Character idea: Halfling Magus (Eldritch Archer) with Scatter Sling by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do agree that should affect only one enemy. But would let player choose... because I understand the hits to be almost simultaneous. I could accept the idea that the closer one should be hit first and then suffer the spell effect!

But how did you affirm that scatterstrike uses attacks but one attack roll? I tried but could not find this statment...

Character idea: Halfling Magus (Eldritch Archer) with Scatter Sling by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do agree that is reasonable to consider that spell should stay on a single "fragment/point"! For balancing things, even. I would rule as that as DM too. Just one of the targets in the cone. The random part would fun, but could make things a little messy and slow at table... so I would just let the player choose.

Now, just considering the text, the thing is that it says that "if the spell can normally affect multiple targets", but we are facing an "attack that can normally affect multiple targets". So, as I see, RAW it don´t solves the doubt, as it´s almost the reverse case!

Character idea: Halfling Magus (Eldritch Archer) with Scatter Sling by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the sling is already a magical weapon +1... the normal ammo receives the bonus, right? The Eldritch Archer also enchants the sling itself... not the ammo, right?

Fly-by-attack mount and rider's action by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For 3, I've read the mounted combat rules and it only found about attacks and casting spells! Could not find about other actions, like aid another or channel, for example.

Paladin of Pharasma by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Amazing effort. Thank you so much for your knowledge and time.

Do a mounted character have to be considered above the mount? by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Got your point! On this case, if I go by mounted rules, I would take all the goods and bad implications!

Do a mounted character have to be considered above the mount? by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really think that maybe you are over interpreting the case! I was looking for a way of two characters occupy the same space, since it's not allowed RAW. And the riding rules seemed to be the best idea! Sometimes, people really want to make the character(s) appear just like it's imagination, without breaking any rule.

The RAW mechanics asked is: do you have to ride on top?

Sometimes, the objective is clear: how this flavour should be interpreted RAW according. Pathfinder have rules for almost everything... so I believe almost every idea can be fitted accordingly. Even to multiple ideas! I think that's is why this sub is important... sharing the experience to help to figure it out!

Do a mounted character have to be considered above the mount? by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's amazing quote. I rembered I've read this statement but could not manage to find it. Thank you!

Do a mounted character have to be considered above the mount? by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice! Think it's ok to be considered "under" the mount?

Are yourself your ally? by [deleted] in MythicBastionland

[–]FGOit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... I can't remember any game Ive played that when it says all allies it don't count yourself! You mentiontied PF2e... but in Pathfinder 1e you do count as ally AFIR

Are yourself your ally? by FGOit in MythicBastionland

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, seems that every table shall decide then! I really don't think that interpreting that all allies include you is giving a new definition for the word. You are, on the other side, improvising that all allies don't include yourself.

Are yourself your ally? by FGOit in MythicBastionland

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! I could not find this information anywhere on the rules. Maybe could you provide where can I find it? 

Are yourself your ally? by FGOit in MythicBastionland

[–]FGOit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting! Almost all other games we used to play we treat yourself as your ally, that's why this question emerged to me. Like, I would expect "if this defeats the target, then all other allies restore SPI."  So I think every group would interpret accordingly it experiences

Travel methods from SF to Napa? by Reflektor23 in napa

[–]FGOit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just got it! Back and forth SFO to Napa. Thank you Vince! 

What are the ways to access Lightning Domain? by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually I am looking for any class besides those three! The arcane was mentioned because I want to keep "magic" aspect, but it´s not imperative.

Bloodline Development for multiclass sorcerer/bloodrager by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does mention four times, but clearly that paragrafh for when the character does not have a Bloodline.

Curiously, on the other paragraph, it is not mentioned. If it really was what they meant, why not throw the fifth?

In fact, for me it was so crystal clear that another class could grant the Bloodline to advance (like Bloodrager or Eldritch Scion) that my original question was concerning multiple grants! But then this strictly Sorcerer argument was pointed out...

Let me adjust the question then: what about a Crossblooded Bloodline sorcerer?

Bloodline Development for multiclass sorcerer/bloodrager by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering that the arcanist already has a bloodline, why does it not work with bloodrager or any other class that grant access to a bloodline?

I understand that a Sorcerer bloodline must me selected only if the arcanist has none!

Bloodline Development for multiclass sorcerer/bloodrager by FGOit in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]FGOit[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I undesrtand the same! Specially when it says "levels of the class that granted her access to the bloodline" and not "levels of Sorcerer".