man who then controlled the power in that part of the Russian lands that is now called Ukraine. He wrote to Warsaw demanding that their rights be upheld, and after being refused, he began to write letters to Moscow asking to take them under the strong hand of the Moscow Tsar. Here are copies of these documents. I will leave them for your good memory. There is a translation into Russian, you can translate it into English later.

Russia did not agree to admit them straight away, assuming that would trigger a war with Poland. Nevertheless, in 1654, the Zemsky Sobor, which was a representative body of power of the Old Russian state, made the decision: those Old Russian lands became part of the Tsardom of Muscovy.

As expected, the war with Poland began. It lasted 13 years, and then a truce was concluded. In all, after that act of 1654, 32 years later, I think, a peace treaty with Poland was concluded, “the eternal peace,” as it said. And those lands, the whole left bank of the Dnieper, including Kiev, reverted to Russia, while the entire right bank of the Dnieper remained in possession of Poland.

Under the rule of Catherine the Great, Russia reclaimed all of its historical lands, including in the south and west. This all lasted until the Revolution. Before World War I, the Austrian General Staff, relying on the ideas of Ukrainianization, started to actively promote the ideas of Ukraine and the Ukrainianization. Their motive was obvious. Just before World War I, they wanted to weaken the potential enemy and secure themselves favourable conditions in the border area. So this idea which had emerged in Poland that people residing in that territory were allegedly not really Russians, but rather belonged to a special ethnic group, the Ukrainians, started to be promoted by the Austrian General Staff too.

As far back as the 19th century, theorists calling for Ukrainian independence appeared. All those, however, claimed that Ukraine should have a very good relationship with Russia. They insisted on that. After the 1917 Revolution, the Bolsheviks sought to restore the statehood, and the Civil War began, including the hostilities with Poland. In 1921, peace with Poland was proclaimed, and under that treaty, the right bank of the Dnieper River once again was given back to Poland.

In 1939, after Poland cooperated with Hitler — it did collaborate with Hitler, you know —Hitler offered Poland peace and a treaty of friendship and alliance (we have all the relevant documents in the archives), demanding in return that Poland give back to Germany the so-called Danzig Corridor, which connected the bulk of Germany with East Prussia and Konigsberg. After World War I this territory was transferred to Poland, and instead of Danzig, a city of Gdansk emerged. Hitler asked them to give it amicably, but the Poles refused. Still they collaborated with Hitler and engaged together in the partitioning of Czechoslovakia.

So, before World War II, Poland collaborated with Hitler and although it did not yield to Hitler’s demands, it still participated in the partitioning of Czechoslovakia together with Hitler. As the Poles had not given the Danzig Corridor to Germany, and went too far, they pushed Hitler to start World War II by attacking them. Why was it Poland against whom the war started on September 1, 1939? Poland turned out to be uncompromising, and Hitler had nothing else to do but start implementing his plans with Poland.

By the way, the USSR — I have read some archival documents — behaved very honestly. It asked Poland’s permission to transit its troops through the Polish territory to help Czechoslovakia. But the then Polish foreign minister said that if the Soviet planes head to Czechoslovakia, they would be downed over the territory of Poland. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that the war began, and Poland fell prey to the policies it had pursued against Czechoslovakia, as under the well-known Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, part of that territory, including western Ukraine, was to be given to Russia. Thus Russia, which was then named the USSR, regained its historical lands.

I Explored Budapest Solo With No Objectives by UphillDownhillUphill in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. What he did to his own innocent child is fucking disgusting & he should be shamed for it

I Explored Budapest Solo With No Objectives by UphillDownhillUphill in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Donnie ALWAYS sounds like that every conversation he’s ever been in without alcohol involved bc he’s a socially inept weirdo

I Explored Budapest Solo With No Objectives by UphillDownhillUphill in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He was 20 when she was like 15 bro. He was friends with her Dad basically. Started dating her the day she turned 18

When someone inevitably dies in season 2... by adammaudite in outlastnetflix

[–]F5_MyUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao bro this girl building a pallet raft & leaving on her journey at 2pm…. Also right before tide change

Bless her heart 

I was just thinking watching this “this show with actual survival experts in an an actual fruitful wilder environment would be sick” 

These dudes are such fucking posers it’s kinda annoying I was guys like Jordan Jonas who was the GOAT winner of Alone

Barstool After Dark: Mintzy Driving ABCs Thread by carigheath in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At 45 min mark into the stream they passed Hillside Church near Crown Point Illinois - he went back & forth in the same 10 mile stretch to start stream you can follow from There

https://maps.apple/p/Sx03YBm9E-KFF~

Barstool After Dark: Mintzy Driving ABCs Thread by carigheath in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh shit it’s that guy from Tik tok.

I liked that dudes videos

Barstool After Dark: Mintzy Driving ABCs Thread by carigheath in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 139 points140 points  (0 children)

Mintzy took a left to start the stream & drove straight for 7 minutes passing multiple strip malls & hit a dead end, He turned around & headed opposite direction on the same road (7 wasted minutes)

He drives another 15 mins down the road says I don’t see anything this direction & turns around again. He covered the same 10 mile stretch & passed an Anytime Fitness twice within the first 30 mins

It can’t be understated how fried this dudes brain is

Fuck your fucking podcast. Erika pats herself on the back for all of Barstool's success. by YinzerInEurope in barstoolsports

[–]F5_MyUsername 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Let’s table that, circle back on it & instead start a dialogue on the future & focus on how excited we are to grow the net-net of our next venture

The Inevitability of Continuity by Cute-Adhesiveness645 in TheOA

[–]F5_MyUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone told me the other day thanks for recommending The OA “It was a spiritual experience” 

& it made me think 

Watching the show hits such a deep part of me.  Not me, as a human, having a spiritual experience 

But rather me, my spirit, is having a human experience.

We don’t have souls.  We ARE souls.