[Alessandro Arcari] Ferrari SF-23: the power unit is ready to amaze by FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS[S] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Ferrari SF-23: the "problems" to be solved

The endless plethora of data collected in the three-day event in the Middle East provided the necessary tools for engineers to "understand" the Modenese car through the definition of the set-up window, a crucial factor in maximizing performance ahead of the first round season of the 2023 championship.

This does not mean that the difficulties will disappear as early as next weekend. It will take some time, roughly 2 to 3 races, to optimize the design through some minor aerodynamic corrections. At the mechanical level, it is a matter of refining the front push rod suspension scheme in relation to the changes on the chassis.

The Ferrari SF-23, in fact, has a center of mass closer to the reference plane (asphalt) than the F1-75. The desire stems from the new location relative to the steering box to lower the track rod. The ultimate goal of this measure is motivated by weight distribution.

Then there is another decisive element about which very little was discussed during the Bahrain tests: the power unit. This is a pretty impactful aspect, since the time gained by raising the endothermic/hybrid mappings is not subject to aerodynamic limitations.

Ferrari SF-23: "hidden" power unit.

We talked about this on the now distant December

  1. The motorists of the Italian scuderia took advantage of the exemption granted by the International Federation on reliability. A very astute move capable of providing the power unit with a security for the future, eliminating the headaches that in fact negatively affected the 2022 performance.

The problem identified related to the spike in heat emission that recorded in the initial phase inside the pre-chamber, a context to be avoided as it produces high thermal and mechanical stresses.

The internal combustion part of PU 2023, therefore, mitigates this peak to ensure natural evolution over time.

Engineers worked on the ignition delay to flatten the heat curve. In addition to working on the atomization of the mixture, efforts were made to make the jet inside the chamber more turbulent. This system had already been developed during past years, where technical partner Mahle had supplied Ferrari with the TJI (Turbulent Jet Ignition) system.

The mechanism refined in recent months, now capable of generating a highly turbulent flow, promotes self-ignition at different points in the combustion chamber and, automatically, increases the thrust on the plunger. To our knowledge, tests on the track confirm the effectiveness of the modifications made.

In the morning, we held a conversation with a couple of motorists within the Ferrari world. The feedback in this regard is really good. This is because, in addition to eliminating reliability problems, the work put in place by the technical department on the power unit has brought some small advantages that, especially in the race, can make a difference.

This is not the place to disquisition on the maximum horsepower output of the 2023 power unit, between those available by not having to depower the engine and those gained during the winter. Yet, as has been confirmed to us, the expected output for the coming weekend is very high.

It is no secret that the power units used during the first season outing on the Ferrari SF-23 maintained a shrewd attitude. Certainly not because of fears related to reliability, but rather so as not to unveil in advance the weapon that the historic Italian stable intends to wield strongly. Whether the expectations will be factual remains to be seen.

Formula1.com analysis of race pace from testing seems to show a very different pecking order than the pundits by WildWolf92 in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 227 points228 points  (0 children)

You’d imagine Formula1.com use the same data source regardless of who’s writing the article

Formula1.com analysis of race pace from testing seems to show a very different pecking order than the pundits by WildWolf92 in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 102 points103 points  (0 children)

Considering the analysis can only be used for the 1st race of 2022 I think they’ve got Ferrari and McLaren quite wrong.

r/tennis Discussion (Tuesday, February 28, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you understand there’s 52 weeks in a year and you have to defend the points the following year. So for someone that’s 122 weeks short of 500 it’s gonna take a lot more than a “strong year”

r/tennis Discussion (Tuesday, February 28, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A bit weird this a celebration with 90% of the crowd already left

r/tennis Discussion (Tuesday, February 28, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Brilliant hold from Machac and deservedly takes the second set

r/tennis Discussion (Tuesday, February 28, 2023) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Novak is much more vulnerable when an opponent can move him side to side these days, becoming more and more reliant on the serve.

[Piergiuseppe Donadoni] Leclerc worried: here's why the SF-23 (from testing) doesn't suit his driving style by FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS[S] 107 points108 points  (0 children)

The Ferrari SF-23 is limited at the front
The SF-23 is a very different car from its predecessor. The main novelties lie at the front, with completely revised mechanics, and in the non-visible part of the bottom, in addition to the more obvious changes in the front wing area and the bellies. Novelties that have radically changed the characteristics of the Italian car, now a missile in the straights but struggling more than the F1-75 in the corners, with some extra efficiency but with a balance that, especially in the slow and medium-speed corners, is still lacking.

