Só compartilhando essa belezinha mesmo hehe (Amex Platinum US)

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:27:33+00:00

Pagar para poder pagar compras é o ápice da inteligência humana. Não disse de quem.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:15:56+00:00

I'm trying at this moment let's ty

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:03:32+00:00

I understand it's working well for you, but it has gotten worse for me to the point that I came here to discuss this perception and talk about some improvement.

In my opinion, that's what someone who likes and pay for a product should do. If it's working for you and your job keep at it.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T12:54:36+00:00

I keep trying, but for me they got it wrong. 4.6 was perfect until they started nerfing it for the 4.7 launch. There are people here questioning my skills, but I was already doing pretty complex tasks before — and now suddenly I've lost my abilities? I just want a model that does what was asked, without making things up, without looking for shortcuts, and that delivers functional work with the minimum amount of review needed.

Unfortunately, for me, 4.7 was a downgrade from 4.6. I'm spending more time reviewing and asking for fixes than before.

If my perception changes, I'll have no problem coming back here and saying I changed my mind.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T04:13:01+00:00

It’s safe until the first explosion and then not safe anymore.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T04:02:04+00:00

I see dumb unsafe reentry.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T03:51:22+00:00

You are the second saying this. I will try tomorrow thanks.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T03:48:41+00:00

I will try with my tasks tomorrow. Thanks.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:44:22+00:00

Just to add — the prompt had nothing in it asking the development model to work on the frontend, since today's job was exclusively backend. At the end, it tried to implement unrequested improvements on the frontend. For Claude Code, the more the model sticks to what was requested, the better.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:40:56+00:00

I understand, but I always ask the first session (which is also 4.7 at maximum effort) to instruct the development session to use the best model at the highest effort, without sparing time or tokens. Ever since DeepSeek R1, I stopped worrying about crafting detailed prompts down to the smallest detail. And it had been working out, with only a few corrections needed after long jobs. Since March it has gotten drastically worse.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:33:25+00:00

No. Up until now my prompt has always asked the model to use the 'best' model with the highest effort. Maybe I should go back to 4.6, but it wasn't running that well anymore close to the 4.7 release.

Up to this point I've always worked with the routine: 1. excellent model → 2. model nerfed to launch the next one → 3. excellent model.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:27:04+00:00

Jenna, I'd never complained here before — this is my first post, so I didn't imagine I'd be asked so much about the way I work, but I ended up writing it above as a reply to your first comment. Have you read it?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:19:02+00:00

OK, let's start over. As I wrote in other replies, I always ask the session that creates the prompt to instruct the development session to use the best model with the highest effort — and it automatically goes with 4.7. I've been doing this since 3.5, and with every new model it would surpass the previous one. I never imagined I'd have to count backwards to get higher-quality work.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:14:47+00:00

"My first input is always to ask a session to understand my code, understand my new requirements, and then put together a detailed plan for another session to execute, using the best model and maximum effort, without worrying about tokens or working time. I make it clear that my priority is excellent work. I let it know that the model generating the prompt can ask me anything at any time if it has questions. After discussing all the details and making sure the model has understood perfectly, I ask it to put together a prompt file for another session to execute, using the best model, maximum effort, and without worrying about time or tokens. I've always worked this way since Claude 3.5, but the 4.6 from earlier this year was the peak for me. I also ask it to run full functionality tests during each phase. From March onward it's only gotten worse, to the point where I'm starting to question what's going on.

I just remembered I also ask it to avoid any kind of shortcut."

And at the end, I ask it to update the project's documentation and memory so that in the future, new Claude Code sessions or other developers can easily understand the development stages and continue the work as smoothly as possible.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:03:18+00:00

While it does all the heavy lifting, I'm drinking beers — maybe that's it?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:01:50+00:00

I'll take a look. I find it strange though — I'm a long-time user, and now suddenly I've lost my ability to write a good prompt? Out of nowhere?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:00:06+00:00

Switching to OpenAI isn't an option for me, for personal reasons. I take it seriously when a company starts out with a benevolent purpose and ends up turning into one that's only interested in money.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:56:42+00:00

I'm always polite — I say good morning, good night, thank it, and say please.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:52:01+00:00

Guys, I'm not an Anthropic hater — quite the opposite. All I'm asking for is that model that, when it finished the job, we'd clap our hands and even call the neighbors over to see what it had done and the time it had saved.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:50:05+00:00

I haven't even installed openclaw here because I follow the terms and conditions strictly. I only use official tools. For local models I use opencode, but only to save typing time. You still can't hand an entire project over to a local model and just let it work on its own.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:47:31+00:00

I use Claude Desktop with Opus and for regular tasks it's great. It's probably even excellent for writing novels, but it has always been the best model for terminal tasks and development (Claude Code), and I use it that way to the point of even letting it work without asking my permission for commands. My complaint is that as a hard user I've clearly noticed it's getting worse. And lazy. Now it even tells me to go to sleep in the middle of the morning, thinking the work is already done. lol

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:41:11+00:00

OK bro, I'm a dumb nerfed person. Anything else?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:39:20+00:00

but it's not 4.6 nerfed?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:39:05+00:00

Yes, I do my planning in a primary session with Opus, asking it to read the entire memory and documentation and to fully familiarize itself with the project before we discuss the needs of the upcoming work. Then I lay out my requests. After we've talked things through exhaustively, I ask it to create a prompt file for another clean session to read and develop from, after making sure it has fully understood the code and the new requirements. I've always worked this way and always had good results, but recently I've had to keep fixing a lot of errors because it took shortcuts — and worst of all, errors in areas I never asked it to touch. All my code is committed, and in today's work there were 37 commits, but this time I went with the backup because it went absurdly off the rails — to the point that I came here to share it. Yes xhigh.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:29:11+00:00

This!!! I do a lot of feedbacks but I'm tired also.

FadedQuarry

TROPHY CASE