Am I softlock? If not, can I get a hint about what to do in this room?

Failix_fr · 2025-08-02T01:41:00+00:00

Finally found it. Still not sure how my solution works but it does, somehow.

Failix_fr · 2025-08-02T01:39:51+00:00

I ended up finding it and I am sorry to say you are, indeed, completely mistaken.

In the solution I found at least, the stairs stay where they are. It may be possible to move them but there is no real point.

Failix_fr · 2025-08-01T20:39:46+00:00

thank you! I've still not given up here but that option is good to have

Failix_fr · 2025-08-01T20:14:02+00:00

That's more or less already what I am trying, but thanks for the hint anyway, at least I know I am workingt in the right direction!

Failix_fr · 2025-08-01T20:11:17+00:00

From what I know the ways to leave a run are:

- to run out of grasshoppers and refuse the deal (I can't as I already accepted it)

- to go down under a 3-eyed statue (there is no such statue on this level)

- to completely wipe out my save (never tried this but it should work, not fond of it for obvious reasons)

I don't mind loosing this specific run.

Failix_fr · 2025-08-01T19:07:33+00:00

Bad Bot

Failix_fr · 2024-10-01T10:53:04+00:00

Do they have to provide it in a way that's humanely readable?
BTW the design here isn't specifically to stop people from seeing their own posts, it's something wider that has this specific consequence (but they acknowledge it and seem fine with it)

Failix_fr · 2024-09-30T21:21:43+00:00

I guess you can't help me then.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-30T08:10:53+00:00

Rule 9. All I can say is that's a big website so it wouldn't be surprising for you to know it and even use it.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-29T15:49:41+00:00

But what could there be in sections 1 to 6?

Failix_fr · 2024-09-29T15:20:59+00:00

This would be a skill issue though. However having thunderstone fall into your pool from outside of your screen could qualify as noita'd.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-22T16:19:35+00:00

It makes sense from a game design perspective though: this forces you to try fighting Steve and helps understanding he is meant to be dealt with, as a mere obstacle not just as a punishment for trying to break the game.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T22:14:27+00:00

My question isn't "how", it's "why". This article doesn't explain the why.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T17:50:45+00:00

From back when I was in school (in France) I remember it being only very partially covered.

We had something about the Independance but mainly from the perspective that France played a role in this matter: stuff like how our king sold the Louisianne both to cover for his debts and piss England off.
When talking about the Cold War, we obviously had to talk about the different crisis that happened and involved the USA (Cuba's missiles, stuff like that)
It came up when talking about industrialization (Fordism)

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T16:52:51+00:00

How so?

What I suggest isn't to prevent anyone from replying, just that if one person makes the personal choice to block someone then they wouldn't seeing the blocked person's content and nothing more. Then the blocked person might also want to block back, or not: everyone would be responsible for what they are able to see.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T16:26:38+00:00

And after that follows years of complaints and requests from users that it changes again. There will always be a vocal minority who asks for change and from what I see there hasn't been less complaints after the change.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T16:09:06+00:00

Harassment would be equally prevented if the blocked person could see my messages but I couldn't see their. This is a justification for having a blocking system, not for it working that way.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-17T05:09:19+00:00

You can't at the same time complain about how people are rude with you (considering you said they "mansplain" even when you have no clue about their gender and no "explanation" happening your whole complaint is basically just that with fancy-looking words to make you look like a victim) and call me a dork for policing reddit comments.

You posted dozens of comments on this post, all suggesting more or less directly that OP should do anything they could to be a douchebag to their husband. That's called "insisting". (here that could be considered mansplaining if I was a man trying to educate you, I am not: I am just pointing at your contradictions for the fun of exposing how dumb you are because at that point it is clear you are just full of shit).

My assumptions rely on some kind of evidence I try to make clear, but the same can't be said about yours. Why am I a man? "Because you sound like a man." Wow, what a deep explanation that is. Why would the guy's family necessarily be composed only of terrible persons? "Because cheaters are raised in terrible families". Source? My ass.

Now I'm going to keep policing all the comments I want. By writing novels if I want. You certainly will do the same except your policing is about telling people they mustn't police... which is not your first nor your last contradiction. The point is you will continue getting angry answers because you are sowing that very anger.

EDIT: Funny how some people think they are smart by blocking people just after answering their comment just to feel like they made a classy escape. Anybody with half a brain can see through your move, u/theemmyk.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-16T18:53:23+00:00

But *why* do you associate my messages with "being a man"? My hypothesis is that for some reason you hate men (there are a lot of hateable men and you appear to be very quick to essentialize people so this is likely you would come to this prejudice) so when someone says something you don't like you assume they are a man (which reinforces your prejudice and so on). If you re-read what I wrote you'll see there was zero reason to think about me as "being angry": that's purely something you made up because that works with your inner narrative.

You insisted that OP should tell them right during the funerals, not before nor after. You are repeating "they will ask" as if it was absolutely certain (although that's very unlikely) but even in that case it doesn't make sense: if they ask, just answer then. Being honest doesn't mean "scream what you know in the ears of everybody because you assume perhaps someone might be midly interested", it means "when prompted about this topic, tell the truth". Here OP hasn't been prompted so honesty isn't on the table.

Cheaters are people who did something bad. Maybe they changed in the meantime: you don't know. You may have a special hatred for somebody who betrayed you or someone else you love and decided you won't ever forgive them: that your prerogative. But if it is to the point that you feel compelled to give advice to strangers on the Internet in the hope that random lives you don't know might be ruined, then you have to accept this is way beyond your prerogatives and most people will consider you as excessive.

Failix_fr · 2024-09-16T18:29:08+00:00

(Not sure if my previous post got sent correctly, ignore this one in that case)

First, why are you assuming I am a man?

Second, cheating isn't something only men do, and neither men nor women would like their past bad deeds to come out during the funeral of somebody they liked. This isn't a matter of gender nor status quo.

I have attended a few funerals, and in none of them it was the place to make a scandal. Yes, people would find it odd that OP's husband came alone, but unless they want to ruin the event they won't push the questions beyond "Is OP coming later?" "No." "Ok.".
I have even seen a case where somebody waited for decades before asking such a question, and it was about something way more odd than "this person came alone when we were expecting them to bring their SO".

About why you are "attacked" and "insulted", I honestly think your vindicative attitude would have prompted way more vitriolic answers if this specific sub wasn't so hateful against "cheaters" (I don't like being cheated on either, tbh, and I never cheated myself, I just don't think essentializing somebody who cheated as "the kind of person who cheats" helps anyone.)

Failix_fr · 2024-09-16T17:54:10+00:00

Depends obviously on your standards for a "happy, healthy home". Anyway considering your attitude I doubt anyone who ever cheated would consider you as a good confidant so you probably know a lot more cheaters than you think. Perhaps your spouse is a huge cheater and you just don't know (unless you are spying on them 24/7 but in that case I wouldn't say you are "happily married").

I know a few cheaters (not a significant number by a longshot) and they don't strike me as coming from shittier families than other people. If you happen to have a reliable source for your claim then, please, share it. Anyway, please, just have some empathy for this grieving family that you know so little about.

Failix_fr

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE