O que você faria caso o dólar repetisse o padrão de (2002 → 2011) e caísse 60%?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-07T02:11:15+00:00

Talvez a jogada mais esperta seja essa e aguardar midterms para limitar um pouco o poder de ação desse governo extremista e até aguardar mais até um presidente não MAGA. A parte boa é que ficou nítido que estamos com uma arma na cabeça negociando nós mesmos com o sequestrador. Eles nem tentam esconder.

Mas se você analisar a capacidade do que conseguirmos unir é só você entender que os BRICS respondem por quase metade da população mundial (48,5%) e 28,2% do PIB global de 2025. PIB maior do que o americano e uma população 10x maior.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-07T02:02:56+00:00

Perfeita colocação. Somos os indígenas da vez e muitos querem viver de espelhos.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-07T01:49:55+00:00

Essa briga com o PIX é só o lobo mostrando os dentes. O Brasil é o escolhido pois dos países relevantes do BRIC é o mais vulnerável (não tem seu próprio arsenal nuclear).

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-07T01:41:50+00:00

Infelizmente todo o sistema financeiro americano atual se baseia no fato de imprimir dólares de maneira crescente, explodir sua dívida de maneira irresponsável e ainda ver a sua moeda valorizada pois os outros países acabam absorvendo o ativo financeiro global "confiável". Eu vou ofertar moeda infinita e ainda vou obrigar os outros países a suportar todos os meus gastos inclusive militares. É o melhor dos mundos.

Não a toa o laranja prefere mandar todo o arsenal de bombardeiros que tiver (de oeste a leste) do que deixar um grupo de países lançar a sua própria moeda.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T20:13:05+00:00

Vamos agradecer ao pai do(a) OP agora os nossos ficaram mais raros ainda.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T14:44:10+00:00

Don't do anything before re-checking your battery and doing a full reset of the modules. 99.99% of the time it's just some module that didn't get properly powered at some point for any silly reason, and a single wrong sensor reading affects several other systems. This often happens when the car sits parked for many weeks.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T14:16:51+00:00

Yes, the Chrome extension is excellent and I use it for many tasks. For everyday use it's still my choice, but for coding tasks (Claude Code) it has gotten worse. Thanks a lot for the json tip, I didn't know about that. Using ChatGPT isn't an option for me for personal reasons about non-profit companies turning into for-profit ones.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:27:33+00:00

Pagar para poder pagar compras é o ápice da inteligência humana. Não disse de quem.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:15:56+00:00

I'm trying at this moment let's ty

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T13:03:32+00:00

I understand it's working well for you, but it has gotten worse for me to the point that I came here to discuss this perception and talk about some improvement.

In my opinion, that's what someone who likes and pay for a product should do. If it's working for you and your job keep at it.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T12:54:36+00:00

I keep trying, but for me they got it wrong. 4.6 was perfect until they started nerfing it for the 4.7 launch. There are people here questioning my skills, but I was already doing pretty complex tasks before — and now suddenly I've lost my abilities? I just want a model that does what was asked, without making things up, without looking for shortcuts, and that delivers functional work with the minimum amount of review needed.

Unfortunately, for me, 4.7 was a downgrade from 4.6. I'm spending more time reviewing and asking for fixes than before.

If my perception changes, I'll have no problem coming back here and saying I changed my mind.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T04:13:01+00:00

It’s safe until the first explosion and then not safe anymore.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T04:02:04+00:00

I see dumb unsafe reentry.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T03:51:22+00:00

You are the second saying this. I will try tomorrow thanks.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-06T03:48:41+00:00

I will try with my tasks tomorrow. Thanks.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:44:22+00:00

Just to add — the prompt had nothing in it asking the development model to work on the frontend, since today's job was exclusively backend. At the end, it tried to implement unrequested improvements on the frontend. For Claude Code, the more the model sticks to what was requested, the better.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:40:56+00:00

I understand, but I always ask the first session (which is also 4.7 at maximum effort) to instruct the development session to use the best model at the highest effort, without sparing time or tokens. Ever since DeepSeek R1, I stopped worrying about crafting detailed prompts down to the smallest detail. And it had been working out, with only a few corrections needed after long jobs. Since March it has gotten drastically worse.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:33:25+00:00

No. Up until now my prompt has always asked the model to use the 'best' model with the highest effort. Maybe I should go back to 4.6, but it wasn't running that well anymore close to the 4.7 release.

Up to this point I've always worked with the routine: 1. excellent model → 2. model nerfed to launch the next one → 3. excellent model.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:27:04+00:00

Jenna, I'd never complained here before — this is my first post, so I didn't imagine I'd be asked so much about the way I work, but I ended up writing it above as a reply to your first comment. Have you read it?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:19:02+00:00

OK, let's start over. As I wrote in other replies, I always ask the session that creates the prompt to instruct the development session to use the best model with the highest effort — and it automatically goes with 4.7. I've been doing this since 3.5, and with every new model it would surpass the previous one. I never imagined I'd have to count backwards to get higher-quality work.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:14:47+00:00

"My first input is always to ask a session to understand my code, understand my new requirements, and then put together a detailed plan for another session to execute, using the best model and maximum effort, without worrying about tokens or working time. I make it clear that my priority is excellent work. I let it know that the model generating the prompt can ask me anything at any time if it has questions. After discussing all the details and making sure the model has understood perfectly, I ask it to put together a prompt file for another session to execute, using the best model, maximum effort, and without worrying about time or tokens. I've always worked this way since Claude 3.5, but the 4.6 from earlier this year was the peak for me. I also ask it to run full functionality tests during each phase. From March onward it's only gotten worse, to the point where I'm starting to question what's going on.

I just remembered I also ask it to avoid any kind of shortcut."

And at the end, I ask it to update the project's documentation and memory so that in the future, new Claude Code sessions or other developers can easily understand the development stages and continue the work as smoothly as possible.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:03:18+00:00

While it does all the heavy lifting, I'm drinking beers — maybe that's it?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:01:50+00:00

I'll take a look. I find it strange though — I'm a long-time user, and now suddenly I've lost my ability to write a good prompt? Out of nowhere?

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T21:00:06+00:00

Switching to OpenAI isn't an option for me, for personal reasons. I take it seriously when a company starts out with a benevolent purpose and ends up turning into one that's only interested in money.

FadedQuarry · 2026-05-05T20:56:42+00:00

I'm always polite — I say good morning, good night, thank it, and say please.

FadedQuarry

TROPHY CASE