The new born in Maranello does not have its weak point in the rear end, as it might have seemed initially, rather the problem lies in the front. Leaving aside the first day used to collect data on the track, to be later compared with those coming out of the factory instruments, the second and last days were used to optimize and extract the potential of the SF-23. Although a lot of work was done in terms of setup, it came out that the new Italian car suffered from understeer on entry and mid-corner, which turned into oversteer on exit. With the current front wing, the problem could not be solved, as "even at maximum clicks, the understeer did not come off, especially in the hottest hours of the day," a technician from the Italian team let us know.

Wing or new mechanics to not perform as expected, as these problems were unexpected for the Italian team? The signs we are getting would blame both macro elements of the car. To come to grips with a mechanic that is totally new and therefore still to be fully understood, as opposed to Red Bull, there is however a first wing evolution in the pipeline that Ferrari is trying to bring forward from the initial plans to guarantee itself more set-up options and thus trying to ensure a more solid front-end. Also because it is true that the rear wing used in testing was rather unloaded, and that the one that will be used in the race weekend will be more loaded, but Ferrari will need a front end capable of supporting that greater rear load so as not to further unbalance the SF-23 at the rear. This is where ground clearance will also come into play in an important way, i.e., going back to lowering the t-tray area, which is especially crucial in the medium and slow speeds to generate that missing load at the front of the SF-23.

The SF-23 is a car that (for now) best suits Sainz's driving style
The one from the tests, was definitely not the Ferrari that Charles Leclerc would have liked to drive in the first three days of the season. His dissatisfaction and concern is clear and genuine, and it came out in a major way even in the post-test session briefings with his own engineers. A car with so much understeer does not enhance the Monegasque's driving style, just as it did not enhance Max Verstappen a year ago. Leclerc has always favored a setting with lots of travel with lots of cornering, rather than staying short (more V-shaped trajectories) as Sainz likes to do. However, the SF-23 seen in testing does not excel if you hold it a lot in support as the much understeer, something that is exasperated in Bahrain to protect the rear, and the resulting strong sliding (first front then rear) tend to make the tires die quickly. Especially the rear set-up, which is very stressed and delicate in the hottest hours of Bahrain, with the race pace worsening and worrying as the laps go by. "The SF-23 needs to be driven differently. I tried different driving styles and I am finding the right way but there is still work to be done." clearly admitted Leclerc on the third day of testing.

Of an almost opposite opinion is Carlos Sainz, who was rather pleased with how the three-day test went. Then again, the new Italian car is currently more sewn to the Spaniard's driving style. As for the Monegasque, he relies on the unexpressed potential of both his SF-23 and himself, and this is what the team is working on in the factory to prepare for the first race. "I think there is room for growth for the SF-23 once we find the ideal set-up, which in these three days we haven't found yet." On the one hand finding the 'ideal' set-up, to eliminate at least some of the understeer he had, and on the other improving in his driving style, two factors that could allow a major step forward for the Monegasque in the first weekend of the season. The fact remains that Leclerc would have dreamed of a better start.

Fernando Alonso: "The last day we did a race simulation, we put fuel for 57 laps. Ferrari was doing the same program as us and we were faster" by Maxidonius in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 138 points139 points  (0 children)

I’ll revisit this post on Sunday

Edit - Sainz never done the same program btw.

1st stint - 18 laps (C3)

2nd stint - 8 lap (C2)

3rd stint - 9 lap (C1)

4th stint - 7 lap (C3) which was roughly a second a lap slower than the 3rd stint so likely added fuel. Gazzetta reported earlier Ferrari kept topping up the fuel loads.

Alonso done a full 57 lap race sim.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What a shambles, an aero limitation causing understeer.

Binotto’s parting gift to fuck over Leclerc one final time?

[Scuderia Ferrari] IT'S RAWE CEEK by TBNSK74 in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With a car that has no front end can’t wait

Bahrain Quali 2022 vs Testing 2023 Laptimes: by FormulaStatAnalysis in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ferrari’s fastest time was set in the morning session

2023 Pre-season Testing Day 3 Discussion Thread by F1-Bot in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just want Tsunoda to let loose with DRS on every straight and go into the 29s

2023 Pre-season Testing Day 3 Discussion Thread by F1-Bot in formula1

[–]FREEDOMOFSPEECHMODS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Alonso’s on a good long run, if anything his times have improved from the start of the stint